this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
1145 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 110 points 7 months ago (13 children)

Hot take: teachers shouldn't lose their jobs for also having an onlyfans account.

[–] [email protected] 124 points 7 months ago (5 children)

our society should be ashamed that any teacher has to work a second job of any kind to survive .

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (4 children)

They shouldn’t. But the school saw no problem with her racial facade and hired her anyway. It sucks that this had to be reason she’s fired, but she otherwise would’ve continued getting rewarded for this fraud. I’m not losing sleep

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wait, this is fucking real?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

Incredible country

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I think you'd be hard pressed to find parents who don't have an issue with their kids teacher also being a pornographer

[–] [email protected] 63 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would have a lot greater issues with my kids' teachers being reactionaries.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (4 children)

well I think the majority of parents closely guard their children when it comes to this issue (in a general sense), because children are very easily exploited, and this matter is one that's very easy for people to exploit others with, so they want to be fully in control or at least oversight of the teaching of this subject - the same goes for politics. Not always with great results of course, and sometimes unintentionally (or in the worst cases intentionally) harmfully, but mostly because of that protective impulse.

Generally, when parents talk about what they want their children to be, they say happy and prosperous, and something useful like a scientist or a bus driver or similar, or to follow in their own career sometimes. I've never heard a parent say they want their children to become pornographers. And again, the vast majority of parents don't want an authority figure and role model for their child to be one. I don't think this is because they don't want their children to grow up to not enjoy or engage in normal human interactions, but rather that its something that can (and often does) carry a great deal of risk and harm, and they want to wait for an appropriate time, when they're wiser, for them to experience or learn about it.

So I'm not sure your implied accusation (I hope I haven't misread you) that its reactionary to not want a pornographer teacher is true.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Theres lots of people I don't want my children around, and pornstars are nowhere near the top of that list. Fascists and reactionaries are. If you open up firing people for what they do in their free time, then I think we should focus on those that are actually harmful first.

Children are very easily exploited.

Do you think having an OnlyFans gives you a craving to make CP?? Do you think OnlyFans hosts CP?
One of the biggest groups of sexual offenders are cops, and they're placed IN SCHOOLS for some reason.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

"Don't sit on that public toilet seat!!! You might catch prostitution!" live-slug-reaction

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If they're not doing it in front of the kids or the parents then it's not the kids or the parents' business.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (26 children)

sure, but once its found out, it is their business since it becomes public knowledge. No doubt many teachers get up to the usual range of activities of various kinds that are seen as illicit or taboo in secret, but they're public role models for children in their profession, so.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (25 children)

Those other commenters have accepted a premise baked into your comment that I do not. Why can't a public role model also be a model on OnlyFans? The only reason you would think that those two things are incompatible is if you think that there is something morally wrong with one of them, which I don't believe holds water. There is no form of sex work that I believe disqualifies someone from being a role model, and therefore a teacher, a parent, a counselor, or anything else.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (41 children)

but once its found out, it is their business since it becomes public knowledge.

Here's the neat part: No it isn't. It's not something the teacher does at school or during school hours, so it's not public business.
What if the teacher wrote 90's gangster rap songs? What if the teacher was a gun nut? What if the teacher wrote the next big group of gritty fantasy novels like ASoIaF? Lots of SA in those books... Should the teacher be fired then? What if the teacher lands a gig on Law & Order SVU as some sort of sexual offender? What if the teacher likes to jog in bootyshorts? That's kinda scandalous. What if the teacher drinks pepsi, but this is a coke town?
All of those reasons are precisely as valid as your "concern" for a teacher with OnlyFans

load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah because Americans are stupid right wing reactionaries that think sex is something Satan gave humanity and get scared when their wee wees harden as a result.

Same logic as drag queens being "groomers" to kids when they read them stories, or trans people being a threat in schools. Just a massive moral panic caused by judeo Christian soylent. A fucking non issue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago

I would have a lot greater issue with my kids going to the same school as a bunch of busybodies. As long as the teacher teaches while they're at school, then it's not my business what they do outside of school.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Rachel Dolezal, who now goes by Nkechi Diallo,

People point out that you're pretending to be black and you change your name to Nkechi?! Come on, bro.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Prime example of doubling down and never admitting fault. If she had ever apologized or faltered she would have had to go into hiding from the shame. But by leaning into it, she becomes impervious to criticism. Honestly impressive--it's on the level of our big wet boy

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

a few years ago I was listening to an interview with a psychologist or something that made a pretty strong argument that she's actually extremely delusional, just not holding onto reality

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 7 months ago

Gulag for the transracialism, not the onlyfans.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 7 months ago

Racial Dolezal deep-infiltration

[–] [email protected] 51 points 7 months ago

Honestly, why even teach? She's so public that she probably makes bank on that

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago

cant have shit under capitalism

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I remember some Elementary School teachers getting fired for being involved in the local meth trade, this country is really turning to shit... smedly-exhausted

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I love a woman who is a total mess

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

Wait this isn't /c/fakenews

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit it actually is Rachel Dolezel

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I legit thought to myself not more than a week ago "wonder what that one "black" woman is up to now days". Well...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

I've never seen more ridiculous pearl clutching walls of text on this website ever before

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)

frothingfash they're just trying to keep an entrepreneurial woman of color down!!!11!1!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›