top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 159 points 2 years ago (15 children)

I hope this encourages children to learn an important life skill that will help them in numerous ways: Piracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [+] 97 points 2 years ago (14 children)
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    As a quote in the article states, porn is the canary in the coal mine - with some MPs apparently advocating for blocking VPNs to prevent work arounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 81 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I mean, the government could tackle homelessness, or end child hunger, many appropriate subjects. But instead they want to regulate jerk-off material. Sad.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    its always nice that they want your official id associated with your porn. i just want to see what happens when that database gets hacked.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 43 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    This might be a big nitpick, but "Child Protection Groups", vs "Privacy Warriors", sounds sleazy.

    As positive connotations as possible on one side, vaguely negative on the other.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Didn't you know? The right to privacy somehow only protects adults and not children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago*

    In case anybody needs a reminder, the UK Government's response to the Snowden Revelations that showed even more widespread surveillance of civil society in the UK than in the US was, unlike in the latter country, to pass laws that retroactivelly made the whole thing legal.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Pretty positive this is going to end up being a DNS level block that will be as simple as setting a dns server outside of the UK to bypass.

    Because anything else would create an unbelievable amount of administrative overhead.

    Also imagine the spike in identity theft this is going to cause.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I'm an advocate of VPN but this is not the situation to recommend them but to chastise regulators and lawmakers for even allowing this. This is eroding our freedom of speech. I can see politicians expanding this and censoring terrorist speech and speech of certain political ideologies. It is the erosion our civil liberties we need to worry about.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Porn perusers will soon have to prove their age by uploading an identity document like a passport, registering a credit card, [...]

    Ah, mandatory account creation with linked credit card being the most widely available and likely easiest option?

    No wonder the porn sites aren't fighting this too hard!

    (...or are they?)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    My guess is that some companies will greatly benefit from this regulation because they can somewhat monopolize the market. I also wouldn't be surprised if those were the ones who lobbied for this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    Oi yer got ye wankn loicense

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Discounting VPNs for a moment..

    What if one person made an account with ID and then the entirety of the country just happened to know the login?

    Usr: admin Pass: admin

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Ofcom wants porn consumers to "think of the children".

  • source
  • Not this shit again

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    So the latest the UK can call an election and get Labor in charge is January 2025, the same month this goes into effect. Wonder if they will rush a repeal or get blamed for it starting?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Easy. Everything bad that happens before January 2025 is Gordon Brown's fault, and everything after it's Kier Starmer's. You know it's true because it says so in the Daily Mail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [B] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Porn perusers will soon have to prove their age by uploading an identity document like a passport, registering a credit card, presenting their face to AI-powered scanning technology, or using a handful of other methods outlined in draft guidance from the regime’s regulator, Ofcom.

    Although initially missing from the U.K.’s next attempt at internet regulation, pressure from children’s charities, age verification providers and vocal parliamentarians persuaded the government to revamp the defunct regime through the Online Safety Act.

    Many videos depict graphic and degrading abuse of women, sickening acts of rape and incest, and many underage participants,” Tory MP Miriam Cates, a strong advocate for the legislation, told the House of Commons in September.

    Research indicates younger kids who stumble across porn accidentally can find it shocking and disturbing — although the majority of young people surveyed in a 2020 British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) report said this didn’t impact them in the long term.

    But the issue is complicated: the BBFC report found that older teens said they watched porn for educational purposes, due to a lack of information about sex in schools, or for gratification, while half of the LGBTQ+ respondents said it had helped them understand and explore their sexual identity.

    “The squeamishness associated with pornography has made it nearly impossible to have a mature discussion about the technical feasibility, trade-offs, and effectiveness of age verification mandates,” says Matthew Lesh, director of public policy and communications at the free-market think tank.


    The original article contains 2,313 words, the summary contains 245 words. Saved 89%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Although initially missing from the U.K.’s next attempt at internet regulation, pressure from children’s charities, age verification providers and vocal parliamentarians persuaded the government to revamp the defunct regime through the Online Safety Act.

    Ah, good ol' "think of the children," once again doing the heavy lifting for the morality police and state surveillance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›