you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I'm an advocate of VPN but this is not the situation to recommend them but to chastise regulators and lawmakers for even allowing this. This is eroding our freedom of speech. I can see politicians expanding this and censoring terrorist speech and speech of certain political ideologies. It is the erosion our civil liberties we need to worry about.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I agree that it's a slippery slope, but what does this have to do with freedom of speech?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Smut is speech. Frankly, smut is the highest form of speech. You should not need to show your papers to speak or to listen

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Is that a legal definition or your personal interpretation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    If it's a legal definition then that's the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If you want to start talking to lawmakers about wanting to watch porn without having to show ID, you would be dismissed if you're going to cite free speech being the right it is infringing upon. Privacy would be a better starting point, for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Big shame people are unaware of a century’s worth of obscenity law… how in western democracy the high courts literally found that laws like these violated free speech protections over “local prurient interests” and hence struck down those laws.

  • source
  • parent