this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8185 readers
30 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Almost feels like my brain is broken or some shit.

I’m looking at the pricing of houses in my area and comparing it to my salary, and how the actual fuck is anyone affording a house these days? We’re talking almost half a million for a house that takes <2 days to build and is practically an irl copy and paste of some of the homes down the street. What the actual fuck. It seems like I’m the only one (though I know I’m not) who sees how this is completely at odds with everything I learned about the world.

Also, so salaries. How the fuck are they determined? Because it certainly isn’t the result of how much actual work you do, I’m making nearly six figures and I do jack shit yet I’m supposed to just be OK with how morally repugnant that is, as if I’m not also a piece upholding the same utterly corrupt system as well?

Fuck if I know, I try to say this shit to people irl and they just tell me that the world’s not fair blah blah blah. Yeah homie, “not fair” is quite possibly the biggest understatement ever.

I very much understand what people say when they say that money is not real. Feel free to grill my complete ignorance of Econ too if you wish, maybe it’s just something I’ll never understand

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'll do the usual plug for the book "Bullshit jobs" since no one else has. It talks a lot about the reasons why nothing makes sense.

I feel like I'm losing my mind at work. I feel burnt out despite not really accomplishing anything material. I was just talking with someone who does real work and they talked about how nice it can feel to come home physically exhausted and not have to worry about the shit that will be there next shift. Grass is always greener, but "the more useful your job is the less you're paid" is a very reliable rule when applied inside an industry, and pretty good in general.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Read it a few months ago, and now I’m almost convinced that I shouldn’t have 🙃

The part about “moral envy” has really been fucking with me lately

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

now I’m almost convinced that I shouldn’t have 🙃

same brother same.

If i were more more capable of dishonesty and being a grifter I'm sure I could use that knowledge to squeeze some more, but I just want to put in some labor and get paid fairly (where homes aren't millions of dollars). More importantly I want that for everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Fuck that, squeeze. You’re not taking from fellow workers you’re taking from the shareholders. You should be complaining about your pay as often as possible. That shit compounds

Edit: and if you’re young get a new job every 2 years like clockwork

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know, I go in to meetings with the biggest impostor syndrome and come out realizing I was the only one who knew what I was talking about. Swear to god feels like we're playing with dolls sometimes, only instead of having fun I'm trying not to lose it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

It’s its own special kind of hell. Especially when you’re relatively young and you’re just like welp, only 40 years to go.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 9 months ago (3 children)

unfortunately we have created a society where everyone works. You need two people making a 100k to own property. I agree I do jack shit and I feel like I can't save much. And since we both work the weekends just turn into catching up on cleaning. Free time has plummeted. I'm happy to have a house but man I'm burnt out.

If we are all gonna work i need a 4 day or 3 day work week man.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago

!!!! I try to tell this to people too and they tell me I’m anxious/getting ahead of myself.

truly incomprehensible to me. My dad was the only one working while I was growing up and he as somehow able to provide for myself as well as my other siblings.

It’s almost gotten to a point where I cannot talk about these things because it quickly becomes a conversation about my “inability to adapt” or whatever other bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How in the hell do I get one of those corporate jobs making almost triple my salary for way less effort? Because I'm looking at the same houses and they're even further away from affordable on my shit wages

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Look up if there are Community Land Trusts in your area, it's legit the only reason I was able to get my family into a house in Seattle and out of the nightmare rent extortion. Houses are sold at cost, you just agree to sell for the same to the next homeowner, plus some built in equity % for each year lived in the the house to cover upkeep.

Probably won't help OP as he is making too much to qualify for the program. One of the reasons we should be expanding these kind of programs is the increase accessibility so the qualifications can be expanded to more people.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fucking preach!! We are we fucking sold this idea that if you major in STEM, you’ll just gradually climb your way to the top (as if there aren’t C suites still in the company who should’ve retired decades ago but still want more wealth/power).

I bet fucking Econ 101 didn’t account for that variable. Maybe that means we should make the slightest effort to try to implement some kind of constraint 🤔

Like, holy shit dude. Congrats, your yearly salary is probably as much as I‘ll make in 10. I think you can hire a financial advisor at this point and retire comfortably.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm a stem professional. One year senior management told us we had done a good job bringing a new technology to market and that the company was making good earnings per share but that we would nevertheless not get a bonus. Later on, a board member was blessing us with his presence and told us about his art car collection. Fucking art cars, worth a few hundred grand a pop and he had a dozen. I rode a fucking bike to work and rented a 700 sqft apartment. That dumb fucking asshole, I hope his dick rots off.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago (3 children)

my shitty ancient doublewide on like 0.3 acre surrounded by industrial zoning is worth over 150k and i paid about what a used truck goes for now 5 years ago

i have done no renovation work and only let it degrade further.

makes no sense

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

we should all invest in your doublewide until that stonk goes to the moon

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How fucked is it that my first thought was “oh wow half a million, he must live somewhere with cheap house prices.” Of course it’s not cheap in the abstract, just a sign of how monumentally insane home prices have got in high demand urban and suburban areas. My FIL is selling her house and the ask price is $1.5 million. We’re talking about a modest, 2 bedroom (with an attic that could be used as an extra bedroom but due to the layout can’t be listed as such) house, not some glorious mansion.

And with interest rates now back up due to the Fed trying to tame inflation by beating down the working class again, the sort of people who used to be able to just barely afford those mortgages can’t now. And like you said, we’re not talking minimum wage earners or entry level white collar workers, we’re talking households making 2-3 times the nation median household income can’t afford to buy a house.

I think this is part of the reason millennials and zoomers are having fewer kids, besides the cost and starting families latter in life due to those costs. We know how fucked everything is and that it’s likely going to get more fucked, so if we want our kids to have the best chance possible we have to maximize resources per kid which means fewer of them. Effectively, we have to put all our eggs in one basket because we have so few of them.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, this is one of the only places I can go to sorta check my sanity. I get that we live in an endless age of information and every “bad thing” is at your fingertips blah blah, but what about when the bad things show up at your front door.

It’s as if people act like “the information age” isn’t literally an illustration of things happening to people living in the world.

It’s like a bad movie where the whole town isn’t concerned about the killer until people in the city start dying. And even that isn’t an apt comparison because the killer is here and no one gives a fuck (idk might be a huge stretch but that’s where my brain went for some reason)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not to cut myself on this edge, but it feels like Donnie Darko where

spoilerIt turns out the preacher is a criminal predator but everyone keeps supporting him and refusing to believe the stark evidence

It’s right up in our faces how fucked up the system is right now, but so many people willfully deny it because they’re uncomfortable with the implications in acknowledging it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Damn you just gave me a whole new perspective

The fucked up system is right in our face to a degree never before seen in history (arguable but hopefully you catch my drift). I don’t know if this is too hyperbolic but I feel imprisoned in a way. And if I feel imprisoned having to be babysat by my laptop, I can’t even comprehend how others feel

And all I can do now is shout into an online void about how everything sucks and continues to get worse

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

And meanwhile the reactionaries will blame the lack of kids on soybeans and Jewish space lasers

[–] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago

Re: Salaries

Salaries are quite literally a social construct- there is no objective "correct salary" for any job, it's a constant game where the companies pay as little as possible to keep you around and you have to fight for any raise (which they will then pretend is all you deserve).

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago

Econ is just capitalism’s state religion

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Salaries are determined by as little as porky thinks he can get away with and sometimes a statutory minimum.

Housing prices are determined by financial speculation.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But porky pays him nearly 6 figures not because it's as little as he can get away with

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is as little as he can get away with at the moment and he's hard at work to decrease that number by making it cheaper to buy the relevant labor commodity - the laborer with a particular skillset that porky needs for production. Hence the heavy-handed push for bootcamps and STEM education, for example, to decrease the price of labor for programming and data stuff. In reality, this is an attempt to increase the size of the relevant labor pool so he can pay them as little as he pays everyone else. This is also what capitalist media call a "labor shortage". In reality, it's that porky doesn't want to pay enough for labor so he wants to instead will try to increase the supply and have some propaganda to cover it. Offshore. Bring in new exploitable labor, ideally as some kind of vulnerable economic underclass. Crush unions. You know the drill. It's 200 years old.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This thinking underestimates the ideological role of treats. You need enough of the population of the imperial core to not question things too closely which you do by buying them off a little bit. OP is being paid 85k with the hopes they will be a right-wing Democrat and not a class-concious socialist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You could always use your ample downtime to commit time "theft" if you work at home and aren't subjected to dystopian af surveillance by your employer.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That’s what I’m doing right now 😌

But it is extremely dumb because I sorta have to be by on my computer on standby, otherwise I’d be out doing shit that actually helps people

Remote work is both a blessing and a curse

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago

Remote work is both a blessing and a curse

yah its a fuck. I try and get out do stuff anyhow. connectivity with laptops and smartphones is such that you kinda can just go as long as you can interrupt it with work at any time, and you get any relevant work notifications on your phone.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I rent a 2 bed attic. You can't fit 2 people in the kitchen. You have to crouch in the shower. It's cold as shit.

To buy it would cost 400k.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Just off the top of my head:

-"House Flipping" culture

-Short-term rentals and AirBnb

-"Professional Landlordism"

-Corporate residential landholding

-Rabid boomer landowners who lose their minds when any rise in property tax gets mentioned, which results in artificially inflated property valuations

-No rent control

Obviously the REAL answer is Capitalism, but the above phenomena create ripple effects across the whole housing market, which is something that the r*dditors always overlook when they quote stats that say "corporate ownership of residential properties only represent a small fraction of the market." Yeah, maybe they do, but even that small fraction ripples out to housing precarity for millions of people.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Every time they do that, I always ask myself "Are these anglos aware that they're acting out their own stereotypes about Jews?" if I didn't know any better, I would think that they were all doing an antisemitic minstrel show, but nope, this is their actual values at work that they will always blame on Jews whenever.

Every accusation a confession.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is the point that Marx was making in his Jewish question essay, that all of the stereotypes of Jews were just the bourgeois projecting their own fucked up behaviors under capitalism onto a scapegoat. Of course he approaches it by accepting the initial premises of antisemitism as a rhetorical way to prove how ridiculous it is, so some of the statements seem a little iffy out of context

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

To be honest, I think a lot of the above are very minor reasons compared to just the effective cartel between landlords and property developers - If poor people had any meaningful mechanisms to own or build their own houses at or near cost, the rest wouldn't matter at all. But I guess I also admit that I'm edging very close to just 'the answer is capitalism'.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

Economics isn’t really a fucking science it’s more of a social contract on how we all work together and decide to distribute wealth creation we could all be paying each other in blowjobs if we wanted to

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-Om2rzpC9I

Pretty interesting video where an economics professor kinda guilty confesses that he took part in a political project that was designed to rip off the average American and neuter anything that was left of the civil state.

That was my weird fucking rant

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

We’re talking almost half a million for a house

My first thought was "only half a mil?"

kitty-cri-screm My brain is mostly worm

Also yeah the less valuable work you do the more money you make.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

500K for a manufactured home. Takes less than two days to build

It’s all a cheap joke man I want off this ride

Also, just the natural result of completely normalizing the phrase “life’s not fair”

People pretty much gave the bourgeois clearance to wreck havoc beyond comprehension on the planet because “life’s not fair” I guess 🤪

As if it were a tenant in some dogma of capitalism

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

so salaries. How the fuck are they determined

Not sure how yours is determined because I don't know what you do, but in software there are contractors that charge exorbitant prices to do like the most basic programming task. So if a company pays a developer a salary, they don't have to do very much to make it extremely worth the while of the business. Like if someone makes 80-100k per year and develops like an api layer using cloud services, maybe a few months work, it's already more than paid for itself. Anything else they work on that year, or doing tech support work, is basically free. I have a friend who writes yaml configs for azure services and makes incredible amounts of money, but works very little. But like you say, you have to always be by the computer. So even though the pay is high the work is still exploitative.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m a salaried SQL developer but here’s where the guilt comes in. I don’t “develop” anything. I parse a script that someone else wrote decades ago and tweak it to work for certain scenarios.

lmao a lot of people are referencing bullshit jobs in this thread, and this answer is like the epitome of a bullshit job. Sounds like I might be a duct taper if I’m remembering right?

It gets difficult though because I’ve talked to some programmers who fucking grind so maybe I’m just an extreme outlier.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

SQL developer who does fucking nothing solidarity, comrade! agony-deep if my company knew how many on the clock naps i have i'd be fucked, but theres legit nothing to do lol

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

It’s all utterly absurd

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

How the fuck are [salaries] determined?

If you actually want to know, corporations are in a bit of a bind because (in the US) they need to be compliant with discrimination law (pay people somewhat equally for the same work) and pay competitively with other companies, but it is illegal to cooperate with other companies to share salary data (because they could act like a cartel to depress wages if enough companies were in cahoots).

So they need to set salary ranges that they actually follow and make sure similar employees are paid similarly and that any protected class isn't paid too little compared to others, and also pay similarly to other companies- but without getting data from those companies.

So, corporations submit salary data to consultants who anonymize and aggregate the data and send it back out to all the companies who submit data. There are like 4 main data vendors in the industry, and pretty much all Fortune 500 (and many more) use them.

Now, here's the interesting part. Most companies have a strategy whereby they aim to pay at about the 50th percentile for most jobs in most places (with some exceptions, paying more or less for some jobs depending on what the company decides is important - maybe they pay above market average for engineers or sales or whatever if that's important to them making money). So, if most companies are paying at this average rate for most jobs in a given industry, the average for each job gets narrower each year until it converges, and most jobs get paid about the same range at one company as at any other (within the same industry). So it's "basically" a price-fixing/cartel scheme but with extra steps. It does reduce variability, which could be good, but it may also depress wages somewhat, which would be bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

well there's always a silver lining. Remote work, making more than the median household income after only 4 years - can't be sniffed at.

in my country, they call such people the 'squeezed middle'. And to be frank, and no offence intended to your good self, they need squeezing like a lemon, since its the only way their interests (material, not proclaimed interests) are going to start aligning with the majority, the masses.

in any case, I expect you'll probably have to move somewhere cheaper or 'undesirable' - which will likely 'gentrify' the area, forcing those already there out, in the usual cycle.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh you’re 100% right. I can see the writing on the wall though, my company is gearing up for some big initiatives (“next generation” and “AI”) are the hot buzzwords right now, so it’s only a matter of time until I’m replaced by generative AI

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You can say that, but they are literally generations of "AI" away from being able to make and tweak code properly. It's mostly an excuse to squeeze and harry programmers as labor, and try to freeze their salaries like everyone else's has been for the last 30 years.

At most, LLM will be like robots in a factory, great in some circumstances, but can only really take the burden of 10-20% of the market share, while you still.need someone who knows what they are doing to check and correct the mistakes the robot makes for the other 80-90%. It's either that or be satisfied with a sub-standard level of product, and while some companies may be ok with that, tech companies know that places in China and India wll eat their lunch on the international market if they don't keep up. Basically what they are going to try to make LLM's do is do more with less, and then use the excuse that you are now 'less skilled' than your predecessor (even though you still have to have the same or better skills to recognize and correct the mistakes of the LLM) to freeze your wages (which lowers them with inflation).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

MFW Porky's so picky I am now considering fucking grad school JUST so maybe, just maybe, I can finally have some pork give me the permission to work for them for 40k a year. My childhood hyped me up to think I would do something special only to find out that I'm just useless surplus population.

In a more just system, porky would be threatened with jail time and be forced to give people jobs. You know, hold up his end of the bargain of being a job creator rather than a gatekeeper.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

In an even more just system, there's never a porky to begin with

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

I’m making nearly six figures and I do jack shit yet I’m supposed to just be OK with how morally repugnant that is

graeber

load more comments
view more: next ›