How many months (years?) did the dems sit on this shit and delay making it public?

Bill Clinton moved in the same circles back then, he did the same shit, so the dems were there while Trump did this.

Some of this happened as far back as the 1980s, a lot of it is from the mid 1990s, a lot of the allegations on file are from Epsteins first trial, from the Maxwell trial or shortly before or after these, but a lot of it was not made public before. This has been going on forever and has been successfully covered up over and over again, with the redacting of the Epstein Files being the most recent cover-up. Apparently some Dems have gotten access to some unredacted files some time after that, so technically this was info they accquired during Trump's second term, at least in this form.

Releasing this an on october surprise is incredibly cynical

Justice

Tilting an election

Yeah, Biden sat on this for 4 years and did nothing. We knew about epstein back in the obama time too, when he "went to prison" (at night only, got day release to keep going to work)

Toward the end of his first term QAnon had already pivoted to "Well yes Trump is a pedophile but he was a GOOD pedophile who was undercover to catch all the other ones!"

The document contains witness accounts from 11 women: 5 accused Donald Trump of sexual assault and 3 say that Epstein tried to traffic them to Trump. The MSNOW article says that at least 1 of the accusations is entirely new.

"Buh buh buh buh MY CHECKS AND BALANCES!?!?!" says the democrat.

For real though any functional state would have thrown the lot away by now which means that this rot is likely 70% or more of our representatives at this point.

standing-room only pit and we flood it to waist height every couple hours to flush the toilet

The site rule says "Post images that depict triggering content should be marked NSFW." The 50 page document does not have any images that are NSFW. There is no other mention of "NSFW" in the site rules or the comm rules. I intend to comply with the site rules and if there are stricter guidelines on what is NSFW, then the rules should be changed to say that. There should not be secret rules. Rules should be enforced as written.

I added a content warning at the start of the post as instructed by the rules. I also spelled out "sexual assault" because some users were complaining they don't know what "SA" means. If you see the content warning and don't want to read a news story related to sexual assault, then don't click on the post.

This is a government document. This document was published by the US government for everyone to read. They're discussing this story on daytime television.

NSFW tag reduces the visibility of the story on hexbear and also on other instances. People need to know about a government document which alleges that the President of the United States was doing sexual assault.

It already has a CW