you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 30 points 1 day ago (1 child)

The site rule says "Post images that depict triggering content should be marked NSFW." The 50 page document does not have any images that are NSFW. There is no other mention of "NSFW" in the site rules or the comm rules. I intend to comply with the site rules and if there are stricter guidelines on what is NSFW, then the rules should be changed to say that. There should not be secret rules. Rules should be enforced as written.

I added a content warning at the start of the post as instructed by the rules. I also spelled out "sexual assault" because some users were complaining they don't know what "SA" means. If you see the content warning and don't want to read a news story related to sexual assault, then don't click on the post.

This is a government document. This document was published by the US government for everyone to read. They're discussing this story on daytime television.

NSFW tag reduces the visibility of the story on hexbear and also on other instances. People need to know about a government document which alleges that the President of the United States was doing sexual assault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    This is based on a fuzzy recollection, so take it with a grain of salt, but I recall reading a recent post that requested SA/CSA-related posts be marked NSFW so that users who don't want to engage with it can use the NSFW preference to filter it out completely.

  • source
  • parent