top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 217 points 4 weeks ago (21 children)

Also also corporations fought the science for about a decade until safer alternatives were developed.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 168 points 4 weeks ago (15 children)

    Proof that corporations will fuck over the entire planet and its entire population and all the animals and plant life just to make mOnEy during their lifetime. Selfish as FUCK.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 4 weeks ago (10 children)

    It isn't even about the money, it's about the power and the game. They're addicted to the pursuit of power and corporate structures feed that addiction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    We need to start calling this corborate leaders, or finding a way to indicate it's the people in charge of the corporations. We've been using the aggregate term "corporations" because of conditioning. I know generally we all mean "board of directors" or "shareholders". But making it common to use some term to indicate "the people in charge"--or just name them in particular--maybe gives us a real target instead of an amorphous boogeyman of "corporations"? I don't know specifically how to achieve this though...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago

    Is it a few bad individuals, or the entire concept of a corporation?

    If I dumped barrels of pollution into the river myself as an individual, then I'd be arrested. But if I hide behind a corporate veil and pay someone else to do it, then nobody gets arrested, and my fine is below the environmental cost.

    Corporations are inherently evil. If they weren't, then they'd just pay for liability insurance like a doctor does. The whole reason they exist is to legally avoid the personal responsibility you suggest. Peacefully protesting outside their houses isn't enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 124 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

    Also the hole is still there, but it's slowly healing now instead of getting worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 56 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Yeah.

    This is like when people bitch and complain about a pothole and suddenly when the pothole is fixed? Silence.

    /S

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 51 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (8 children)

    Matt Walsh is an unserious goon at best, an actual moron at worst.

    But the reason that this sort of anti-science propaganda might actually work on well- intended people is because we don't advertise our major successes anymore. Or rather, we never really did advertise them enough, but as those successes became less visible compared to, say, a polio vaccine, just as it took scientists to inform us of the problem, they need to inform us of wins too.

    When I was a kid in the 90s, we had a lot of alarm bells going off about the Ozone Layer, about acid rains, and climate change (termed "global warming" then). None of these were particularly visible problems to most people. Each of these became massively politicized, but the fix for the first 2 was a relatively narrow remedy: find and implement replacements for hydroflourocarbons through environmental regulations, and cut mainly two compounds, sulfer dioxide and nitrogen oxides, from fossil fuel power plant emissions through cap and trade regulation policies and smokestack scrubbers. And it worked quite well, to the point that the ozone layer is repairing, as are ecosystems previously ravaged by acid rains.

    But scientists and the media never advertised that success nearly enough. Honestly we should have been politicizing that success, even, as much as we did the problems. Now it just seems to most like the problem quietly got forgotten like it never really mattered, rather than that it was a massive problem and we fucking fixed it through science, regulation and international cooperation. And that apparent disappearance of the problem without any noticeable change for the average Joe, and the resulting skepticism that it was ever a problem at all, has infected the one ongoing problem, the biggest and most complex of the problems, climate change.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 39 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

    This phenomenon is a flaw in broad (group) human reasoning, and it needs a name so that we can stop the generational backslide that comes from new people coming along and undoing all progress.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 22 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Hollywood has really geared us for the trope of “You can’t stop Phase 1”. Act 1, the hero tells the world about an impending supervillain. No one believes him. Act 2, the supervillain arrives and takes over the world, their rampage unstopped and made totally evident to all. Act 3, the hero comes up with an alternate plan that can be engineered in a day to defeat the villain after their arrival.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 30 points 4 weeks ago

    Yeah?

    But what about Y2K? All those programmers and companies stressed over it and nothing happened! /s

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 4 weeks ago* (14 children)

    I had to learn about this stuff to get my refrigerant certification. If you want to claim that CFCs aren’t that big of a deal then you are a fucking dumbass.

    1 atom of chlorine can destroy 100,000 atoms of ozone. For every 1 part of chlorine that enters the atmosphere 100,000 times that amount of ozone is destroyed. Not only that, it also absorbs and traps infrared and other types of radiation heat and stops it from escaping the atmosphere. That is just one of the elements in CFCs and they all do severe levels of damage, they aren’t very stable so they break down easy and ever atom of its compound gets to interact to it’s full effect. Shit’s really bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 weeks ago (13 children)

    i think i'm qualified as a chemist

    as far as ozone goes, CFCs are bad, HCFCs are less bad but still bad, bromine is even worse, iodine would be worse than bromine but also it's expensive and the only compound that would be slightly useful would be CF3I which decomposes very quickly. so we can actually maybe see it used in the future, because it's basically fine

    as far as GHG potential goes, the thing that is important are C-F bonds, these bonds do the IR absorption, and how fast that thing decomposes. if you introduce weak bonds decomposition is faster, a lot. C-F bonds are very strong, C-Cl a bit less but we don't want to do that. C-H are okayish, any double bond is also weak. so this is why CFCs and PFCs are very bad, because they last very long. HFCs are a maybe, not good enough so some are getting phased out now, with less fluorine these get flammable too. and HFOs degrade fast, so they're basically fine but also are expensive

    the more C-F bonds and the less C-H bonds we have the less flammable thing gets, but also more stable, and by the time things get flammable it just makes more sense to switch to hydrocarbons. there are some very niche mixes that would comply with GHG requirements and are nonflammable but very few people actually need it and maybe they'll get waivers anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    That's the problem when you live in an information bubble. I clearly remember reports about the ozon layer starting regenerating.

    Why do idiots and ignorants still have that much influence? That's the real mystery!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 26 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    The orange idiot would still call it a hoax

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    Pretty sure he outright has. He also implied that his fucking building was air tight. Ya know I wonder if it hurts to be that fucking stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    I remember he was ones complaining that you can't open the windows on aircraft, so it wouldn't surprise me.

    I think the airtight building thing was him not understanding the difference between airtight and positive pressure. His building had positive pressure, if it did also been airtight it would have exploded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago

    I really like to sleep in airtight spaces when my asthma makes me sensitive to smells, so I pull a plastic bag over my head as I go to bed.

    Maybe Trump could try that technique? Its more certain than trying to airtight the whole building

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    It kills to be that stupid. However we live in a time where being stupid is no longer a mortal threat. Human medicine is just too good.

    An anti-nazi philosopher wrote about stupidity.

    ...evil, at least, understands itself. It knows what it's doing. Stupidity, on the other hand, is often blind, self-satisfied, and utterly impervious to reason.

    The laws of Nature used to sort these morons out. Sucks we haven't figured out a replacement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 24 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Same thing with acid rain. Remember acid rain? When was the last time you heard someone fear mongering about acid rain? Doesn't really happen anymore, because we passed policies reducing the sulfur content in highway and maritime fuels. Less sulfur being emitted into the atmosphere means less sulfuric acid is formed in clouds meaning the rain is less acidic. We did it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    There's still a hole, which is why NZ is melanoma capital of the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    The ozone layer: maya hi, maya hu, maya ho, maya ha ha

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I thought someone shot Matt Walsh in the neck? Oh wait it was the other guy identical to him in every aspect that matters

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    That's the problem with stupid people. When there's a crisis and people solve it they just go "see there wasn't a serious crisis", and next time they go "nothing happened last time, it's exaggerated"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Man different times. Imagine if this happened now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago

    Funny story too. They had a bounty system, you got paid for bringing in the cfc's to get rid of them. So manufacturers started quiet;y making it just to trade it in.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 weeks ago

    Matt Walsh is a walking trashcan lid flapping in the wind.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    This is one of the very few instances where every country agreed on something

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Ever seen all the news about renewable power growing exponentially? No? It's because good news is boring and noone has agenda to propagate it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    Do it will climate change - now.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    We need to bring back bullying, but just for people like Matt Walsh

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago

    You can’t fix stupid.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›