say the thing on the lemmy to get the points that don’t matter

but you have to tell him its not ai so he knows if he can like it or not, you see.

You’re the second person to have said that.

Really the best thing about AI is that it made everybody stop trying to make vr a thing as much, because you’re right, the use cases are already spelled out and it’s pretty much a dud (in terms of being shoehorned into everything).

The joke before was on the level of “I’m not a doctor but my degree in the wall thinks I am”; it didn’t have anything to do with sex just a stupid (which is key) play on words, totally a dad joke.

Sure, again, maybe. This is a bit of an odd complaint to make on a thread about Dr who though.

Hey til there’s actual peace in the world can we stop giving this prize to politicians?

Well maybe yeah on some level. It could be a fun thing is we could theoretically extend our shows as long as we wanted or whatever, maybe? But I am more saying I don’t think the tech actually works that way, it just seems like it does. Like ChatGPT doesn’t have the literal millions of unique jokes it would actually take to replace anyone who really writes jokes, it’s a lake that’s an inch deep.

I think the issue with this isn’t whether an ai can generate an episode, can it generate hundreds of coherent episodes that are actually entertaining?

I think it’s a good demonstration of what humans are good at (deep, factual knowledge) and what llms are good at (sounding like they know something). It just has nothing to do with breaking the system

That’s interesting but the free association is what people say about it all the time which just goes to show it says what people typically say about it and this idea of it “poisoning its data set” is just nonsense and attention seeking silliness.

Number one reason I never accept meeting invites (I just decline if I can’t go), totally insane it works that way.