FWIW it wasted a few moments of my time wondering what point they were trying to make.

This reply is time well spent, that's totally different.

I cheated once in my youth and learned the lesson real fucking hard. Personally I prefer the zero one many rule.

Meteorites, on other hand, are the leading cause of death. Most heart attacks and cancers are also caused by scary meteorites and their radiation.

But the thing is she's not gonna say "no", she would never say "no" because of the implication.

They were always just playing stupid. These are lawyers who are much smarter than the average person. They're controlled opposition.

Drifting towards the wrong Star franchise, we are.

Unless you're an expert on a topic for which most people are dreadfully misinformed. Then you're so exhausted from constantly fighting the tide that you'll only speak up when it seems like somebody might actually listen.

For the down voters

The philosophy at my company has become "create technical debt, then declare technical bankruptcy and rewrite with severe breaking changes".

What drives me nuts is that they're still getting diplomas from good schools, so now interviews are a grueling multi-day gauntlet.

Ask the student to explain how their program works in front of the class, with time for questions at the end.

They'll still be able to start with vibe code, but they'll be forced to actually think.

I can forgive the modern reliance on LLMs, but anyone creating software still needs to understand how it actually works, or else it will come out as garbage. Games are no exception.