That's an interesting comparison, thanks! I'll think about this.

I've been familiar with the Singularity for a long time now and this "recent" perspective by AI investors bewilders me. There's no profit to be had there - you can't enslave a god. 💀

They're from TV shows and a movie, but they all allow travel to siblings directly.

If the average number of occupants isn't changing, then cohabitation and second houses are irrelevant to this discussion.

To whom is the apartment being sold?

• If it's another landlord, then supply and demand haven't changed.
• If it's anyone's former tenant, then both supply and demand are reduced by 1 on average, so rentals don't get more expensive.

Perhaps you can find some statistics to back up your general point? If you're right, then we should see the opposite correlation - higher homeownership with higher rents.

People we call "AcidBurn" are the absolute worst.

Don't worry, I'm not talking about you.

Some might claim it's more relevant today than it originally was

There's still somebody running that AI. They've created a new role like a priest, except you never see his face. Unless he wants you to.

That's just a distraction from the Epstein files!

How do these multiverses work? Sliders rules, Loki rules, Everything Everywhere All At Once rules? We might just call it a timeline, or a frequency, or something based on how one detects or travels between them.

Not when we're looking at large groups of people - there's no reason to think the average number of occupants per home would change.

The new homeowner is the renter removed from the market, not the previous renter.

It does remove another renter, though. The market would only be tighter if they reduced supply by more than demand.