People we call "AcidBurn" are the absolute worst.
Don't worry, I'm not talking about you.
People we call "AcidBurn" are the absolute worst.
Don't worry, I'm not talking about you.
Some might claim it's more relevant today than it originally was
There's still somebody running that AI. They've created a new role like a priest, except you never see his face. Unless he wants you to.
That's just a distraction from the Epstein files!
How do these multiverses work? Sliders rules, Loki rules, Everything Everywhere All At Once rules? We might just call it a timeline, or a frequency, or something based on how one detects or travels between them.
Not when we're looking at large groups of people - there's no reason to think the average number of occupants per home would change.
The new homeowner is the renter removed from the market, not the previous renter.
It does remove another renter, though. The market would only be tighter if they reduced supply by more than demand.
There will be fewer people renting, by necessity, but the people who want or need to rent will not change by as much, creating an imbalance between supply and demand that will drive up rental prices.
Why would demand not change by as much as supply, if both a buyer and a seller have been removed from the rental market? It's like landlords being forced to sell to tenants at a reduced price.
Software repositories are already perfect!
That's why Linux is better. The corporate engineers are pulling a Death Star.
When someone decides to sell a good because market conditions have changed, the price of the good goes down.
Rental prices are proportional to overall housing prices. In general, more homeowners is correlated with lower rents. Renters are also removed from the market.