437
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Kinggold@feddit.org 40 points 5 days ago

Relevant xkcd

[-] chickenf622@sh.itjust.works 66 points 5 days ago

One of those rare times where more formal math notation is more understandable than plain English. Assuming that you're not in a field where you use formal math notation all the time.

[-] stevles@aussie.zone 4 points 5 days ago

I guess it depends on your definition of plain English. I wouldn't consider the English in that to be plain, particularly as they had a typo that seemed Deliberate.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten top 10 Hot 100 hits in the top 10.

Ok. So if I'm reading this right, the word "debut" is the important word here.

"Hot 100" is the industry-standard chart of song popularity, published by Billboard. The "100" there is confusing the headline, so let's call that "THE LIST."

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten top 10 "THE LIST" hits in the top 10.

So it's impressive to get a song on THE LIST. Having it anywhere on the list is genuinely impressive. But it's more impressive to hit the Top Ten of THE LIST. We'll call those songs "SUPERHITS."

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten "SUPERHITS" on "THE LIST" as "SUPERHITS."

As impressive as having a song that becomes a SUPERHIT is, it's even more impressive for your song to start there, right as soon as it's come out, without needing to work its way up from the bottom. Let's call those "LIGHTNING BOLTS." Also, everything we're taking about is on THE LIST, we can collapse that repetitive term now.

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to have exclusively "LIGHTNING BOLTS" as her first ten "SUPERHITS."

So, no SUPERHITS that weren't LIGHTNING BOLTS. But a quick look at Wikipedia shows that she's had 13 singles (which...wow, I thought she'd been around longer than that), which means she's released three songs that were never SUPERHITS. Either they got on THE LIST but peaked at 11 or lower, or they never made THE LIST at all.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago

You make the world a better place. Thank you.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

You're very kind, thank you.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I concur, that was excellent.

[-] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 44 points 5 days ago

While I absolutely love the math explanation, the 'plain English' one is not comprehensible because there's a mistake or a typo:

Olivia Rodrigo becomes the first woman in history to debut her first ten ~~top 10~~ Hot 100 hits in the top 10.

[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

So her first 10 songs that got into the hot 100 were in place 1-10? I'm still confused.

She's had ten songs make it onto the Hot 100 list, and all ten of them were in the top ten. None debuted at #11 or below.

[-] droans@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Sven said, "Ted, send ten tents."

Ted said, "Sven, send ten cents."

When Sven sent Ted ten cents,

then Ted sent Sven ten tents.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago

Sounds like fraud

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] binarytobis@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

To be honest, I didn’t understand either explanation until I saw yours.

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

That's incorrect. The criteria is that the records were in the top 10 at some time and started in the top 10 right away. Rodrigo is the first to achieve both with her first ten records that were ever in the top 10. In theory, she might've had other songs that were in the top 100 but not top 10.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 35 points 5 days ago

All Olivia's singles that made it into the Top 10 also debuted within the Top 10, a first for a female artist in the top Hot 100 chart.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Does the Hot 100 have any relevance here? If she's in the Top 10, that would already imply Hot 100?

[-] needanke@feddit.org 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I guess Hot 100 is the brand name of the charts here.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Right, I guess "Top 10" isn't a thing just the top of the Hot 100.

[-] dunyol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah, the headline is talking about the Billboard Hot 100, a chart of the 100 most popular songs of the week.

The news about her songs being in the “top 10” just means that all her charting singles appeared for the first time in one of the first 10 positions.

I just checked the chart on the Billboard website and it’s now at number 12, but it debuted last week at the first position.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It's important because the achievement requires that none of her other singles made the top 100 prior to climbing to the top 10.

It also feels like it's not exactly an honor. It's saying she's popular, so the songs are instantly top 10 regardless of their quality, whereas songs that climbing to the top are more likely to be songs that catch on and become more popular because people listen to, enjoy, and share them.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 27 points 5 days ago

Olivia Rodrigo Becomes the First Woman in History to Have Her First 10 Songs to Reach the Hot 100 Chart to Debut in the Top 10

How hard was that?

[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

The hardest obstacle wasn't logic, but the max. char limit /s

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 6 points 5 days ago

If I would've had more time I would written a shorter ~~letter~~ headline

[-] Abyssian@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

I have two degrees and still need a chart to map out the translation. I guess it's my own fault for choosing degrees in charts and making those full room size conspiracy maps with the yarn that you see in movies.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Her first 10 top-10 songs debuted there. This is notable because many top-10 songs don't start there, they build up to that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

10/10. Would Olivian again.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago
[-] lena@gregtech.eu 22 points 5 days ago
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago

Well I didn't vote for her

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 13 points 5 days ago

You don't vote for Olivians!

[-] Klear@piefed.world 9 points 5 days ago

Well, how do they become (10, 10)-Olivian?

[-] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 days ago

Did some watery tart throw a scimitar at her?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

I voted for Kodos

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't understand how this woman is popular. All she does in her music is whine and cry about greasy ex boyfriend with the Gen Z broccoli hair. And yet it's an extremely successful formula for her.

It's like, why you gotta have such low standards, girl? You're rich, famous, and pretty; you can do way better than him.

[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

I find a lot of celebrities also have terrible qualities

[-] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

So what you are saying is she needs to find an attractive guy with a great personality with low enough standards or poor enough self esteem to date her for very vapid qualities despite her personality (I’m guessing)

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

How many of them were also

k-pop

...I'll see myself out.

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

The person who wrote the translation has had to break down concepts for undergrads before.

[-] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 4 points 5 days ago

None of this makes any sense to me

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

I'm an old guy. I have no idea who she is.

"I used to be with ‘it’, but then they changed what ‘it’ was. Now what I’m with isn’t ‘it’ anymore and what’s ‘it’ seems weird and scary to me."

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
437 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

11979 readers
2056 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS