Researchers at UNSW Sydney have harnessed the power of ultrasonic sound waves to make espresso-strength coffee with room temperature water, cutting energy use by up to 75%.
post
I wonder if this method produces less acidic coffee, like cold brewing does?
while ultrasound can do some weird things, article says
Their research, published in the Journal of Food Engineering, included blind taste-testing experiments which showed that their ultrasonic room-temperature version of espresso was undistinguishable from coffee shots brewed in the traditional way.
Except cold... Why would someone drink a cold expresso? It just seems kinda gross, then again, I'm not a fan of putting cheese in my coffee either (different strokes for different folks I guess).
Espresso is often served over an ice cube in Spain, and it’s fuckin great, to use the technical term. If it’s hot, I’m all for the cold and tasty
At that point I would think it's more of an americano (espresso and hot water) that's been mishandled, but that's just my opinion. I've never been a fan of cold coffee though I always end up drinking some before I'm done in the morning.
You’ve clearly never had it. You neck it immediately, it’s an espresso shot, but instantly cooled by flowing over an ice cube. It’s not watered down any significant amount, you don’t wait for the ice cube to melt, you’re missing how much latent energy there is in the change between frozen and liquid in ice. There’s plenty to cool a small shot without melting the whole thing. It keeps the sweetness and even most of the texture of the original shot, it’s just not hot, it’s worth trying
Who tf puts cheese in their coffee
Fancy Cold brewing = oily coffee diarrhea
“Cold brewing concentrates the essential oils…” “This single shot of espresso is equal to 3 shots or something stupid…”
So you take whatever is good and end up shitting out liquid coal…
Not sure how I feel about this. There is no real logic to my resistance on the idea, but I have some.
I don't really get it to be honest. It's pretty pointless if you don't want room temperature coffee, or no.
Perfect for iced coffee though
Better. Perfect would be using chilled water. I'm on a limited connection right now so I can't investigate, but I'm curious to know if they tested.
They're talking about commercial scale coffee products and coffee flavoured products (bottled coffee drinks, instant coffee, etc.), where a reduction of 75% of the energy consumption could not only be very profitable, but also helpful in hitting environmental targets. Coffee is already a bit of an environmental nightmare when it comes to water usage in farming, so lessening the impact of commercial coffee is definitely a plus.
if all that energy is used to boil water and we're cutting that energy use by 3/4 then it's saving 70Wh (not kWh) per litre, or 70kWh per cubic meter. that's not much
You can heat the water afterwards. A lot of the heat in the hot water is lost in the beans. This might never have an application at your local coffee shop, but for canned coffee it will make a dramatic difference in profitability.
One day my wife at McStarbucks:
Yes, can I have a grande pamuchino with double cherry smoothie foam over a choco layer at 47KHz please?
I like to think the person who revealed this to the public was like "Good news, everyone!" like Prof Farnsworth
Piezotransducer? As in the little thing that makes electronics beep and buzz?
Yeah basically, but at a much higher frequency since it's ultrasound. Human hearing tops out at 20khz, and this would be close to 50khz
I found one for sale that does 40k that has the same form factor as the one shown in the paper. I almost want to make a high-speed coldbrew system but I don't expect it'd be worthwhile for the coffee, only maybe for the fun of building it.
all 50 comments