1
2
3
4
5
 
 

In October 2025, Sereno and several other paleontologists published a paper on the newly discovered “mummy zone” in western North America. It’s an unusually thick section of the Lance Formation that was predisposed to pristinely preserving dinosaur bodies

Rex Junior is a mummified dinosaur skeleton. It was found at the top of the mummy zone that also produced other mummified dinosaurs from eastern Wyoming, including several Edmontosaurus from the Zerbst Ranch.

However, simply calling Rex Junior “mummified” isn’t doing the specimen justice, from Sereno’s perspective.

What immediately stood out to him was that Rex Junior was three-dimensionally preserved. None of the articulated bones are squashed, distorted, or scattered.

It was like the dinosaur went to sleep, completely undisturbed.

“It’s a particularly interesting case because (the body) does not look dried,” Sereno said. “The mummies that we described in the paper look dried, like they’d been exposed for several days or weeks before being covered by a flood. (Rex Junior) doesn’t look like that.”

Sereno noted that Rex Junior isn’t just three-dimensionally preserved – it’s perfectly three-dimensionally preserved. The articulated arm, in particular, is preserved in what he called “a lifelike position.”

This is one instance where Sereno said “lifelike” is unnatural.

“When you die as a carcass, there's skin sagging. The hands are pulled up in a deathlike pose. The body dries out like beef jerky. I think the position of the hands and ribs is too natural. It’s preserved in a lifelike position.”

That’s exactly what Sereno speculates might have happened. Rex Junior couldn’t be buried as a carcass, because the dinosaur wasn’t dead when it was buried.

“I personally believe that it was buried alive in a flood,” he said. “I don't think it was a carcass. This looks like it was breathing when it was suddenly buried, like it didn’t have a chance to escape.”

6
7
8
9
 
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/scientificarticles/p/1424675/why-are-men-more-likely-than-women-to-get-cancer-it-may-depend-where-you-are

Men around the world are more likely to get cancer than women, but why? Chinese scientists say unhealthy lifestyles and pre-existing illnesses may explain most of the discrepancy between Chinese men and women, but these differences appear to be less important when investigating why cancer affects more British men than women. The team analysed health data on nearly 135,000 Chinese people and just over 455,000 Brits, looking at 34 cancers and lifestyle factors, including smoking, heavy drinking, physical inactivity, and diet, as well as pre-existing health conditions including chronic liver disease, diabetes, and obesity. They found that, together, these factors accounted for 84% of the male - female gap in China, but just 26% among Britons. The findings suggest the factors affecting the gender gap in cancer may differ from country to country, so intervention strategies should be tailored to local populations, the authors conclude.

10
11
12
13
 
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/scientificarticles/p/1422114/oral-menopausal-hormone-therapy-commonly-known-as-hormone-replacement-therapy-or-hrt-lin

Study.

Conversely, stroke and heart attack risks were limited to prolonged use of high-dose oral hormone therapy, while transdermal hormone therapy (delivered via the skin as patches, gels, or sprays) showed no general increased blood clot risk.

14
15
16
 
 
17
18
 
 

The species is capable of reproducing at 145°F and continuing to move up to temperatures of 147°F -- a record for complex eukaryotic life -- though after this summer 147 doesn't even seem that extreme.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
view more: next ›