95
submitted 13 hours ago by hellinkilla@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/54341

By Alan MacLeod  –  Jun 2, 2026

Amid widespread and growing public opposition to the Israeli genocide of Gaza and South Lebanon, a controversial new bill seeks to formally integrate the U.S. and Israeli militaries like never before, making it difficult to tell where one ends and the other begins.

Section 224 of the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) proposes to join the two forces together at the hip, laying the groundwork for extensive cooperation into “seemingly every manner of U.S.-Israeli military-industrial complex cooperation,” according to the Institute for Responsible Statecraft.

This includes the research, development, and production of modern, hi-tech arms, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, drones, directed energy, cyber, and autonomous weapons systems. It would compel the United States to integrate Israeli arms and technologies into its defense supply chain, and fuse the countries’ data capturing and storage facilities together, meaning that Israel could have access to essentially all the U.S. military’s data.

The bill also requires the creation of a new position within the Department of Defense: an executive agent whose role is to coordinate cooperation and integration between the two parties.

In essence, then, it would dramatically change the relationship between the two states, from one where Washington supplies Tel Aviv with money, weapons, and diplomatic support, to a situation where the two are fundamentally intertwined.

It would also make the relationship far less transparent, as aid to Israel currently requires an annual public debate and vote. However, by moving it away from the political realm into that of defense acquisition, oversight and accountability mechanisms will be removed, and the public will have little right to know the details going forward.

Judging by its sponsors, Section 224 has strong support on Capitol Hill. It was put forward by Mike Rogers (R-AL), Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and Adam Smith (D-WA), the panel’s highest-ranking Democrat. It is surely, therefore, a formality that it will pass the House Armed Services Committee, before being taken to Congress and the Senate.

Analysts have noted that, if passed, the bill will “extraordinarily” expand Israeli influence in domestic American politics, giving Tel Aviv the opportunity to pull powerful political levers through the tried and tested method of offering jobs. As the Institute for Responsible Statecraft warn, by expanding or starting new arms production facilities like they already have in Mississippi and Arkansas, the Israeli government could use the influence of bringing jobs to districts to buy the support of American members of Congress.

The news that a new bill could essentially fuse together the U.S. and Israeli militaries has been met with pushback online, but provoked little comment in Washington, D.C. One lawmaker who has spoken up in Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie. “If the provision in the NDAA to integrate/synchronize the U.S. and Israeli militaries (section 224) makes it out of committee, I’ll offer an amendment to strip it from the bill on the floor. We are a sovereign country,” he said on Saturday.

The US Cannot Go to War With China Without China

Massie, a strong critic of U.S. support for Israel, recently lost his primary to challenger Ed Gallrein, after AIPAC and other Israel Lobby groups flooded the race with tens of millions of dollars, making it the most expensive contest in American history.

The U.S. already provides Israel with enormous amounts of military aid, having sent hundreds of billions of dollars worth of weapons since 1948. Since 2008, it is required by law to protect Israel’s “qualitative military edge,” by supplying it with advanced weaponry. Section 224, however, would transform and deepen this relationship, making it all-but-impossible to democratically break the U.S.-Israel special relationship.

That alliance is under increased scrutiny, as support for Israel is collapsing across the United States.
A new poll published by Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies found that 60% of Americans (including 75% of respondents under 30 years old) hold a negative view of the country. When asked, a large plurality says that Israel holds too much sway over American politics and politicians.

A 2025 study found that half of American voters believe Israel is carrying out a genocide against its neighbors in West Asia. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant, among others, on charges of crimes against humanity.

The United States, however, has refused to accept the ICC’s actions, attempted to shut down proceedings, and imposed sanctions on the court. ICC prosecutor Karim Khan stated that Senior U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham – one of Netanyahu’s closest allies in Washington – told him that his court is only “for African thugs like [Russian president Vladimir] Putin. It is not for democracies like Israel and the United States of America.”

The response from the governments of Israel and the United States to the increasing opposition to the genocide has been to crack down on dissent and to censor social media. As Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of pro-Israel pressure group, the Anti-Defamation League stated, “We really have a TikTok problem, a Gen Z problem.” The Trump administration forced through the sale of TikTok to the family of Larry Ellison, a passionately pro-Israel tech billionaire who is the largest private funder of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).

Ellison, no doubt, will support Section 224. Yet the effective merger between the U.S. military and the IDF will have profound consequences for the future of America, and should provoke stiff opposition nationwide. Whether it passes will depend largely on the nature and scale of that opposition.

(MintPress News)


From Orinoco Tribune via This RSS Feed.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 21 points 8 hours ago

Fifty-first state speed run!

Oh boy I’m so excited for the future

[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 20 points 9 hours ago

When have two nations ever combined their militaries? Coordinating and fighting campaigns together, sure. But at no point has there been something like this. Might as well make them officially a state at that point, not like it could top the level of influence they're working towards by basically being a military industrial complex merged with a state that has its own lobby. This is how the MIC has so much control over the US as it is, by employing people in every single district in the country. Which is also kinda funny because their products are like the propeller beanie of the arms industry - look at the desert eagle for a prime example.

I don't think this will work out well even if it does pass. The US gov relies on Israel to spy on it's own people because they don't have the restrictions and don't have to go through the courts. They also use this for plausible deniability.

Whatever, fuck it, we're getting cum squads.

[-] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 8 points 7 hours ago

Doesn't the US have control of either Japan or South Korea's military if there's ever a war through some sort of agreement? This seems way worse, though.

[-] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 6 points 3 hours ago

It was set to have absolute control of South Korea's in the event of a war there, all the way from South Korea's founding until a few years ago. Last I heard, the current policy is for the US to have joint command lenin-dont-laugh with South Korea over their military in the event of a war there now.

[-] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 12 points 8 hours ago

Well shit now we're gonna be hearing about a 3 state solution.

[-] THEPH0NECOMPANY@hexbear.net 16 points 9 hours ago
[-] segfault11@hexbear.net 19 points 10 hours ago

it’s like that chapo bit where two large nephews do the fusion dance but irl

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 21 points 10 hours ago

The Onion has it's work cut out for them.

[-] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 25 points 11 hours ago

So nothing will fundamentally change?

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 47 points 10 hours ago

If I understand correctly, it allows them to transfer arms and funds to Israel without creating a paper trail, hiding it all in the pentagon's budget.

It also shreds the (transparent, non-existent) fig leaf of plausible deniability the US might have otherwise claimed.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 35 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The Biden administration hid its support for Israel within the limitations of being able to avoid disclosing materiel and funds transfers below a certain amount sent directly by the president. This however limited the total quantity that could be sent because going over that amount would force it to be disclosed (i think via congress but w/e the mechanism doesn't matter that much).

This will change it so they can send any amount and always hide it. If it's part of the pentagon command then it's part of the US military and within their budget.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 32 points 12 hours ago

Bipartisanship!

Judging by its sponsors, Section 224 has strong support on Capitol Hill. It was put forward by Mike Rogers (R-AL), Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and Adam Smith (D-WA), the panel’s highest-ranking Democrat. It is surely, therefore, a formality that it will pass the House Armed Services Committee, before being taken to Congress and the Senate.

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 10 points 8 hours ago

Kshama Sawant is running against Adam Smith. idk her chances of winning but it's great that she's challenging this ghoul.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 32 points 13 hours ago

Yeah fuck all that.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
95 points (100.0% liked)

news

24779 readers
513 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS