134
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

So there is hope. If Trump is sufficiently pissed off about Israel, this could be a turning point to clarify that AIPAC is a foreign agent influencing US politics.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Would be great to actually hear it, otherwise I am just going to chalk this up to creative propaganda.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago
[-] Drusas@fedia.io 57 points 1 day ago

US President Trump accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of being the reason for global hatred of Israel in an angry call on Monday....

Wow, he's actually right about something.

[-] Azal@pawb.social 4 points 6 hours ago

A term I heard growing up was "Even a blind pig finds an acorn"

[-] apftwb@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I'm glad Trump can reach across the isle, straight over centeralist Democrats, and agree with the radical left.

[-] Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 day ago

Even a stuffed cluck tells the right time twice a day.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Eh, not exactly. Netanyahu is the one running Israel, and he's making plenty of unforced errors on the international PR front, but a lot of what Israel is currently hated for would've happened no matter who was in charge. There's no realistic timeline where Israel doesn't commit genocide in Gaza; the best case scenario is that the genocide ends by late 2024 rather than getting an intermission in late 2025-early 2026. The only parts of Netanyahu's conduct that don't reflect the views of the Israeli public and political establishment are the bad PR and ignoring the hostages; putting Gazans in their place via blood and iron is largely uncontroversial.

TL;DR: Netanyahu's unforced errors are making Israel more hated than it'd have otherwise been, but the core reasons for international public opinion turning against it would've been there no matter who was in charge.

The only way that cage match would be redeemable is if them two fight it out to the death

[-] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

It would take forever though.

Neither has the stamina to choke the other out, and both would be wheezing after a few punches. After two minutes we'd be forced to sit through ages of them limply clawing at one another's adams apples and throwing limp-wristed, weightless punches in the general direction of each other's groin until random chance decides the winner via myocardial infarction.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 11 hours ago

Not if we give both of them a ~~little~~ fair amount of PCP.

[-] BranBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago
[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 7 hours ago

First we give them just under a lethal dose of PCP. While the PCP is kicking in, start playing some pump up music. Put a mask on each of them; the mask being that person’s enemy. Benny Netanyahu wears a black person mask and Trumpty wears a Palestinian mask. Put them into a room that is playing more pump up music with the speaker saying words like “fight”, “attack”, “maim”. Throw in some makeshift weapons.

Charge like $20 to watch the livestream. If we’re lucky, both of them will kill each other.

This format can also be used for billionaires.

[-] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I can see it, I think if you filled the undercard with some of the more obnoxious MAGA influencers and manosphere dorks you'd have a bankable concept here.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

Not as long as our current horrible reality

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Have the match in a small, sealed room. Give them both grenades.

[-] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

Nah, just close the door and bury the room in cement.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I don't even know who I'd want to win.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

If either of them dies, humanity wins.

[-] arschflugkoerper@feddit.org 2 points 22 hours ago

We could add a hydraulic press

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 44 points 1 day ago

I have a hard time believing anything The Jerusalem Post has to say

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Which also isn't very trustworthy. They've been constantly rushing to the presses with the US wishlist presented as a draft deal. This could easily be a ploy on behalf of the Epstein coalition.

[-] Akh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yep, pretty sure this never happened

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Eh, if they were going to lie they'd have said relations between fascist A and fascist B are as good as ever. There's no sense in putting out something like this unless it's the truth.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago
[-] RumAndCreole@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Hmmm I wonder what happen if someone had the huevos to stop sending arms to Isreal and stop defending them.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

let's put someone in charge with them, then. sure not gonna find anyone in magamagaland

[-] Krusty@quokk.au 17 points 1 day ago

Hey Bibi. I seemed to have lost my penis. I asked all the thirteen year old girls around but none have seen it recently.

Help, your friend in perpetual war crimes,

-DJT

[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Aww, another failed bromance...

It's not going to make things better, but it still feels good to see MAGA failing, every time.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Aww, another failed bromance…

Trump has no friends. Only co-conspirators and lackeys.

[-] homes@piefed.world 9 points 1 day ago

Donald Trump is crazy, and today is Monday

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Will it change something with regards of the US supporting the genocide in Gaza and Lebanon? No?

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
134 points (94.7% liked)

politics

29941 readers
2010 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS