- "OP is not gay"
- *Brings example from ancient Greece*
I love how the 'source' link is actually named 'sauce'. Error? Maybe. Fitting? Absolutely!

There was a trend pre covid of using different S words instead of "source". "Salsa", "salami", etc.
This is a decades old trend for 4 chan. I remember people asking for the "sauce" in 2012.
I don't get it, I've always thought men were the grossest, and I am a man.
Takes all kinds, Nick, it's okay to find men more attractive; some think 800-pounders are irresistible.
One lives in his basement and never showers and the other has all gay friends whom are nazies thru and thru.
These two deserve each other, fucking losers.
Incel losers clearly have attractiveness that is off the charts and too intimidating for anybody male or female to deal with. It's so bad they can't even fuck each other, because of the sheer levels of attractiveness involved.
"naturally attractive" do these idiots seriously think that attractiveness is objective?
Not objective, natural lol!
but if theyre naturally attractive then that means that attractive is the same for everyone
cant be naturally attractive because attractiveness is subjective
Wind can be a nice breeze or a deathtrap. Natural doesn't mean same. it means natural.
But I wasn't even talking about the actual meaning. I was making a joke based on his original tweet.
For an equally unscientific, vibes based counter-argument (not to be taken seriously): Would it not stand to reason that a highly intelligent social species like humans (that also lacks obvious physical features intended to attract a mate, like the peacock's feathers) would select a partner that is good at being social (ie. not being an arsehole) and that this is where these incels fail?
Iirc Sapolksy’s lectures point out that according to sociological studies, humans are pretty much smack dab in the middle when it comes to the attraction generated by men that give ”muscular territorial fighters” vs the ones giving “soft caretakers”.
So it depends on the individual if they're more into peacocks or empathetic men.
that is the most offhand justification for being gay ever
But still a valid justification for being gay. And I'd hazard it's a requirement that you find men far more attractive than women. Because if you don't, then you are merely Bi, (and might have the best of all worlds-- we need more science on that I think).
best of all worlds
no, thats being pansexual and polyamorous
Hmmm that sounds pretty gay you guys
No, no. It's scientific
"I'm not gay, its perfectly natural and totally hetro-masculine to get a boner over chiseled, glistening men.. Its just science!"
I had a deeply religious room mate freshman year of college. He watched 300 at least 5 times in theaters and IDK how many times on DVD. I can only assume for the glistening chiseled men because its not that good. I always thought he was repressing his desires and this was the only way he could let them out at the time.
These two really need to just kiss already.

The hood stays on
I feel like Fuentes is probably out of the Rat King's league. He seems to have at least heard of a toothbrush, and Ashley St. Clair claims that he's much better read than most online fascists (which tracks with what I've seen of him, he's at least aware of history and politics even if his conclusions are batshit).
The argument about birds is ignorant because of basic behaviour ecology. Arguing from Zahavis handicap hypothesis males display strength by giving themselves a handicap. Being highly visible, lumbered with pointless feathers.
Females are camouflaged since they often are the ones on the nest.
Thought this was a shitpost at first
I'm not gay but the man i sleep with is.
Studies have shown that at least half of all homosexual are gay.
Of the two people on earth that shouldn't be judging others on their looks, I would wager asmongold and Fuentes would be in the top 5. They look like walking herpes outbreaks.
asmongold yeah but fuentes' attractiveness is only bogged down by his personality/politics and that stupid haircut. fix those problems and he's chained to my radiator.
and hes likely not into women.
You should probably chain him to your radiator anyways.
This isn't me being gay, it's science
It can also be you being ultra, super-duper, neon pink gay.
Isn't the Greek statues being male thing also partly because they didn't generally hold feminity in high regard compared to masculinity? Or was that the Romans?
Women were seen as inferior men simply needed for the continuation of the species
Just come out the closet guys, but make sure to make it a stream goal first 🤣🤣🤣
If you polled 100 bi people, I’d be surprised if you got fewer than 90 who said that they find women more attractive on average.
I'm an outlier; I realized that the more androgynous someone is, the hotter they are. If I can't tell what you are, I'm turned on.
So stupid. Arguing from a patriarchal society's beauty standards and not even noticing.
it is like saying males need to display toxic masculinity to make up for lacking any interesting character traits.
Oh shit, that's what I was missing.
Are we going to completely ignore the fact that male birds are prettied up SPECIFICALLY TO IMPRESS THEIR LADY COUNTERPARTS? Holy mother of fuck
Like biologically these critters by and large are programmed to behave in “please like me and have babies” ways. If these dorks are going to make those comparisons they’d better start building impressive houses and wearing colorful clothes to make women happy.
"no homo, but I like dudes"
Unless it's from Nietzsche
Individuals are beautiful or ugly based on what an individual likes/dislikes. Not an entire gender. And no one has ever needed makeup, that is a choice, not a requirement. Putting makeup on someone you find repulsive will not make them acceptable, how stupid these people are.
These guys are so gay and so closeted they don’t even know it themselves.
Men and women. Males and females. Girls and boys. People are obsessed with gender to the point they forget we're all just human.
Last night I was watching these two chuds watch one of my favourite movies (Children of Men) and one of them, responding to Julianne Moore's character's behaviour said "Ah, I HATE women like that!" and it genuinely caused my brain to skip a beat. There was nothing about the character's actions that was specific to female behaviour. I don't understand why he couldn't have said "I hate PEOPLE like that."
I am an aspiring writer. I did a beta reader swap with one of my colleagues who just like me would like to be a sci-fi author. He was desperate to know how I was "so good" at writing women. Dude, lol, it's not hard. Literally all you have to do to avoid all the men-writing-women pitfalls is remember that women are human beings first and women second, with all the same desires, hopes and fears as men.
Microblog Memes
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES: