The questionnaire respondents are requested to leave those out. See my other comment. I dug up some detail.
Clinton signed his crime bill
I wasn't familiar, thanks for the pointer. This rhetoric "though on crime" has been going on from before my birth it seems.
We cannot take our country back until we take our neighborhoods back. Four years ago this crime issue was used to divide America. I want to use it to unite America. I want to be tough on crime and good for civil rights. You can't have civil justice without order and safety.
I'm unfamiliar with the term field arrest. If I get this right, this is what happens when you get arrested for a misdemeanour on site, cited and then immediately let go? Possibly with a requirement of turning up to a police station for booking, or to a court date?
I read a bit of the paper, and it seems they are simply using the data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997.
The relevant NLS topical guide says the following:
NLSY97 youth respondents are asked whether they have ever been arrested by the police or taken into custody for an illegal or delinquent offense (not including arrests for minor traffic violations) and the total number of times this has happened.
And looking up the phrasing in the questionnaire is also exactly the same
Have you ever been arrested by the police or taken into custody for an illegal or delinquent offense (do not include arrests for minor traffic violations)?
So I guess it would depend on whether respondents consider a field arrest an arrest and report it.
All of those sound insanely high. If you take a group of 10 random adult men from the US, roughly four of them have been arrested?
Is a lot of it for underage drinking because that law is so far from lived reality?
I think that makes sense too. Sure a drunk cyclist is less of a problem than a drunk motor vehicle operator.
But as the third party you still don't want 100 kg (200 pounds) of dude and aluminium frame running into you at 20 km/h (12.4 mph), if you are a pedestrian, a second cyclist, or a biker.
Yikes. Did he make through?
Betznau hat das Problem, dass die einfach gar keinen Kühlturm haben. Da geht die ganze Abwärme in die Aare. Und die dürfen sie nicht überhitzen weil sonst die Fische verrecken. Ich habe in den letzten Tagen paarmal versucht rauszukriegen wieso das Kraftwerk keinen Kühlturm hat, aber so eine Frage kann man einfach nicht gut googlen.
Was mich etwas wundert ist, dass Golfech offenbar dasselbe Problem hat, obwohl dort gemäss der Wikipediabilder Kühltürme stehen. Hier in der Pressemitteilung sagen sie, dass das abgeleitete Wasser 0.2°C wärmer ist.
Die Axpo sagt in ihrer Pressemitteilung hingegen, dass der ganze Fluss um 0.7°C bis 1°C erwärmt wird. Also schon 'ne andere Hausnummer.
“If they want people to work 80 hours a month, they’d need to bring in a lot more jobs,” he says.
Why 80 hours? Is that a threshold that has taken on a specific meaning in the US political discord? Otherwise it seems a little random, that's like a 50% employment, right?
Yeah I know, I'm watching the 1 million stream :-D
3 days ago: debut stream
2 days ago: karaoke stream
today: 1 million sub stream
It's crazy! Dooby and Nimi have respectable half million and two thirds millions after a few months, and Saba just blows right past. But I suppose it was to be expected based on previous numbers.
Don’t break userspace.
That's a kernel saying. A bit unfitting to repeat it for the distro that builds said userspace.
The argument is utterly stupid.
Ignoring that it is building on a fantasy reality for the moment. Even if you had free healthcare, and if only the financial costs of survival motivated people to get jobs, then the other costs of living, like for food and shelter, would still provide that motivation.
Wow that's fucked. In my country the kids going to school is the parents legal responsibility, they can actually get fined if the child is delinquent. But never would the child be arrested.
I'm very sorry that happened to you, both the sexual assault and the police treatment.