Who did the retraction is also important. An author voluntarily retracting their own paper is different from the journal retracting the paper.
Socialism as in Norway, not Stalin.
It should be pointed out that Norway is not socialist. It's a social democracy/capitalist country.
Just because something is a social construct doesn't mean it's a bad thing to be ignored.
Being alive is a social construct. Humans decided that some things counted as alive, and other things did not. Nature doesn't care if a bunch of chemical reactions are happening inside a cell, or in a glass tube. It has no objective definition of "alive".
XKCD is literally stick figures, for example, and has more or less remained stick figures since its inception.
Sort of? Someone was editing his face to be more round and babylike. This was one of them.
On the bright side, the camera/Switch doesn't use a proprietary connector, so you can plug a lot of cameras into the thing, and it will generally work.
It's not like the DS days, where if you wanted to plug a microphone in in addition to your headphones, they had a special connector for the mic part.
Exactly, scientists have been saying this forever but evil oversized bipedal crocs sell.
It honestly feels like a marketing issue more than anything. A non-zero amount of people think modern dinosaurs are "boring" because they don't look like Jurassic Park.
Compared to big fluffy unicorn pigeons that eat each other.
Like people would happily be swooped by a magpie if given the chance.
A knee-high raptor who will happily leap up and bite chunks off of larger prey whilst they're still alive and kicking seems like it would retain much of the terror.
Eve if he suddenly no longer had influence over Tesla, he's ruined their reputation enough that others have had time to catch up and make better vehicles.
The parallels between Musk and Stark seemed perfect on paper. Both are billionaire tech innovators with a flair for the dramatic and dreams of changing the world.
They're not, though. Stark is a rare engineering powerhouse who personally pushed past a lot of engineering boundaries, and Musk is an investor/programmer who mostly puts his name on existing things.
I might change my mind if Musk personally invents AGI, nanobots, and a previously-unknown clean energy source capable of powering a 1/3rd of NYC with a room no larger than a foyer, like Stark did, but I'm not holding out much by way of hopes.
You say that like A/S/L wasn't a thing back in the day.
T156
0 post score0 comment score
They said the child was using to "get out of anything and everything", including wearing socks, which implicitly argues it to be a bad thing.
The child is more or less saying that because something is a social construct, that means that they do not have to follow it.