119
I say we compromise with this entrepreneurial fella; he can own as many homes as he wants, but he has to simultaneously occupy them all at once 
Ah, so we cut him into enough pieces to put one in each house?
If he doesn't figure out the math on how to stay in one piece it's his fault
I'm a tenant with zero homes- I'm hiking up to an overlook to release The Device
then die
“How dare you tell me to stop eating other people’s resources! I shall do more in protest!”
Literally the same mindset they whine unions have. Literally them ruining lives over a temper tantrum.
Pigs are my least favorite animal.
That's a nice argument kulak, unfortunately for you straight to the Gulag
i look forward to not reading his obituary
Okay, very good. Now face the wall please.
This is the type of douchebag that sees Patrick Bateman and Gordon Gecko as role models.
Crucially for James, part of the legislation says landlords must stick to no more than the advertised rent price – which he says makes it illogical to advertise a low price, because then if it’s far lower than market rate, nobody can bid even slightly more.
For his sitting tenants, he has been pushing up rents by up to 5 per cent.
But for new listings, when his current tenants have moved out, he’s going much higher
Mao please. Come back.
My city has rent control, but there's a carve-out that any building built within the past 51 years is exempt from the caps 🙃
If what he is saying is true, this logic is a much worse prospect for landlords ideologically.
Rather than trying to argue the price rises are a moral matter in which he is simply greedy, which would leave landlords room for a hypothetical "good ,fair, generous landlord" argument, instead he focuses on the structural problem with a housing market.
In order to generate profits from rent, to mitigate milquetoast rental reform, and to stay above absorption from banks/ interest rates/competing landlords' capitals , he must siphon surplus value from workers at an increasing rate that ultimately drags the rest of the productive economy. In effect production as a whole must subsidise private landowners who's only real merit is holding a deed.
This is exactly the kind of argument I would prefer capitalists to make as it lays bare the unthinking mechanics of capitalism, and we can put forth a concrete and scientific critique (Marxism).
I sometimes wonder why there isn't more of a class devide between landlord and capitalists. Like you said (and like even Adam Smith said) landlords are a drain on productive society. So shouldn't capitalism get rid of them? But then of course I remember they are almost the same class. The owners of the means of production often own property, that they rent out and owners of land and houses often hold investments of productive (or finance) capital. In times of crisis, they can shift from one to the other. Many rented properties are means of production and housing is a means of reproduction, a distinction that was introduced to scam and divide the working class anyway.
Edit: I focused too much on US here but I think the same applies to UK
There is no independent landlord class in the US. It is finance capital which speculates on land, with the aim to extract economic rent. But the distinction has vanished between speculation on this or any other financial asset; the speculator is indifferent to the asset itself and cares only about the yield derived from it.
There is a meaningful class divide between industrial capital and finance capital. It’s just that finance capital won years ago especially in the US. Whatever is left of industrial capital in the US has no ability to fight against finance capital, and is gradually bought up and hollowed out by finance capital via corporate takeover, offshoring, and outsourcing. Industrial capital in this way is transformed into finance capital. In the name of “cutting costs” the physical locus of productive labor is moved to global south, with only a kernel of bean-counters left in the home country to “manage” the “investment”. This is the main kind of “work” that occurs in the imperial core. It is why it is called neocolonialism, because formally it is not very different from the “management” by colonial powers over their colonies.
Spitballing here, but I think the primary contradiction in US political economy is finance capital opposed to itself. The entire world economy, including China btw (although this is changing over the past two decades), depends on export to the US for consumption. By extracting too much monopoly rent, it undermines the consumer class that necessarily must purchase overpriced shit. If no one can afford to buy their overpriced shit, it all falls apart. Up til now this contradiction has been papered over by imperialism, by exporting the effects of this monopoly rent extraction to the Global South, through inflated wages for imperial core workers to cover the inflated prices.
Thanks, all of this makes total sense to me.
In the name of “cutting costs” the physical locus of productive labor is moved to global south, with only a kernel of bean-counters left in the home country to “manage” the “investment”. This is the main kind of “work” that occurs in the imperial core. It is why it is called neocolonialism, because formally it is not very different from the “management” by colonial powers over their colonies.
Spot on!
Spitballing here, but I think the primary contradiction in US political economy is finance capital opposed to itself.
Yes, I think you could frame it that way, but only if you bring in the connection to imperialism (as you do, of course, only a few sentences later).
Landlords say this fairly frequently, pretending this is an act of kindness when it reality means that the tenant pays of the bankloan and the landlord owns the property outright eventually having put nothing into it.
We had one of these clowns posting on Hexbear a few weeks ago.
Got a link? I gotta see this
Appreciated. Wow even with all the removed comments that guys a fuckin piece of shit
They eventually got banned for transphobia.
Based and deserved
If I were this satanically evil I wouldn't be putting my name and face on the internet for all to see.
If owning other people’s homes is too difficult, he could just not…
He could get a real job…
He wouldn’t hack it having to be and act like a real human being.
buckley-thorp
uh huh. i'm sure. anyway face the wall 
time to die
Supporting renter rights leads to renter wrongs?
3 renter rights is equivalent to a renter wrong
Bath and Leeds are some of the nicest places in the entire country. Bath is an old Roman town and half the city is probably a listed protected building. There is no housing competition for him there and I bet most of his properties are there.
Bath is probably the single most protected historical place in the entire country. The average house price is £600,000. A 2 bed flat will run you £380,000.
toronto suburbs got that beat on sheer ineptitude of planning
The result could be a sharp increase in advertised rents across the market, even if final agreed rents settle lower.
Hmm, sure seems like you 'advertising' lower prices was actually screwing people over anyway.
Fine 2 bedroom apartment for only $3 per month!*
* Actually, most places I don't even have to supply fine print, and can raise the rent as much as I want anytime I damned well please without even disclosing that fact.
Lol
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
119 points (100.0% liked)
news
24779 readers
521 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS