108

https://x.com/socialistadri/status/2051361245664555385

hasan-smashqin-shi-huangdi-fireball

HASAN CHATTER: “but people like Platner are the same people who killed almost 200 little girls in an Iranian school”

HASAN PIKER: “I don’t care”

https://x.com/GotownedU90175/status/2052201981947572355

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 55 points 1 week ago

Am I wrong that the yanks are so cooked that Hasan is still undeniably a good presence in their politics? The guy has gotten fairly close to normalizing the idea of "America deserved 9/11 for its imperialism," if not just getting it broadcast wide and loud.

I'm a cynic when it comes to American politics, and that informs my view of Hasan in terms of weighing up his good vs his bad. From where I'm standing, he's spreading the good tankie word, which is undeniably good. His bad is that his reformist politics will get yanks nowhere. I think it's a fair trade off.

t. guy who doesn't watch streamers, all of my hasan knowledge is osmosis

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago

i'm on the opposite end of the consumption spectrum here and you've pretty much got it bang on. i think his "reformist politics" are overstated. his role is raising consciousness and informing, not getting candidates elected. he's supported candidates who are exclusively opposed by and funded against by the democratic party. they're aren't socialist, but in his broader commentary and established political project, the point isn't to try and magically socialize the democratic party: the goal is to try and help elect people that want to end the genocide, and that they tend to be great mouthpieces for the failed neoliberalist democratic party is all the better.

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

It is also a very good thing if the people he boosts get crushed by the establishment (either before or after getting elected).

The idea that voting harder will resolve issues needs to be destroyed in the minds of american liberals (and this is partially underway). If there is a better way of propagandizing it than just outright demonstrating it, then I guess I wish someone would inform me about that. Explaining theory doesn't work at scale.

It is also important to keep in mind that Hasan is a figurehead propagandist for the US American Left. His audience is growing with the mainstream coverage, and these people are varely-deconstructed liberals. He would not have his platform (which is valuable to our movement) if he didnt channel his call to action toward things that are easily digestible. "Vote against Zionist/AIPAC candidates -> get involved with their campaigns -> organize outside of the electoral system (start a union, join DSA/PSL)" is a straightforward way to activate his large audience. Over the course of several years it will generate thousands of left-wing leaders who will be equipped (from their experience and education) for more advanced tactics.

It is a shame that this is the most prominent left figure available, but PSL are not yet up to the task. At the same time, Hasan's prominence could lead to that (or something that is equivalently effect).

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Am I wrong that the yanks are so cooked that Hasan is still undeniably a good presence in their politics?

I think the same way, and I expected the likes of Hasan not to lecture about Graham Plattner and Tucker Carlson. Fuck me I guess.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 52 points 1 week ago

At first when I read the tweet, I thought the OP was criticizing Hasan. The tweeter who posted this clip believes that there shouldn't be a third party in the US, also the tweeter is Canadian. That tweeter is a huge Hasan fan and many of the tweets are thirsting for Hasan. In the 10 minute video, Hasan says that he's not against a communist party forming in the United States. Then he says that his involvement with Democrat Party shit is because he thinks it will increase people's political awareness.

The second clip he says "Yeah i don't care man" in a dismissive tone, meaning that he doesn't care what the chatter thinks. The chatter presents a hypothetical that Platner would have killed 200 girls and Hasan dismisses the hypothetical. The clipper is trying to make it seem like Hasan supports killing girls but Hasan is saying that he doesn't care to entertain the hypothetical. Hasan obviously doesn't like that the US bombed an Iranian school, killing 160 girls. He says that all the time.

You can tell that the first tweeter is a fan because the clip is 10 minutes long. Haters aren't going to watch a 10 minute clip. You can tell that the second tweeter is a hater because they posted a 7 second clip. The 7 second clip is short so that you don't get any sense of context. It is meant to deceive the viewer.

Graham Platner is a war criminal. It's kind of funny how much Establishment Democrats are talking about Hasan. It doesn't really matter what Hasan thinks. He can't stop you from organizing into a new party.

You should organize a communist party.

[-] Blakey@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

He can't stop you from organizing into a new party.

He can't, like, physically prevent you, no, but if the people you would organise into that party are Hasan viewers, they won't join because he is literally here saying not to. Because he is a liberal.

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

he also tells people to join PSL, i don't think you have a good handle on what his average is. if you're only seeing his most entryist efforts, you're going to get the view being offered to people with little to no political consciousness.

[-] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

I know like 5ish Hasan fans IRL, and frankly they don't seem to have a cultist dedication to doing exactly what he says unlike a lot of other streamer fans. I doubt if they really wanted to join a new party, Hasan advising against it would deter them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GnastyGnuts@hexbear.net 40 points 1 week ago

Watching HasanAbi on Palestine: "This guy's pretty good, maybe I'll give this streamer shit a try!"

Watching HasanAbi on Graham Platner: kril-drained "... jesus fucking christ all those fucking nerds who told me to read Settlers were right god fucking damnit ..."

[-] Emmi@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 week ago

What is up with Hasan and his defence of Platner anyway?

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Somewhere here said lefty support for Platner reeks of desperation and that's my take too. The left broadly speaking doesn't have standards because we are so starved for candidates and people with genuine leftist convictions will tie themselves in knots trying to justify why they would vote for the serial liar with terrible political instincts and a sketchy as hell past just because he says the obviously correct thing about healthcare.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] microfiche@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago

Where are the posters who keep telling me he isn't a liberal?

Show yourselves cowards.

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago
[-] microfiche@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

at least you're consistent lol

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

i've watched the majority of his livestreams over the last few years because i wanted to get a sense of if he is a sincere operator and if he is more radical than what one might perceive based on any other form of being informed about his coverage. i would answer in the affirmative to both.

i think it's likely you disagree with the part of his work that is highlighted here, but i think it's fundamentally unserious to conclude he's a liberal from just that. you can disagree with people that are on your side.

[-] microfiche@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

This is not the only thing that makes me think he is a bougie liberal, comrade. It's just the most recent. It's a bit dismissive to call me unserious because this is my opinion so I'm just gonna disengage at this point.

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

i'll take your word for it, but i'd appreciate your thoughts then. i'm curious, i won't reply, i'm just really hopeful it isn't some version of "why hasn't he made the PSL nationally successful yet?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago

The phrase that (to me) gives the best explanation of entryism:

"Which is more likely? That one person will change the minds of an entire institution with hundreds of people, or will an institution change the class interests of one person?"

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

if that's the thing you think is happening here, i don't think you have a clear view of what you're looking at.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

After watching the UK Labour party go through this for the last 30 years (technically longer but not in my political activity) which is a far less robust and more easily coopted party than the dems I'm inclined towards the position that entryism in the dems is a totally futile endeavour bordering on harmful because if they get a small amount of success you will end up locked into a socdem vs conservative political battle for 30 years that eliminates any possibility of socialism until some stupid ass neoliberals find a way to purge the left as "antisemitic" and inadvertently causes a whole new left movement.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago

It's 2026 and Piker thinks the dems can be rehabilitated.

[-] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

I don't know if he thinks they can be rehabilitated. He's caught in the 2-4 year loop of thinking it's always too late to start a 3rd party because an election is coming up soon and things keep getting worse. So for 10+ years now he and USians have been not starting a 3rd party and them going "oh shit" every election. Extremely USian thing to happen. Whatever solution there is to this for them is going to either be after something horrific happens or some miracle where a trotskyist entryism cell takes over one of the parties.

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

can i offer the alternative perspective that there are a lot of 3rd parties and amerikkkan political and class consciousness is so low that none of them have ever been more than modestly and regionally successful?

trotskyist entryism cell takes over one of the parties.

that's essentially what's been happening to elect more socialist-sympathetic politicians. if your goal is to get the genocide and wars to stop as a step towards greater consciousness, i personally don't find it to be some wholehearted betrayal of ideological purity to try and get people elected who have made concrete vows to stop funding the war and genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just looking at this thread and wow. Who knew all the dnc needed was a dude with a nazi tattoo and multiple tours in the middle east (literally for the love of the game) talking about free healthcare to get the leftists on their side.

Lately, week after week of chapo has been just ‘you have to hand it to Tucker’, ‘you have to hand it Graham Plattner’, hey look I’m Felix and I describe myself as racist in a half-joking manner.

You can have your (((real))) working class and free healthcare, I’ll be here not voting for the democrats because they turned the racism dial up. So the criticism of libs only hinged on how embarrassing anti-bigotry is, even when it’s only lip service. Guess I am pretty lib after all shrug-outta-hecks.

And it’s always the self described Marxists, always adhering to some ridiculous orthodoxy to browbeat minorities. Man, from now on, if you don’t label yourself a Marxist-Leninist or Maoist, I don’t give a fuck about what you have to say about class consciousness or anti-imperialism because you’re probably some fucking tool.

[-] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 week ago

i'm hasan piker and we MUST vote for democrats it says so in this guy's book

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Your last paragraph is so true. It’s the perfect way to weed out NATO leftists because so many of them call themselves anarchists or Communists and then you find out they see MLM’s and Maoist’s as “red fash” or whatever stupid nickname they’ve coined now.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is correct to say it's futile to seek state or federal office as a leftist third party. It's simply not in the cards and electing a handful of commies to the house of representatives isn't going to do anything. I truly do believe it's a waste of time and resources.

Any leftist organization in the United States should only seek federal political office as propaganda or disruption, not to realistically gain votes. Local politics though are another game and it's very valid for leftists to run for city council, school board, that kind of thing. That stuff is actually important and within reach. I'd expect any leftist organization with sufficient infrastructure and membership to at least engage with local electoral politics. Like at least go to city council meetings or whatever your city might have. At least try things like that if you have the people and time available.

But also leftist orgs in the US are usually so thin and stretched that they already have their hands full just doing basic day to day admin type things. It's hard out there and there simply aren't a lot of us. There are way, way more of us than 15 years ago but leftism in the US is still more of an ambient subconscious anger than any sort of militant force to be wielded.

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly at this point if the permanent third partyists can't show their work and demonstrate a viable, convincing road map that could propel a vanguard working class party into the national mainstream of electoral politics; then yes get used to being dismissed by people who take the material and sociopolitical conditions of this dying empire seriously

To say nothing of the fact that the actual debate and crux of the struggle is over whether entryism into the Democratic Party will reform it or blow it up

I'm firmly in the camp that says the neoliberals of the DNC will never accept compromise and so will destroy the party at the first sign of a shift toward soc dem (let alone socialist) politics, thereby creating room and a seedbed for sucesssful national-scale third party politics

But to get there from here, requires engaging in electoral politics

[-] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

i mean

there is literally no point to trying to organize a third party in american politics? the whole electorial system is fucked, trying to make the genocide party "good" is just as reasonable as trying to make a third party that is "good" and has any chance of getting traction anywhere (which is to say, not particularly reasonable)

idk maybe i dont know enough about american politics but i had no idea people were advocating for a third party

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

The entire American political system is designed to be as divorced and decoupled from the actual opinions of the people that might participate in it as possible. It’s very unfair to expect good things to come out of it, and we among the left should know that best of all. We don’t even have a large enough body of representatives for the population, there’s a counter democratic institution called the Senate that’s there just to make it more oligarchical, it’s just a hallway of shit and mirrors.

Hope for the best as always but expect, please expect, the worst

[-] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

PSL has tried it but the fact that you, and many other people I've met, don't know about that is proof it's not working super well. It's a great recruitment tactic, it gives them an excuse to go out and talk to people and knock on doors and say their thoughts in debates, but I don't see them being successful anytime without some major changes in American politics.

[-] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

It probably doesn't help that if you know about PSL then you are more acutely aware of how the electoral system works and how much of an impossibly long-shot it is to create a third party in the United States.

[-] 666@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bingo. States can just shoot down these parties, cali has done so I believe or make ridiculous voter thresholds and fundraising/advertisement restrictions that can vary differently from county to county even, like New Jersey for example. People misunderstand how much people it takes to do the books for these kind of projects.

On top of all that, ANTIFA is considered extremist material, so any party that actually gains popular support can just get hit with terrorism charges. Reform has no hope.

[-] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

sorry should have clarified, i do know about psl i meant people on this site advocating for a third party

[-] T34_69@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Maybe the enthusiasm has died down a bit but there have been discussions on which party to join and that kind of thing. There have been some electoral successes on a local level like kshama sawant in Seattle and Green party representation on Oakland City council. This country is cursed though

[-] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A worker's party is pointless without a labor movement (unions) that support it. No party in the US has demonstrated any success at either attracting existing unions to them or cultivating new unions aligned with them.

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can have a labor movement without a union. In the U.S., any meaningful labor movement will be non-unionized. In the U.S. unions are used to hold onto the scraps you have, not to bargain for more.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

I'm growing more and more tired of hearing about this man every day.

[-] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 week ago

Just think about it platner wins and immediately confirms everyone's fears. Or just pulls a sinema

[-] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Isn't the person running against Platner also a massive piece of shit?

Kinda seems Maine is kinda fucked either way.

[-] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 14 points 1 week ago

Yeah it is either him, Susan Collins (who still things trump learned his lesson after the 1st impeachment), and before dropping out an ancient governor.

It's just disheartening to see how many are willing to over look the issues with platner to possibly get a chance at Healthcare.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

At this point I see Hasan’s entryism as partial naivety and partial survival tactics. He’s smart but he’s still just a (privileged) guy whose family is from Turkey. I don’t blame anyone for being slow to come around to the idea of a third party because I think we’ve only recently started living in a time where such a thing was possible. I don’t know if it’s a conscientious thing either but I think if he was openly building a third party this time he would have been assassinated years ago.

[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm kind of done listening to people tell me what Hasan said because they're always just making shit up.

That being said, anyone actually watch the 10 min clip and hear what he actually said? I mean literally someone tell me because I also cannot be bothered to listen to it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

I've seen hasan irl and he's not even that handsome

[-] Athena5898@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry but I've never liked Hasen but I don't like debate me bro culture. Its just parasocial all the way down. I also think it makes people think they are part of something that doesn't actually have any material gain.

Then you have the fact that if you try to criticize him in anyway. cause he's a human and does have shit takes in his years of debate me bro work. You are going to be dogpiled by said parasocial addicted people who are upset that you dared said anything bad about their poor streamer.

I honestly hate that liberals have made defending the dude a issue at all.

I really wish we wouldnt put single people on diamond made pedestals

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
108 points (95.8% liked)

Slop.

855 readers
395 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS