top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 145 points 2 years ago (47 children)

Why is sex work even illegal in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 54 child comments
  • [+] 89 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Seas he also the fella that said “Getting paid for sex is illegal… UNLESS YOU RECORD IT!”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    For years I've contemplated the idea if I came into a bunch of money if starting a porn studio where the customer is an actor/actress in the porn.

    We have a building and several "sets" with cameras recording, customer picks their "partner" and "set" and "shoot the porn", after they are done the video is burned on to a dvd(or blue ray or potentially put on a private file server).

    The customer isn't paying for sex, they are paying for the video.

    Pretty sure it would have a ton of legal push back and I would need a lot of money for the lawyers to fight the cases.

    But 1. Safer for everyone imvolved(it's video taped so you won't beat/hurt/kill the other party) 2.technically legal just like shooting porn

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    Because one of the biggest issues with sex work, human trafficking, gets worse with legalization. Studies across Europe have shown that countries that outlaw prostitution see a decrease in human trafficking victims while countries that legalized or decriminalized it see an increase.

    Unlike with drugs, you don't just create a way to increase the supply. A very small minority of women actually want to engage in sex work. And the few who do, usually envision the high class escort lifestyle. But working in a brothel charging $100 per client isn't something many want to do.

    But legalizing prostitution increases demand. Which makes it more profitable for criminals to utilize human trafficking to fill that demand.

    https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/lids/2014/06/12/does-legalized-prostitution-increase-human-trafficking/

    One source of it.

    It also doesn't help at all with protecting victims of human trafficking. Victims of human trafficking are already protected. But they don't step forward because of threats against their own well being and that of their families. Something that doesn't change just because their work technically is legal now.

    Which leaves a small percentage of people who fall into financial hardship and consider prostitution as a method of overcoming said hardship. For them that might slightly improve their situation. But that still means exploiting vulnerable people and isn't people engaging in sex work because they want to. And it's even questionable if people in these scenarios would follow the legal way.

    So while initially it might seem like legalizing it solves a lot of issues, it is more difficult than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I reckon that even though sex work is legalised, and still caused issues, the problem is that there is no government regulation. It's one thing to say by the government that they won't prosecute sex workers, but if it's not regulated and abuse still happens then nothing changed for all intents and purposes. Best analogy I could think of is like allowing food factories to manufacture food, of course. But if there is no regulatory watchdog to monitor and test to make sure food factories are not putting random and dangerous stuff into food, then legalising an activity is pointless.

    Basically, the sex industry having been legalised by many countries is unofficially a libertarian set up. Yeah, the government exists and allow sexual transactions between agreeing parties, but they're hands off on how the practitioners in the industry would conduct business. There is no government agency for sex workers to complain to if they're abused. I know people would ask, how exactly would the government regulate sex? That, I will leave to policy experts.

    Edit: wording

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • load more comments (40 replies)
    [–] 129 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm assuming they're arresting the sex workers and not the politicians and military officials?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    They'd probably have to confirm identities to arrest those folks, and also prove they aren't just getting name-dropped.

    Just grabbing the pimps and workers is a lot easier and less case intense

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 107 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 78 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Anybody remember that one piece about our servicemen being involved in trafficking women overseas about three years ago that was swept under the rug?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Ah, yes, 4-star generals in Procurement retiring to gold-plated consulting gigs in the very companies from which they ordered $1000 paper clips and congressional members using insider info from some congressional comission or other they're in for trading on their portfolios is all fine, it's paying for sex that's the real problem with holders of high level official positions in America.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The client list will likely go in the same vault as Epstein's. They're all assets now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    I'm sure they'll be arresting and charging the politicians any and revoking security clearances any moment now...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

    I really don’t understand the way the US works in regards to „bought“ sex… on the one hand prostitution is illegal (with the exception of Las Vegas parts of Nevada) and as soon as you point a camera on the paid fucking it is called PORN and it is still a multi billion dollar industry.

    You guys are weird

    Edit: changed the Las Vegas part

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's very bizarre. Kinda shocking the gov't hasn't figured out the massive amount of tax revenue behind the legalization of sex workers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    It started a few centuries ago when this annoying group of people known as Puritans were expelled from their home country and sailed to north America.

    The natives saved them from starvation and today still impose their beliefs and values on everybody. These hypocritical laws is but one example

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    In this day and age where nothing stays secret, how is it hard for elected officials not do stupid stuff like visiting brothels?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    In this day and age, why aren't brothels and sex work legal?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Where else are they going to get sex? From the woman they live with that is laughably called their wife?

    Look at Ted Cruz and tell me that there is a woman on the planet earth who will allow him inside her without money being exchanged.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    If the girls were sex trafficked I have a problem with this, if they were free to do as they please, then I have no issue with this.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Regardless of whether someone was trafficked, folks in positions of power chosing* to disregard the law is itself an issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago*

    Who would have thought it. A brothel in Watertown. Cambridge I can see. What's next, strip clubs in Belmont, Mitt Romney's home town?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›