you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The bribery potential of those officials violating the laws they're publicly supporting is the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They said the same thing to justify banning gays from working for the government or serving in the military.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because lies are a security risk. Which is a major part of why it's better to allow them into service openly. No secrets from the service, no leverage for betrayal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    The show For All Mankind did a good take on the problem IMO. Being gay wasn't illegal per se, but gay people could not be employed at NASA. They still joined, but they kept their orientation hidden. Then the security forces used the justification that gays keeping secrets were vulnerable to blackmail to go on witch hunts to seek and root out gays, and to defend the decision to ban gays from employment in the first place. It was a circular argument through-and-through. The base reason has always been prejudice. Didn't help that in the show there were real Soviet spies running around trying to find gays to extort for NASA rocket secrets.

  • source
  • parent