504
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Trump’s renewed criticism of the Chagos deal is reportedly because he is being blocked from using UK bases for a strike on Iran.

Donald Trump has withdrawn his backing for Sir Keir Starmer’s Chagos Islands deal because he has not received UK approval to use its military bases for a US strike on Iran, it has been reported.

The US president attacked the agreement to hand sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius and lease back the Diego Garcia joint UK-US military base as “a big mistake”.

His latest U-turn on his previous support for the deal is because of the UK Government’s refusal to give the White House the green light to use the Diego Garcia base or RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire for a potential military campaign against Iran, according to the Times.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 75 points 3 months ago

There’s no coalition this time. You’re on your own murca (well you’ve got your boyfriend Israel but they’re a bit tied up massacring children at the moment)

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 61 points 3 months ago

Unfair to Israel. They are also massacring women, the unarmed, the injured, the red cross etc etc. They are massacring or killing just about everybody. So please be fair to their efforts and not just limit them to children!!

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Their snipers activelly target children in Gaza and they activelly supported their boy Epstein with his sex ring using children.

There's clearly a very special relationship between Israel and children.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago

Not just shooting Children, they often aim for the groin.

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Looks like they recently killed a 19 year old American citizen too, but he was brown so they will get away with it

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

How do you know about this? Did they forget to kill a journalist somewhere?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

There’s no coalition this time.

The US is allied with a host of Middle Eastern dictatorships and monarchies

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I can't believe the EU commission took it seriously. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/02/20/eu-ministers-to-grill-commissionss-suica-over-attendance-at-trumps-board-of-peace-launch

It's sanewashing what's clearly an insane initiative.

[-] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Quite right. The Trump administration are the ones who decided they don't need allies. Fine, then there is no obligation for America's old allies to help America.

Maybe there should be an official alliance between America's old allies: Europe, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, etc. A big free trade area with Americans excluded.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

"America first! We don't need anyone!"

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 months ago

Trump:

Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime

Can someone please do that to us.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Death to Amerikkka

[-] Dragomus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, potential attack! It's like a repackaging of the WMD argument...
Not that I doubt Iran's crazed potential in the least, but currently the only potential attack comes from the US to cover up domestic sewage...
What will be the first target, "one way or another"-Greenland or Iran?

[-] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 27 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, Mr No-Wars warmongering again

[-] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 months ago

What could possibly go wrong? The short victorious "war" rallies citizens, especially those who the nationalistic (MAGA / NRA). It diverts from domestic issues like employment, the economy, ICE raids etc. It allows low scrutiny and speedy legislation changes. All at the low low cost of lives and future threats of retaliation.

[-] supamanc@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

And remember how we treated the Afghani's who helped the coalition during that war? Yeah, there will be absolutely no local support this time round.

[-] phaseshift@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

A petty note, but an important one… afghani is the currency not the people. They don’t like being called that.

Source: spent a year there with some friends

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's good to know, thanks!

Is there a demonym they (people who live in Afghanistan) tend to prefer...?

[-] Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Afghan is the demonym for nationals from Afghanistan

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

That makes perfect sense. Thanks! I think I was overthinking it hahaha.

[-] supamanc@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I didn't know that!

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

there will be absolutely no local support

You sure? Iran itself was eager to work with the US when Obama lifted sanctions. It's just business. People know and don't take it personal. After Syria, people in Iran know that they won't get democracy. And yet they are doing some revolting.

[-] supamanc@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah. The US and UK abandoned those natives who supported them on the ground in Afghanistan, left them to fend fo themselves after the Taliban took control. Seeing that, why would and Iranians put themselves in the firing line to support the US?

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025%E2%80%932026_Iranian_protests

Must be that they hope that it turns out well for them,

Initially sparked by frustration over record-high inflation, food prices, and currency depreciation

or sanctions work.

[-] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

There is a difference between a (somewhat) (maybe) spontaneous protest the the wider community is involved in, and treason. Supporting a foreign power in an invasion is going to get you and your entire extended friends and family group executed after a stay being tortured in a dungeon.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Addressing an estimated 250,000 people in Munich, Reza Pahlavi - who has called for the overthrow of Iran’s Islamic regime - denounced a crackdown on recent protests there

https://feddit.org/post/25854413

Some people want the Shah back.

[-] join@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

Plot twist of the year: Starmer found a spine?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Maybe. Or maybe he's suffering pressure from the rest of Europe.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Just cynical calculations, he doesn't have the support to declare war and it would be political suicide for him if he did. Israel owns him, he made his name in purging the party of people opposed to Israel's abuses, during Corbyn when they purged the party of him and all of his supporters mostly under bogus bigotry charges, accusing and removing more jewish people of anti jewish bias than others per capita.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 months ago

Well, well. The worm turns.

[-] 33550336@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Second praiseable move of the UK in the recent days

[-] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 months ago
[-] 33550336@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The arrest of former prince Andrew

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Didn't they let him go though?

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I had to look it up because I’m not super familiar or exactly following it, but yes he was. However, he is still under investigation.

I’m just assuming the arrest is what the other thing the commenter was hinting at.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

Released under investigation, they don't just arrest the king's brother on a whim, pretty sure they're pretty sure they can get a conviction.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

So are we ready to admit that Israel has our government occupied yet?

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

TFW the Brits are like, nah, we don't want to help you overthrow the shah of Iran.

[-] REDACTED@infosec.pub 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This whole thing can go haywire (including many civilian deaths), especially under Trump. It makes sense for UK to tell them to leave UK out of it. Besides, while going after Iran's regime is somewhat popular opinion - US doing it on the other hand suddenly makes it sound much more controversial.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm with you, on all counts. And I think not wanting to touch USA's shit is a legitimate take right about now. Shit, it was the wrong take to back in 2001/2003, and it was the wrong take back in *checks notes* most of US history, but right now for sure. We got our own problems now anyway, many of which were directly caused by the USA, so...

[-] Dragomus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Trump insulted all EU military fairly recently so that's probably a double nah from the former allies...
But hey he has his board of peace now, with all the ...oppressive... countries in it, perhaps they'll send highly trained soldiers to die in Iran.
Somehow I think not.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Well good they won't need to, it's been done since a while

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah I know it was just a geopolitical history joke. :)

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Maybe the Diego Garcia thing will be enough of an excuse to not go to war with Iran on Israel's behalf?

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

There is nothing that would prevent our lawmakers from doing what Israel tells it to, blackmail of them fucking children and whatever else, it finally explains a lot, and Israel isn't really hiding it anymore, they are reveling in taking the mask off.

As soon as they start the forever war, Israel will find endless excuses to go back in, bomb this, assassinate that. Weapons programs, terrorists, whatever excuses they come up with. This will never end, and that's the idea, Israel's governmental leaders want to forestall elections and a reckoning as they've decided that the politicians that failed should stay in power to deal with the fall out from that failure despite not admitting fault and blaming others.

The rest of their governmet, appointed by their politicians, supremely corrupt and unilateral for 25 years when the semblance of a left collapsed, either believes those politicians or pretends to because they think they will benefit. They revel in their absolute military advantage, able to bomb any of their neighbors with near impunity, as they are unable to well respond if at all, and backed by the US that they've compromised so thoroughly they are almost openly showing off being the ones calling the shots ordering the US around. The UK is owned by Israel too, make no mistake, they just have to kowtow to their citizens more in their anti war sentiment more, for now.

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
504 points (99.4% liked)

News

37746 readers
1788 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS