Just curious, but do you have statistics to back that up or are you just angry with Americans and making a statement?
As an American, I don’t even know what most people’s decision to not vote is beyond a multitude of reasons I have read about.
Just curious, but do you have statistics to back that up or are you just angry with Americans and making a statement?
As an American, I don’t even know what most people’s decision to not vote is beyond a multitude of reasons I have read about.
Sounds like you don’t understand the people of America. Yes, the people vote and we have an electorate that is supposed to vote on what people want.
However, a vast majority of Americans do not turn out to vote. Either they can’t because of logistics (e.g., gerrymandering, can’t get time off of work, etc), they abstain, or some other reason. We still, historically, have under half of the population actually turn out to vote. Voter turnout graph of the United States by share of population.
The thing that is baffling to me about this is why the Guthries? If this is as sophisticated as it seems, then why a well known journalist? There are hundreds or thousands more targets with way more money and/or clout from a social standpoint. This just seems like a weird target.
I saw someone say in another comment on a different article that she did some of the first investigating into Epstein stuff? Is this purely a political threat and warning to others?
Edit:
From the transcripts below the video:
Johnson said national databases could help narrow down a suspect.
Is this a hit job to test out databases and make it look like they’re a good idea to ease American minds into supporting them? Once again, this almost screams political.
Or am I just tinfoil hatting?
She’s (the relative) lucky she can do that. Some districts or schools have homework policies. As I am finishing up my master’s for elementary education, if I can get away with NOT assigning homework then that’s what I will do. They are kids and need their mental breaks as well. There’s research that shows homework doesn’t correlate to better learning or growth. It’s just busy work and play is really good for kids’ minds.
If anything, I will encourage them to read and tell me what cool thing(s) they are reading about the next morning!
Thank you! I’m a late career changer (in my early 40s), but I am loving it so far! I am student teaching in fifth grade currently and absolutely love it. I just want to do things that help others and I feel that teaching is one of those ways I can positively impact a kid’s life.
It probably helps that I’m also a dad, so I do have that empathy and an appreciation of kids and their humor as well.
I’m in my master’s program for elementary education. If I saw this, I would just pull them to the side and ask them to translate it to me as English. If it comes out sounding plausible, I’d give them full points because they knew how to say it. They could obviously already read it since they knew how to answer the question. So the writing could come later if that was an issue. I could even try and decode it with a translator first before asking for their translation just to see if they were bullshitting me.
If it was a joke, I’d let it slide but let them know that in the future I need them to write it fully in English.
I think his comment was really just him acknowledging UAPs and referring to them generically as “aliens”. That’s why he’s never “seen” them. He can’t confirm or deny little green men in these weird flying craft so his answer is he believes but he has not actually seen one.
Or he was just being cheeky for a fun clip. 🤷♂️
No idea why you’re downvoted. You’re right.
She’s not wrong. It’s just that her agents are causing the war part.
Between this, BG3 having non-binary options and same sex romances, bud light, etc doing things to let others feel noticed - Conservatives are gonna have nothing left to enjoy from boycotting.
I’m ok with this.
How do you afford quality cameras when your budget goes to militarization of the force?
I don’t understand this. Why are you targeting gay people? You wouldn’t put this up with replacing it with Black, Latino/Latina, Jewish, Muslim, etc.
Whether it points to positive or negative, why does it have to be a gay person? I guess I’m missing something about what this is meant to be for/do?