1326
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 129 points 2 weeks ago

When the US was having actual discussions of single-payer health care (i.e. the "public option" during Obama's first term), one major argument against it was "do you really want the government between you and your doctor?!"

Even though insurance companies are literally already between you and your doctor, and they exist purely to extract money from that interaction.

It's never made sense.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

The old arguments were "Look how long they (the socialists) wait to get appointments and get seen!" Yep, we're there now. I have insurance, I still pay a bunch, and seeing specialists is a luxury at this point. If I have an issue, I don't even consider calling specialists, because I know it's weeks til I can get in.

[-] quips@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

Weeks lol, try months to years round these parts

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

And then the same party decided to get the government in there too anyways

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

Ahaha that's a good point. Tbh despite the nickname "Obamacare" it had slipped my mind that the ACA was the bastardized, castrated version of that whole thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mghackerlady@leminal.space 9 points 2 weeks ago

I don't trust the government, but I trust them a hell of a lot more than insurance companies of all people

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Denjin@feddit.uk 105 points 2 weeks ago
[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You dead or without any money left, or both is the product.

... gatekeeping is what they get paid for.

[-] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 weeks ago

Look at finance! They don't make anything of actual value, they just bet what's going to happen to the people that do

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago

The US should adopt the Dutch healthcare system. You could have medical treatment as an average Joe and also not be bankrupt or up to your tits in debt.

[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 weeks ago

I mean if they picked a random country it probably has a good chance to be twice as good as the US system

[-] greasewizard@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

yeah, but, like the lines are long

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 weeks ago

Remember pryimid schemes are illegal. Because they dont sell a product.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

This is unironically Nixon's fault.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

It's also unironically Reagan's fault, as well as both Clinton and FDR.

Prior to FDR doctors and healthcare were run completely not for profit, and part of The New Deal included privatizing hospitals. Nixon did insurance. Reagan and Clinton mostly just took the government further out of healthcare by removing regulations.

[-] zarniwoop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Can you point me in a direction for a source of the new deal hospital privatization aspect please?

I’m unfamiliar and want to lean more.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Looking into it, it seems to have been Truman, not FDR, though FDR may have helped create the bill. You're looking for the healthcare reform act of 1945. I just remember my nurse grandmother going on multiple tirades about the privatization of healthcare starting around then, and healthcare in general being slowly suffocated by admins ever since. She didn't live long enough to give me her opinions on the ACA.

[-] zarniwoop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thanks. Yeah, I didn’t want to come off as a know it all umm actually guy so I figured I could be wrong and just ask for a source.

I had done my own search too but again, everyone is fallible so better to just ask.

Also I know it means nothing from some rando on the interwebs but good on ya for correcting yourself. In today’s age and all that…hope you’re as well as you can be. Take care! (Goes to look further into Truman’s war criminal ass lol)

Edit: it appears Truman actually tried to make a national health insurance act happen and was defeated by anti-communist sentiments, the American Medical Association, and republicans fear mongering and “they’re gonna raise your taxes!!!!” rhetoric. It would have been a part of the social security expansion but alas, congress is corrupt and Americans are gullible (being generous).

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 weeks ago

It’s wild how much this contrasts with Australia’s Medicare, like here you can literally just walk into the ER with any issue, show them your Medicare card and get your entire treatment covered for free unless you need any private healthcare, which even then there are rebates and private healthcare competes with public so it’s also moderately affordable.

There were 2 instances where my dad needed to be in hospital for multiple days at a time, once for a broken wrist after slipping at the boat ramp after a fishing trip, and the other was a stingray attack on his leg at that same boat ramp. Both instances didn’t require a single cent exchanged, we just walked in and described the issue, and boom, after a few days he was treated to the extent he could go home and not really worry at all anymore.

[-] C1pher@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Your dad should stay away from that boat ramp…

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zanathos@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago
[-] julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Please don‘t extrapolate from the US healthcare system to insurances in general. Insurances collect money from many so in the case something happens to an individual that individual doesn‘t need take the full financial loss. This makes a lot of sense, because it would very inefficient if everyone would save money in order to pay for a potential cancer treatment. Cancer is rare, but in aggregate it is just small amount each month.

The job of the insurance is to define that monthly amount (which is not trivial to do), collect it, store it and eventually pay it out.

On another note, unless an insurance is mandatory you can usually opt to pay yourself.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 25 points 2 weeks ago

That is the job of the government. Everyone needs healthcare to one degree or another. If we're all going to be pooling money anyway it shouldn't be filtered through a for-profit system first.

On another note, unless an insurance is mandatory you can usually opt to pay yourself.

No I can't. Everything is too expensive because insurance being involved has inflated the costs.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

The cost of insurance goes down the larger the pool of people. The largest pool in a country is everyone, so like utilities it becomes a natural monopoly.

Natural monopolies should be the purview of the government as they allow for abuse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stickly@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Anything critical to the life of an individual citizen, like health and home insurance, should be publicly run. It just doesn't make sense for a private company to manage that because their profit motive is in direct opposition to the individual (i.e. they must fight claims and inflate premiums to increase revenue).

The state loses money anyway if the person is homeless or destitute so they might as well pay out. Yes there are still agents to manage funds and adjust claims and set rates but they're now operating as impartial public servants instead of antagonists.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

You are too weak, cowardly and divided to stop it. That's why. Organize, grow a pair and empower each other. You must fight as a group or you will continue to be oppressed and exploited.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalism is basically about making as much money as possible with as few products/services as possible. Health insurance is one of the best ways to achieve that.

[-] architect 11 points 2 weeks ago

You forgot the most important part of capitalism which is exploiting labor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago

Here in Argentina that we have free healthcare, insurance is a signal of wealth so you get attended in the private hospital away from the common folk. And even in the private hospital everything is relatively cheap because they have to compete with the free option.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

You are the product. When your liability outpaces your premium is when they decide to stop covering you.

[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

waiting for a medical group to bypass them and collect premiums directly. if only to end insurance paperwork costs. it is a drag on everyone's bottom line. aside from price distortions.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] nroth@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I wish health insurance was just "you'll never pay more than 20k a year on medical bills" or something like that. Let me find my own damn doctor

[-] MarieMarion@literature.cafe 7 points 2 weeks ago

20k a year? That would be better that what you have now? Sincerly, a non-USAian

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 7 points 2 weeks ago

Pocket linin’ gatekeepin’

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
1326 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

10785 readers
3087 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS