80
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Shaleesh@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

Hello Hexbears!

I am acquaintances with a student who has a very likely lead on a software development position with a major military equipment manufacturer. He is VERY excited about this. Now, I don't know him too well but we are close enough to have a conversation and I would like to try to prevent him from going down this path. Especially considering he has other, less blood-soaked leads. His politics are unclear but from what I can gather he is vaguely progressive/berniecrat-ish, possibly sympathetic to the Palestinian cause but that's not 100% confirmed.

I have an idea of how I'm going to talk to him about this but I'm looking to see if anyone here has any experience regarding what is or is not effective in conversations like these.

Disorganized ramblingOk so I'm being vague about what company this is specifically for OPSEC reasons but from what I gather its pretty unambiguous that he would be contributing to the development of guided bombs, police surveillance, and networked weapons systems. Of course he has not actually said any of this. To him, the soon-to-be college grad its a high-paying job with some degree of prestige in a shitty labor market. The banality of evil in the imperial core I guess.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 70 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure the idea of "the stuff you do is going to directly mass murder innocent people" sells itself. 🤷‍♀️

[-] MoreAmphibians@hexbear.net 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"Actually my algorithms are good and will only mass murder guilty people"

[-] sictransitgloria@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

this is exactly what they say

[-] LargeAdultRedBook@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

"I only work on the infrastructure that facilitates all the murder. I don't do any murder myself."

[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

You're right! Say, I have a terrific investment opportunity for you... How to you feel about bridges?

[-] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 50 points 5 months ago

See if they agree with the phrase "it's difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it"

Then ask what will your salary depend on you not understanding?

What kind of person will your not understanding lead you to become?

Two wolves inside you and all that

[-] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago

This is a really good answer. Start with an abstract that doesn't put this individual person on the defensive for his particular choices, but that still gets him to question or at least think about the broader morality of people working for (and therefore aiding) something they would otherwise morally oppose. Then you can get more specific.

[-] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 40 points 5 months ago

Things you could try that should work on someone who's Bernie-levels of liberal, that is, they think they care about people.

"1. Have you thought through what your labor will do? How will you feel when something you work on blows up some civilian?

  1. If everybody refused to work for these ghouls, they wouldn't be able to murder civilians. Why would you help kill people?

  2. It's easy to get pigeon-holed into a career track based on work experience, so if you take this job it's likely you career advancement path will take you deeper into the MIC. Particularly given that you have other leads, why not pick a less unethical career path?

  3. Software is rough, but there's a need for software and firmware developers in better fields, such as biomedical engineering. Why not seek a job that saves people's lives instead of murders them?"

Idk, depends on how much he actually believes his ostensibly progressive ideals.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

yeah this discussion is how you find out if he's actually a monster who's not worth associating with

[-] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

These are all really good because 1) They are very poignant and 2) they are highly actionable given how much I am reticent to be "mean" to people. Thank you very much.

[-] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

o7 glad to help! I'd love if you can report back and let us know if any of pur suggestions helped or not.

It's really going to come down to whether he's goodhearted and just hasn't thought of these things, or if he's a selfish ghoul who wants to have his blood-soaked cake and eat it too. You're not so much able to change his mind as give him an opportunity to do so himself, but his response will tell you if he's worth associating with or not.

Also, I salute you for trying yo convince fellow students not to go into to MIC!

[-] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

Thank you, if it works it works, if it doesn't it doesn't, I don't have any great attatchment to him, like I said hes more of an aquaintance. I'll try to provide an update some time once I actually find the chance to actually sit down and talk to the guy.

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago

How mean are you allowed to be? I haven't gone to many punk shows lately and youre about to hear kinda why, i say a pal who i wanted to catch up with and this dude who plays in 3 punk bands and is apparently an anarchist was talking about how he was taking computer stuff at community college and said his teacher had worked for both the cia and nsa. I replied 'so he's pure evil.' Not really expecting blowback, and got a what do you mean. If punks dont accept the nsa and cia as ontologically evil, fuck em

[-] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

I'm curious how the rest of the conversation went after the "what do you mean?" question. Was it just a matter of ignorance (which is shocking enough itself for a supposed "anarchist") or did he actually try to argue that those who work for CIA/NSA aren't evil?

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wasnt time for a follow up. He should know better.

[-] Wolfman86@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

For me punk means anarchist, but I suppose that doesn't automatically mean left.

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago

Tell him that the camp guards at Auschwitz got really good benefits

[-] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

I bet some of them got amazing retirement packages when they were let go.

[-] Chana@hexbear.net 21 points 5 months ago

Find specific examples of what the company does and how it relates to murder of the global south, then present this information to them. Imagine you're writing a pamphlet to hand out. Or actually write that pamphlet and do hand it out, including to this person you know. Antiimperialist student groups use this tactoc, targeting job fairs and specific companies and it does help dissuade people.

For example, Boeing is the exclusive manufacturer of the JDAMs destroying Gaza.

[-] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

That actually fucks really hard. Gonna try to integrate this.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 20 points 5 months ago

get his phone and email the communist manifesto to the recruiter or their HR department

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 18 points 5 months ago

when you actively pursue a career that requires you aggressively not give a shit about human life in general in pursuit of opportunism, your co-workers, bosses, and professional contacts are all going to be self-selecting scumbags.

if that doesn't matter to them, tell them they'll fit right in. and then uppercut them with a roll of quarters.

[-] darkcalling@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Without knowing more about this person and your relationship to them I guess my very cautious way to approach it would be to mention in a vague kind of way how -some people- might find working for an arms-maker a troubling thing to do and given the controversy around such things they should perhaps give thought to whether they feel it's a good fit they'd feel comfortable with and good about. That it's nice to have a well-paying job but would it be something that would cause them any kind of stress or moral dilemma that would make the job harder or would it be something they truly are comfortable with.

I do think mentioning the pigeon-holing cuddlefish mentioned would be good too. How unfortunately once you get experience in a specific sector like this you tend to be guided into jobs like that in future and is that the kind of career track they're hoping for or were they hoping for something else in another industry and if so wouldn't it be better to take something that leads more clearly into that rather than this?

[-] THEPH0NECOMPANY@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Mmmm ok I am in college in STEM fields and this has come up pretty often with my classmates. I'm pretty happy that most of them have been very uncomfortable working for the MIC, not a single one of them has been excited at all about these kind of job opportunities, even the more conservative ones are grossed out. We would be making the physical equipment though not the software so that might make a difference in how they perceive it.

Everyone has seen what our weapons do and if this person still wants to go contribute to that then idk what you can say to them that's going to change their mind.

I would probably just bring up the morality of working at such a company and go from there. If they actually listen you might be able to have a bigger conversation but if they deflect (well someone is going to do the job ect ect) then they don't care.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago

If all else fails you can try a Hail Mary with, "The money won't last and the blood never washes off."

[-] PapaEmeritusIII@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago

Shame is a powerful tool. If you come on too strong then he’ll get defensive, but a bit of tactfully restrained disgust can work wonders.

If you would want to distance yourself from someone who works on weapons, then don’t be afraid to make it clear to him that you feel that’s way. Nobody wants to be the guy who drives people away

[-] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago

Depending on the specifics, it's likely that all of his coworkers will be insufferable jingoistic hogs, it will be completely miserable to work there

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago

Whatever I do doesn't work. I'm just a crank for criticizing anyone's job, no matter what that job is. And if they're in the MIC, they'll find a way to pretend that it's just for "defense." But I will certainly be following this thread to see if I can pick up better tactics myself.

[-] Euergetes@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

scold and shame, scold and shame

[-] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

I am working on becoming less of a weenie so I don't think this is a viable option, but maybe one day I could use this.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

This is tough. There's a lot of very well paid jobs in the MIC, and they have you working on a lot of technologically exciting stuff. It's sadly very common for bright people, with nominally good politics, to work for some very dark entities. If you aren't locked in to some very clear principles, it can be very tempting to rationalize it. You probably can't stop this kid, but you should just ask honest questions, like: "Don't you think you'll feel bad developing tools that are going to be used 99% for bad shit?"

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23229 readers
257 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS