Why are court drawings? Is there some sort of a liberal theater that prevents just filming the whole thing?
bottles of piss

Artificial Intelligence vs Actual Indians.
The phrase also extends to liberals being against the earlier stages of an atrocity but being fine with the current stuff. See what they think about the ongoing invasion and subjugation of Iraq.
Cool. I guess every socialist project should just ally with the US and fight all of the other socialist projects. Down with international solidarity, up with helping the Imperial Core keep its hegemony! /s
Now the PRC remains with much diminished allies, having assisted in the ruination of Afghanistan, driving Vietnam away, and with NATO still being the dominant force in the world.
I still don't understand how anybody can defend the foreign policy of the PRC at the time.
My 'hot' take is that your unsubstantiated assertion is contradicted by Putin's history. He was on the anti-communist side in the 90s, he has been against any sort of return to a planned economy throughout his terms, he has been in favour of stuff like monetisation of welfare, etc.
It's extremely silly to assert that he wants to 'bring back his glorious USSR' when his actions directly contradict that.
wants to bring back his glorious USSR
HAHAHAHA.
Meanwhile Dump literally talks about killing people in the street
Meanwhile, Harris has been doing that throughout her career and also promises to do more of that.
Turns out, dragons are kind of cool.
Can we allow uncontrolled numbers from coming into the us? No
Why not?
Tomorrow_Farewell
0 post score0 comment score
suspended an account I set up specifically for asking questions after I edited a relevant post.
You, singular, for example. We can read the modlogs, you know.
You very obviously support a state that has invaded at the very least Iraq, Syria, and Mali. That state being the Ukrainian state, one of the de facto subjects of the most prolific invader in the world. You even call things "Russian propaganda" with the implication that it is false when it contradicts what the invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan tell you to believe about their designated enemies.
On that note, I do want to ask, what do you think a state should do when the most prolific invader in the world tries to amass weapons and military personnel on its borders, especially after attempting and/or completing coups d'etat against neighbouring states?