[–] 8 points 20 hours ago* (2 children)

I asked my upstairs neighbor what he was listening to because I fucked with it and now he keeps apologizing and telling me he'll keep it down...

No, I want him to do the exact opposite of that but he won't hear me out... I fucked up.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Oh you'll get to that point eventually, its never going to be as good as sitting down in front of a more comfortable setup but with time bathroom sinks (or car mirrors or compacts or remarkably still pools of water or what have you) will become viable as well. Writing this gave me a (good) flashback to a time in highschool when I watched (in awe) as one of my gal pals put on her eyeliner with her cellphone camera during a second period study hall. Chicks rock.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    "Mystery flavor" dum-dums are actually industrial waste.

    There is only one dum-dum production line (located in Bryan, Ohio) and only one flavor can be made at a time. Cleaning the whole thing out takes a long time and would be prohibitively expensive to do so between flavors. Therefore, the solution is to use the next flavor to flush out what is left of the previous flavor. This process leads to an interim mixing of flavors, and those are labeled as "mystery flavor". The order in which the flavors are made is determined by what would taste decent AND it is kept a secret from the general public, as to preserve the mysterious nature of the mystery flavor.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I have no idea how to word the title in a way that both encapsulates what Im talking about and doesn't sound like something a tik tok-ass crystals person would say.

    I started HRT in two phases, first came spiro and some months later came estrogen. The reasoning behind the multistage approach was ultimately very silly and totally irrelevant to this topic. However the experience of starting an antiandrogen and estrogen source seperately was very interesting.

    Spiro was like waking up for the first time in over a decade. Estrogen had a myriad of more subtle cognitive, almost spiritual effects. I could feel the existence of an authentic self at my core in a way I hadn't been able to before. I described the feeling as "getting my body and my life back from someone who couldn't handle it anymore". This was well-prior to coming out and girlmoding fulltime.

    Over time, many (but not all!) of the memories from before this began to feel like they belonged to someone else. Some felt like the recollection of stories I had been told, rather than events I had lived through. Some had a perspective shift, I was no longer the participant, but an observer, someone standing in the corner of the room or in the "backseat" of my own mind.

    I've heard of a handful of similar experiences from other, equally transgender ladies but nothing quite like this. Some of my friends have suggested that what I'm describing are symptoms of an altogether more serious personality/disassociative disorder... but I dunno about that (my therapist had doubts too) and thats really scary anyways.

    So like, can anyone else relate or am I just really really unwell?

     

    Pic unrelated

    I love waffles :3 easily my favorite breakfast food. Developing different recipes has been so much fun! Lately I've been having one with lots of ground flaxseed and it has been keeping me quite regular. I'll have one or two of those in the morning with some tofu breakfast/lunch "meat" and a bit of cheapo syrup. There also was a version with pea protein powder that worked out pretty well but I neglected to write down the recipe, oops.


    Vegan waffle recipe

    Makes 4-5 "standard" belgian waffles, actual amount will vary based on what kind of waffle iron you use.

    Equipment

    2 bowls, preferably with pouring spouts

    Whisk

    Measuring cups and spoons

    Waffle Iron

    Optional: Using a rubber spatula/scraper will help when pouring the batter into the waffle iron.

    Dry mix:

    1 cup white flour

    2-3 tablespoons ground flaxseed

    1 teaspoon salt

    1 teaspoon baking powder

    Optional: 1-2 teaspoon powdered cinnamon or blend of "sweet" spices.

    Wet ingredients:

    1 cup plant milk (see notes)

    1 tablespoon neutral tasting cooking oil

    Optional: 1/2 tablespoon breakfast syrup or granulated sugar will add some flavor and improve the texture of the crust.

    Instructions:

    1. Mix dry ingredients in a bowl until combined, set aside

    2. In a seperate bowl, preferably one with a pouring spout, whisk the wet ingredients together vigorously, if using granulated sugar whisk until it is dissolved.

    3. Add the dry ingredients to the wet ingredient bowl and mix until combined but still slightly lumpy. Allow the batter to sit for at least five minutes so the flaxseed can hydrate.

    4. Make the waffles, portions and waffle iron operation will vary. Consult the manual or wing it carefully.

    Notes:

    • This recipe may take longer to cook fully compared to other mixes. Ultimately the steam produced by the cooking process is always an accurate indicator of doneness.

    • The dry mix can be made well ahead of time, a double batch fits nicely into a 32 oz deli container.

    • Adjusting the amount of plant milk will make the waffles more or less dense, experiment and adjust to preferences. 2/3 cup dry mix to 1/2 cup wet mix (or 1 cup to 3/4 cup) is my preferred ratio.

    • The batter keeps well overnight if refrigerated in an airtight container but you will need to add a little more liquid and stir thoroughly because it will be very thick.

    • The batter dries like cement, wash the bowl immediately after using.


    ___ Join our public Matrix server! https://rentry.co/tracha#tracha-rooms ___

    As a reminder, please do not discuss current struggle sessions in the mega. We want this to be a little oasis for all of us and the best way to do that is not to feed into existing conflict on the site. Also, be sure to properly give content warnings and put sensitive subjects behind proper spoiler tags. It's for the mental health of not just your comrades, but yourself as well.

    Here is a screenshot of where to find the spoiler button.

    spoiler

     

    Synchronicities are fun.

    I moved recently and as I was unpacking (and dusting, and delabeling, and undeadnaming) my music collection I came to notice that two of my CDs (Sarah McLachlan - Solace and Indigo Girls - Indigo Girls) had the same name written on them in the same handwriting. The name is pretty uncommon, and the same as the last name of a guy I had met a couple months ago. It was a long shot but I texted them a picture of the two cd's next to eachother and asked "Do you have any relatives who are/were into artists like Sarah McLachlan and the Indigo Girls?"

    To which they replied "Yes, my mom. That's her handwriting."

    We later got confirmation from their mom that these actually were hers before her ex husband threw her entire collection away over a decade ago. I have offered to return them to her but have yet to receive a response. Kinda hope she lets me give them back to her, I like the way that it would bring things full circle.

    What really gets me about all this is that I picked up the copy of Indigo Girls a little over seven years ago and the copy of Solace this year, in a location about 200 miles away.

    I just thought that was neat and felt like sharing.

    Ice Cream Cones (hexbear.net)
     

    Can you believe that before they invented ice cream cones youd walk up to the stand, place your order, and the guy would have a scoop of your shit and be like "yo wheres the bowl" and if you didnt have a bowl youd be like "I dont have a bowl" and the dude would get pissed, like PISSED and shoot you in the face and youd die. and youd really die because its was the 1800s and they hadnt invented doctors yet.

    Wow.

    Ice cream cones.

     

    I was clickity clack clack clacking away on my Olivetti 32 writing greetings to new neighbors this afternoon and I remembered how satisfying, how fun this is. I also totally forgot how the workflow went, but figuring that out again was enjoyable. My handwriting is kinda shit and a computer printout lacks soul so I find the typewriter is a happy medium for personal correspondence. I aught to do this more. My personal machine is from '63 and I'm thinking she needs some work done to the platen because its hard as a rock and the paper keeps sliding around in imperceptibly small amounts that add up over time. Thinking of doing the "bike tire shrink wrap" trick but that makes me nervous. Removing the platen on a machine like mine is a very involved process as well, rather intimidating.

    Anyone else enjoy working with typewriters?

     

    I went back to work on my writeup, I will return to finish this tomorrow.

    Work in progress, cws for hitler, nazis, the holocaust, and a couple dick jokes"A sensationalistic thriller about Hitler." - The New York KKKrimes

    Books are a terrible medium for "so bad its good" media. The Room, one of the most notorious "so bad its good" movies only takes an hour an a half to get through and will reach its conclusion unaided by the observer. Conversely, something like Sonic's Ultimate Harem can only be completed through 100's of manhours spent in rapt attention, analyzing the material in question. Moreover a shitty wordsmith can fail their reader through errors and confusing lexical choices. Worst of all, bad writing is usually boring.

    Siegfried, with its short length, competent writing, and novel but absurd premise, does not have these problems. I describe it as a self-insert Hitler fan fic that boldly asks "what if Hitler had a secret son and his foster parents told the best author ever (who is totally not me)".

    Harry Mulisch was one of the most celebrated European authors of the 20th century. The son of a Jewish mother, Nazi collaborator father, and the grandchild of holocaust victims, he has been quoted with saying: "I didn't so much experience the Second World War. I am the Second World War." He has a few dozen awards to his name and was almost granted the Nobel prize for literature a couple times (allegedly). In the anglosphere he is best known for The Assault; a novel about a boy who's family was massacred during the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands, and how his life played out afterwards. It is (was?) frequently used as instructional material in advanced level highschool literature courses. Its a beautiful novel about the lasting impacts of violence, Europe, and how pickles are just like crocodiles.

    Siegfried in a nutshell:

    Hey guys, my name is Rudolph Herter, I'm the bestest, coolest, most awesomest author of all time! My life is amazing! I just wrote the most important novel to ever be written, I have a hot, sexy wife, and everyone loves me! BTW I'm totally not Harry Mulisch haha :) Anyways I got a huuuuuuuge problem on my hands! Remember how I said that I just wrote the most important book ever? Well now I have to top that with something even better!!!! You see, big dick authors such as myself are suuuper important because only we can make sense of this craaaaaaazy world for the rest of you guys! I went on this talk show and told everyone that my next book was gonna figure out just how Hitler was so evil! Which no one has ever done! Ever! No one! Then everyone clapped! Then after the show these two old people came up to me and were all like "eyo we raised Hitlers son." and I was like "WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA????" and then cough cough

    Okay, using that (writing) voice was starting to hurt so I'm gonna do this normal now.

    The self-portrayal of Mulisch is self-aggrandizing to the point of it being masturbatory and it is incredibly funny at times. Not-Harry Mulisch is giving talks on an award tour where he announces that his next book would be an attempt to comprehend the evil of Adolph Hitler. Immediately after the show he is approached by an elderly couple who confess to being the foster parents of Hitler's secret son, Siegfried. The rest of the story has chapters that swap between this alternate history of Hitler's family life and Not Harry Mulisch reflecting on his life, art, and career. Without spoiling too much, the Hitler fanfic portion is actually fairly compelling. Siegfried calls his father "Uncle Adi", because the secret must be kept from him too, despite how much Hitler wishes he could be his dad. I feel that this is a reflection on the way fascism drains its practicioners of their own humanity, leaving them alienated, depriving them of what could have been normal lives.


    Join our public Matrix server!

    https://rentry.co/tracha#tracha-rooms


    As a reminder, please do not discuss current struggle sessions in the mega. We want this to be a little oasis for all of us and the best way to do that is not to feed into existing conflict on the site.

    Also, be sure to properly give content warnings and put sensitive subjects behind proper spoiler tags. It's for the mental health of not just your comrades, but yourself as well.

    Here is a screenshot of where to find the spoiler button.

    spoiler

     

    This was at some department store. The doors had keypads on them so I went back to the entrance to ask this kid if I could be let in. The dude gives me a smug little smirk and radios for someone to meet me back there. No one showed up after like seven minutes and as I left the aformentioned mall operator was going through some poor ladys cart item by item. I was later able to find an unsecured restroom a block away.

    Even the strip malls have gone mask-off, this shit sucks.

     

    I've had a lot of conversations with cis people about the trans experience and most of these have been cordial, if not enjoyable! While most of the points raised when discussing the struggle for trans liberation elicit sympathy from these people the topic of minors transitioning tends to get the strongest and most oppositional responses. They seem to believe that the possibility that someone may regret transitioning for identity or reproductive reasons justifies blanket bans on transitioning for minors. I've also heard concerns about gender affirming care being used as an avenue for medical abuse, of which I am unaware of any verified cases.

    How does one approach the topic of trans liberation for trans minors? Obvously debatelord antics aren't going to win hearts and minds but there has got to be some narrative angle that resonates with cis people or otherwise dispells their fears of cis children coming to harm.

     

    Transgender Law Center Condemns SCOTUS Opinion in Hecox and BPJ

    NATIONAL – Transgender Law Center decries today’s ruling by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v BPJ and Little v Hecox, which greenlights discrimination against transgender youth who want to participate on sports teams that match their gender identity. The majority opinion, fully supported by all six conservative justices, allows the sports bans in Idaho and West Virginia to stand.

    “Today’s sweeping ruling is a huge overstep of this court’s power to push ideology over honoring basic civil rights,” said Shelby Chestnut (they/he), Executive Director. “We know a future is possible where every person, no matter who they are, has the freedom to live and thrive as their authentic selves. Our people are organizing in every community to make our voices heard, hold our leaders accountable, and build a world that works for all of us.”

    All nine Justices upheld the sports bans on the basis of Title IX. The majority opinion also ruled that these bans are not a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. In the dissenting opinion, Justice Sotomayor noted, “In the end, to the Court, the facts do not matter, even though the consequences are serious.”

    “It is egregious that the Supreme Court authored this opinion, upholding these clearly discriminatory bans,” said Shawn Thomas Meerkamper (they/them), Managing Attorney. “Every young person deserves to move through life free from discrimination or exclusion. We are steadfast in pursuing every legal avenue possible to ensure all youth, including transgender youth, can belong.”

    While the long-term impact of the Court’s ruling is not yet known, this will likely affect civil rights protections for transgender people in many other areas.

    “We have always known that the courts have never been a validator to our worth or our existence,” said Mariah Moore (she/her), Director of Policy & Programs. “Time and again, our civil rights have been fought for and won when we show up together and make our demands crystal clear. No matter who is in power, we will continue banding together to create a future where every person can live freely as themselves.”

    Transgender Law Center filed an amicus brief in the case to uplift the lived experience of transgender athletes and the importance of sports in their lives. Read their stories here.

    Today, the Supreme Court also issued its decision in Trump v Barbara. In a 6-3 decision, the Court struck down the administration’s Executive Order targeting birthright citizenship, holding that the order violates the 14th Amendment.

    “All of us, no matter where we come from, deserve safety and belonging in the place we call home,” said Isa Noyola (she/her), Director of the Border Butterflies Project. “The ruling today reaffirms that everyone born in this country deserves recognition, rights, and the freedom to participate in our society. We all belong here, and we will never stop showing up to create a world where current and future generations can thrive.”

    Text

    On June 30—the last day of the term and the final day of Pride Month—the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling that states may ban transgender athletes from women's and girls' sports, holding that Title IX permits schools to determine eligibility based on “biological sex.” The ruling, authored by Justice Kavanaugh, was narrower than some of the worst-case scenarios: it preserved Bostock, did not overtly strip transgender people of equal protection, and explicitly declined to decide whether states must exclude trans athletes. But its most consequential holding still has vast consequences. The Court declared that "sex" in Title IX "cannot plausibly be interpreted to refer to anything other than biological sex"—a definitional ruling about the statute itself, not merely about sports. And though the majority deliberately avoided saying that blue states must discriminate against transgender people under Title IX, its holding leaves wide lanes for the Trump administration to pressure schools and colleges through funding threats and investigations, and for far-right organizations like the Alliance Defending Freedom to file lawsuits targeting trans-inclusive policies in every state in the country.

    The decision split along ideological lines, with all six conservative justices in the majority and the three liberal justices dissenting on equal protection. The majority declared directly, "The term 'sex' in Title IX, the Javits Amendment, and the Title IX regulations cannot plausibly be interpreted to refer to anything other than biological sex." This ruling overturns years of lower court precedent. The Fourth Circuit, in Grimm v. Gloucester County, had held that Title IX's prohibition on sex discrimination protects transgender students' right to use bathrooms and play sports matching their gender identity. The Seventh Circuit, in Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District, reached the same conclusion. Those rulings—and the logic underlying them—were foundational to school policies across the country protecting transgender students in both red and blue states.

    The ruling was not as sweeping as it could have been. The Court specified two important limiting principles. First, the majority explicitly stated that it was not deciding whether states that choose to allow transgender athletes to participate are in violation of Title IX—noting that "that question is currently the subject of litigation in some lower courts" and that "nothing in this opinion is intended to decide that question." This preserves, at least for now, the legal space for inclusive states to maintain their own policies. Second, the Court declined to resolve whether transgender people as a class are entitled to heightened constitutional protection under the Equal Protection Clause. This was one of the potential worst-case scenarios—a ruling on those grounds could have greenlit virtually any law targeting transgender people by declaring them undeserving of equal protection. Instead, the Court analyzed the sports bans as sex-based classifications subject to intermediate scrutiny, and found they satisfied that standard.

    Ultimately, though, the impact of this ruling will likely be severe. The most immediate consequence is that states across the country now have clear Supreme Court authorization to enact education-based bathroom and sports bans targeting transgender students, with Title IX posing no barrier. But the damage will not be confined to red states. The Court gave a wide lane for lawsuits against schools and colleges in blue states that allow transgender athletes to participate. Though the majority deliberately avoided ruling on whether inclusive states are violating Title IX, it heavily endorsed the theory that even a single transgender athlete on a girls' team "displaces" cisgender athletes—devoting an entire passage to the zero-sum nature of sports, writing that "every athlete who makes a team takes a roster spot from another athlete" and "every competitor who wins a race or competition deprives another athlete of that victory, or medal, or prize." That displacement framework is the foundational legal theory behind ADF's lawsuits in Minnesota and other states, and it is central to the Trump administration's Title IX enforcement campaign against schools that include trans athletes. The Court did not adopt ADF's argument that Title IX requires exclusion. But it endorsed the factual premise on which that argument rests—and in litigation, the premise is often all you need.

    A more likely and immediate impact of this ruling, though, is the ratcheting up of the Trump administration's pressure campaign against colleges, universities, and public school districts to capitulate to its anti-trans demands. Prior to the ruling, the administration conducted rushed Title IX investigations, finding school districts and universities across the country in violation of Title IX unless they voluntarily enacted bathroom bans, sports bans, dormitory restrictions, and more. Most of these institutions pointed to circuit court Title IX precedent requiring them not to discriminate as their shield against capitulation—telling the administration, in effect, that federal law compelled them to include trans students, not exclude them. That shield is now gone. And while institutions could still point to the Equal Protection Clause, the Court limited that avenue as well: the majority held that sex-based classifications satisfying even a general relationship to the state's interests are constitutional, eliminated the ability of individual plaintiffs to bring as-applied challenges showing a classification doesn't fit them, and declared that even if the factual premise underlying a ban is wrong—even if trans athletes on puberty blockers have no physical advantage—the ban survives anyway.

    “This ruling is deeply harmful for transgender women and girls who only asked for the ability to participate in sports with their peers,” said Sasha Buchert, Senior Attorney and Director of the Non-Binary and Transgender Rights Project, Lambda Legal. “Countless studies have demonstrated the myriad benefits that come with participation in team sports. Now, one population, transgender youth and collegians, are targeted for specific and baseless discrimination. We will not be deterred and will continue to fight back to secure the equal participation that all youth, including transgender youth, deserve.”

    Both of the above links are worth the read but the tl;dr is:

    • Discrimination against trans student athletes is ok, school bathroom bans may be as well.
    • Ruling is narrow and does not remove other protections for trans people, but may open up other avenues for attacks.

    If I'm understanding this correctly, this is basically saying that sex-segregation policies in schools do not violate the rights of trans students.

    view more: next ›