Its really easy to be banned from hexbear, all you have to do is be a misogynist or a transphobe or a racist and so on and so forth. That's not really worth bragging about but to each their own.

I think they mean it's impressive that they got banned here despite their post being on another instance.

Boss babyism. "Even this other thing I've heard is bad/"insane" is incompatible with your badness/insanity. You are very far from the ideal baseline of calm, aloof rationality, i.e. me and the other people with whom I share a common ideology."

It's a comm on that instance to discuss "abuse of power" by mods/admins, in this case the "Hexbears higher ups"

Not just roasting them but roasting them for getting banned from here lmao.

keep shooting for buddy... one day you'll succeed.

Brb posting about hexbears mods victim blaming smh my head

If this is some kind of meta-ironic bit (qrstuv posts a lot of ironic responses all across that instance), qrstuv you should read Sartre and actually understand the origins of your absurdist sense of humor buddy. You can't even do irony right.

That's my theory atp

Yeah I started to catch on that it was all ironic too, but it seems very strange to me to be doing this meta-ironic bit in a news comm???

Anyway, because you're more familiar with this user's content, I'm just gonna take the opportunity to blast you with a tangential question about irony and fascism. In Roderic Day's often-cited-on-Hexbear-(particularly-by-myself) essay Really Existing Fascism, he writes:

Marx, Nietzsche, and the Conscious Pursuit

In our story so far, Nietzsche and the question of symmetries and anti-symmetries between Nietzsche and Marx have sat unattended in the background. Now is the time to bring them to the fore and to explain why I consider them so useful.

Consider how Nietzsche talked about masks:

Every profound spirit needs a mask. Even more, around every profound spirit a mask is continually growing. [53]

Contrast this with the way Marx and Engels publicized their commitments, and encouraged others to do so, in The Communist Manifesto:

The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. [54] ... In other words, when his antisemitic interlocutors advised Nietzsche to mask racism in his writing, they inadvertently spurred him to find justifications for slavery and elitism that weren’t rooted in the all-too-modern and universalist (and thus unstable, empirically refutable) arguments of “race science.” After all, “race science” is, both historically and logically, a liberal concept. If racial differences turn out not to be inherent, there goes the whole (liberal) argument for white supremacy. Liberal racism still feels the need to justify itself in scientific, i.e. universalist terms. As Nietzsche correctly observed, this is already a capitulation to socialism, which wins more the more people scientifically reason together. To truly condemn socialism, Nietzsche painted the issue of class domination as one of will, aesthetics, “freedom,” and spirit.

Fascists often use irony, wordplay, euphemisms, and dogwhistles to play with truth (Sartre "Never believe the antisemites..." maybe summarizes this sentiment better). Isn't it strange to use the same duplicitous language of irony to try and say something leftist? Ever since reading that essay, I've kind of understood that leftists should strive to, as Marx said, never conceal their views and aims and openly declare exactly how and why those aims should be implemented. The fact that our views and aims aren't shameful is our greatest asset. So I've learned to be very suspicious of people that are so ironic.