964
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 278 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

American government: Builds concentration camps

Mexican government: Develops brand new chocolate bars

I'm happy to see there are still some governments out there who rule in the interest of the people.

[-] [email protected] 66 points 1 week ago

A high quality chocolate bar, at that.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[-] [email protected] 103 points 1 week ago

Not objecting, but what is the motivation of the Mexican government to do this? Have they done similar things before?

[-] [email protected] 108 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think they've done something exactly like this, but they have aggressively tackled obesity in recent years, going as far as labeling all foods with excess fats, salt, and sugar. It's very visible on the package and it does influence what I buy.

But this is the way I found out we're doing this now. 😅

[-] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But also I think because all the existing cocoa producers are evil enslavers. This will help something like 1800 Mexican farmers.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Nestle is notoriously evil - I'm hoping Mexico can compete

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

they have aggressively tackled obesity in recent years

Actually doing something? Good on them!

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Government should probably provide the cheapest food and set the standard.

However ideology like this leads to issues in reality.

If a competitor gets lower prices would hint at some questionability. Government correction becomes suppression. Suppression leads to . . .?

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

Less profits for shareholders? And that is unacceptable!

/s

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

However ideology like this leads to issues in reality.

Issues for who? The consumer? Or the capitalists?

If a competitor gets lower prices would hint at some questionability.

It would hint that it's a shitty product, presuming no foul play by the government and the product is not overpriced (doesn't appear to be).

Government correction becomes suppression. Suppression leads to . . .?

Government correction how? From suppression I think you mean lowering their price? The scenario you're laying out doesn't make sense.

The point of this kind of product is to be the baseline, no capitalist should be able to afford to offer the same product for less, because the government already has the lowest possible margin.

You start by making a better product, and you can charge whatever people decide the improved product is worth. It's a good thing that an asshole capitalist can't market a $7 bar of chocolate when a very good quality one is $1. At that price difference, your chocolate better be amazing.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

Uhh what?

It’s called competition. Having a competitor in the market who’s goal is to keep people fed instead of making money hand over fist would both bring prices down and bring quality up on higher priced items.

If we have to do capitalism, let’s get some not-for-profit competition happening.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago

Hershey chocolate bar is rejected as chocolate because it doesn't have enough cocoa and is contaminated with lead.

Hershey's milk chocolate contains around 11% cocoa solids, meaning it doesn't meet the European standard according to some sources. Therefore, in some European countries, Hershey's is labeled as "chocolate-flavored" or "chocolate-flavored candy bar" rather than simply "chocolate". 

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/consumer-reports-finds-more-lead-cadmium-chocolate-urges-change-hershey-2023-10-25/

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Makes me think of "American Cheese Product," "cheese" that is closer to plastic but tastes and feels like cheese.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago

Not to be outdone, Trump had the following announcement from the White House:

"Today, the USA introduced its new chocolate bar, priced at over $10. Made of 0% cocoa, hydrogenated corn syrup, and trans fats. No natural ingredients, no milk, no vanilla. It's bigly on flavor and very, very, tasty. We are taking pre-orders now at USAChocolate.gov."

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I'm remembering an episode of Doug where they were trying to sell chocolate bars that nobody wanted, with the running gag of them still having last year's bar as a door stop and then at the end of the episode, we are shown that some random series of coicendences had a concrete mixer dumping concrete into the chocolate, explaining why they were so hard and heavy (and inedible).

I can't help but think Trump's chocolate would be the same, but the concrete is purposefully there and not just by accident.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Are you sure they would use TRANS fats?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago

If you haven't had chocolate with vanilla in it, consider trying it. It's my favorite chocolate additive. You need to purge ideas about vanilla being sweet or creamy. It's a tobaccoy rich flavor that adds some depth even to dark chocolate.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago

The lady doing the presentation said that it has 35% of cane sugar.

Also behind her you see "hecho con azúcar de caña" which means "made with cane sugar".

Cane sugar is generally at least a bit refined merely to purify it (so unlike High-Frutose Corn Syrup it's not made by chemically transforming something else).

That said, it's unclear if they use unrefined sugar cane, though that stuff is a complete total pita to work with hence I doubt it's not in the least bit refined.

Mind you I looked around and the info on this is all over the place: like for example saying "no added sugars" but then a bit further it turns out it has "cane sugar", which does mean that sugars were added (as the cocoa plant doesn't produce cane sugar, that would be the sugarcane plant).

Mind you, by all indications this beats almost all North American chocolates, but that hardly a tall barrier to overcome. It's pretty common to find similar stuff in European supermarkets.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

Not the news I was expecting but kind of a cool way to address a variety of issues, like obesity, imports from US, generating revenue, subsidizing a national crop, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Don't get me wrong, I don't ~~Mexico to sell~~ mind Mexico selling chocolate but why are they thinking this is part of their job as government??

[-] [email protected] 104 points 1 week ago

I don’t Mexico to sell chocolate

Well I do Mexico to sell chocolate.

Comedy aside, I think its to address the extraordinary obesity issues that Mexico has faced in the past 20 years. Mexico is in my top 2 of countries I'm moving to as the US collapses, but they have real issues with refined foods and especially added sugar.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago

Cacao is a national treasure, and America floods Mexico with Hershey's, Snickers, and other subpar "chocolate" and destroys local competition with cheap prices.

Fun fact:

The word "chocolate" is derived from the Nahuatl word Xocholatl (chikola-tl).

[-] HobbitFoot 41 points 1 week ago

Mexico has been trying a lot to reduce obesity through various product labeling. This looks like a step in that direction; a snack that uses an indigenous ingredient (chocolate) in a manner that complies with federal guidelines.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

You mean Mexico made certain Goods MORE Expensive but then Offered a Public alternative so people don't HAVE to pay the Increase in Price?

That's STUPID! They should just Slap a TARIFF on it WITHOUT Investment or Alternatives and let their Citizens deal with the Price increase!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago

Try chocolate that wasn't made in America... Then imagine living a country with some of the best ingredients for chocolate making, and only seeing American chocolate on your store shelves... If capitalism is breaking stuff, the government is pretty much the only ones that can fix it. Though when the government is the thing that capitalism is breaking, I can see why you might not want them to do more than they currently do.

Government is supposed to be about pooling money so it can be more efficiently and effectively spent. Economies of scale. Even if the government only half does what you want and half does stuff you don't care about, you are still getting better bang for your buck than if you tried to use your own tiny amounts of money to buy the half you do want.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Try chocolate that wasn't made in America...

I'm actually very fond of the US but the chocolate is absolute filth, sorry lads. I was so excited to try Hershey's and holy moly was it an earth shattering disappointment.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

Governments subsidize foods all the time. Yours probably does, too.

Mexico already has Welfare Stores, and this bar is being made in co-op with Food for Wellness.

https://www.informador.mx/mexico/Chocolate-del-Bienestar-en-ESTAS-tiendas-podras-comprarlo-20250710-0131.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

I don't follow Mexican politics closely, but this could be part of an effort to curb obesity. I've heard they introduced taxes on sugary drinks for this, so this might be another avenue.

If people are wanting cheap snacks, and private companies are only making unhealthy ones, you can introduce regulations to micromanage what they can produce, or you can introduce a complex taxation process to disincentivize sugar snacks. Or you can introduce your own product that meets a perceived unmet demand in an underserved market.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

What is the objective behind selling the chocolate bars? I will have to delve deeper into the topic.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

I would presume it's because they're low in sugar. Due to exploding diabetes rates, Mexico has been making a concerted effort in the last few years to stem the consumption of sugary foods, drinks and snacks, particularly amongst kids. You can't have a cartoon mascot on a box of cereal, for example. They put big stickers over Tony the Tiger before changing the packaging completely. And the cost of snack foods has skyrocketed, making it largely unaffordable for lots of Mexican families. A bag of chips there costs more than it does in North America.

My guess is that this is part of that effort.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

Mexico is in North America

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I always wondered what darker chocolate would be like when first ingredient on the list isn't sugar... Powered milk is sweet by itself, but without all the sugar I think 50% cocoa content might be more powerful than in 50% chocolate we have here in Europe.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I'd love to have a taste.

Too bad I live in Northern Europe...probably not worth buying via the Internet even if it was possible...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
964 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21836 readers
420 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS