420
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

That shithead shouldn't use words he doesn't have any hope of understanding.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

So you want a king, yes? You people sure took a roundabout way to get back to where you started.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 17 hours ago

Party of small government everybody. If they didn't have double standards and lies, they wouldn't have any standards or things to talk about.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Getting rid of congress would make the government smaller

[-] [email protected] 44 points 22 hours ago

Mike Johnson is fucking spooky. I've been saying this for a few years now, when his Covenant Eyes usage made news.

He is a true believer, he's on a mission from god. He's smart. He will not care about the people crushed by the machine, as that is the fruit of their depravity in his worldview.

Watch this motherfucker. Trump and Vance are motivated by greed and power. You need to look to fundamentalist Islamic leaders for a similar mindset to Johnson.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

I would think Netanyahu is closer to the greed and corruption model. He needs the war to keep his slimy ass out of jail.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Netanyahu is a Zionist. The circumstances that he's brought upon himself don't negate that fact.

The US was Zion for almost all of the Jews until the end of WWII. This isn't a coincidence.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 minute ago

okay, that's immaterial to the current discussion.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 23 hours ago

Hey everyone the Constitution is unconstitutional!

-MAGA Mike

[-] [email protected] 16 points 19 hours ago

That tracks. They treat the Constitution the same way they treat the Bible. What is written there doesn’t matter. It’s not a thing that actually exists but a concept, and that concept “says” whatever they want it to say.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

I couldn't have said it any better.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Don’t worry everyone, the democrats will do absolutely nothing to stop them. They are complicit in all of this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

He should, for a change, read and try to understand the Constitution he has sworn to uphold. Or, if he is to stupid for that, have someone slowly explain it to him.

It can't be "unconstitutional" when it is right in the Constitution.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

He doesn’t know what the Constitution is, like he doesn’t know what the Declaration of Independence is as well. He even stated boycotting is illegal, and you shouldn’t protest against Israel.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

The reason he's saying wrong things is not due to lack of understanding. It's because he's a power-mad liar.

[-] [email protected] 171 points 1 day ago

Our Constitution is unconstitutional!

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

By denying the Constitution of the United States in violation of his Oath of Office, House Speaker Mike Johnson is unironically committing treason right now.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

So he's next up to be president.

[-] [email protected] 70 points 1 day ago

Its like they believe "constitutional" means "the way I want it"

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

Why wouldn't it, they do that with everything else. Ask a conservative if they hate something and they say they don't hate because it's a sin. Ask them to describe how they feel, and they describe hate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 90 points 1 day ago

The constitution explicitly says what to do with this motherfucker. Stop being such pussies and do it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago

How the hell can these people call themselves conservative. What kind of conservative calls for greater executive power?

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

They're regressive and refuse to admit it.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They're royalists but don't want to face reality, they want a king but saying that is about the least American thing you could possibly do.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Conservative means "There must be in-groups for the law to protect but not bind, and out-groups for the law to bind but not protect." That's it. They are childish assholes that only care about power for their group, and keeping other people out of power. They are the worst sort of people.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

Funny, that's the same for fascists.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

Well, the War Powers Act is unconstitutional - but in the other direction. Deploying military force requires a declaration of war, which requires congressional approval, but the War Powers Act circumvents that by pretending that using euphemisms to describe military actions instead of calling it war makes it different, somehow.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

So like a special military operation

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly.

See also: Military Operations Other Than War, Low Intensity Conflicts, Police Action (e.g. Vietnam).

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Imagine being so cucked that you give away your already incredibly narrow and ever shrinking powers. What a fucking buffoon.

[-] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago

Good job giving away your own powers dickhead.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

At least dicks can get hard. This fucker has as much spine as a bowl of spaghetti.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

"Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument."

I don't think he was persuaded by the argument, I think he was hoping such an argument existed. Anything for daddy Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

And I want Mike Johnson's balls removed with a falling brick. Pretty please?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Trump cock sucker sucks more of Trump's cock. Fucking cool man. Dems remain nonexistent. I used to think the 'we need a do over' crowd was a bit dramatic but more every day I'm finding it a hard point to argue. These fucking ignorant narcissists just soiling and eroding what our country stands for and the fact that none of our elected officials are doing anything infuriates the shit out of me. Yes I do see the benefit in Judicial actually standing up to a lot of this and celebrate their efforts, but it sdoing nothing to stop them from trying over and over and over.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
420 points (98.6% liked)

politics

24355 readers
3763 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS