866
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
  • Farmington Hills officials are fuming over a glut of unsold Cybertrucks being stored in the city.
  • Tesla has been parking the EVs at a shopping center earmarked for major redevelopment.
  • Officials say the electric vehicles violate zoning codes and are warning the property owner.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Aren’t these atrocities full of nice lithium batteries? If so, confiscated cars can be scraped for parts with the batteries going to hospitals, schools, the ACAB offices and fire departments to be used as backup electricity.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I'm surprised nobody has stolen the rims or the batteries, or even tried to steal the catalytic converter.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What catalytic converter? They're electric.

The metal body panels that have just been haphazardly hung onto the frame on the other hand...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

You sly fox

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

ACAB offices? Never knew they had offices?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Here's a lot I pass by every day.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago

The property owners should seize them for unpaid storage fee's. That has happened in my state. Putting your property on someone elses property is considered a tacit admission of a debt when it comes to storage. Ironically there is another law that states you can't charge for more than six months storage without a signed agreement. However there is nothing regulating how much that fee is. Case in point a person failed to pick up late model car at a towing company for two years. The towing company gave the owner a huge bill and they went to court to get it reduced to six months. The towing company just resubmitted a bill for six months at a increased rate that equaled the amount of the original bill. By the time the asshole who should have come and got their car sooner got through the bill had went up again. It was quite entertaining. to watch.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Everywhere you look in Illinois you'll see variations of "unauthorized vehicles will be towed at owners expense." So I don't know what those guys' problem is; impound them.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago

Tow them and fine them. Simple as that.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Towing them without putting them in tow mode will total them.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Sounds like the vehicle owners' problem. "Unauthorized vehicles will be towed at the owners expense."

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Even better.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

These ugly things need to be in "tow mode"?

I was going to say what a stupid idea, but that's just the tip of the stupid ice berg.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

.. What does that mean?

Every one of these that gets towed unexpectedly is totalled?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Tow trucks have never cared about wrecking their cargo before. Why should they care for Cybertrucks?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

They're just so damn ugly. One pulled up next to me at a light the other day and it looked like a cockroach skittered into my side vision.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I'm honestly impressed by how many I see. It's probably just such an eyesore that I notice every one the enters my fov without fail. I always give those death machine a wide berth, as not only is the vehicle itself deadly, I don't trust the drivers in the slightest.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

This was my first thought. But the top comment talking about the batteries and what not going to hospitals and emergency centers made me feel different, hopeful even. Like, a feeling of organized chaotic good anarchy. Why burn the cars completely, when we can resources the useful parts, and then burn the left over scraps of the worthless useless billionaire? I mean... car.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Oh I mean I totally agree, the "burn them" was just a reflex. I agree that scavenging them for parts would be magnitudes more beneficial to everyone.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

Think of the environment. Scavenge them, fill them with waste after as they are dumpsters anyway. Let Tesla deal with the disposal, will cost them loads of money, running them further towards bankruptcy.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Together with the billionaires.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

The city should just confiscate all of them. I mean, at this point they are abandoned on city property.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

And send Tesla the bill for recycling cost

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

few cans of gasoline and some matches could go a long way to help solving this problem

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

definitely would rather see people ~~stealing~~ recycling the batteries

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

That's what they're hoping for. If they all caught fire Tesla could put in an insurance claim and get their money back.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Monstertruck v. Cybertruck: Dawn of Justice

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Same thing is happening in Europe with Chinese EVs. Chinese EVs are piling up at European ports because they've gone unsold and the carmakers were way too optimistic or it's some sort of book keeping trickery to rack up the sales figures.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago

God the environmental damage caused by making all these batteries, only to be used in a cyber truck and dumped in a car park.

Remember when Elon was pretending to be saving the environment, well now he isn't.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago

Batteries can be recycled, reused or repurposed. It’s nowhere near as damaging as drilling for/refining/shipping/burning oil and we decided we are perfectly okay with that.

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Elon was always about making money. The marketing department was all about saving things.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] [email protected] 275 points 2 days ago
[-] [email protected] 239 points 2 days ago

And charge them fees. Just like they'd do to any individual. The city could make some real bank.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Did he park them in a lot away from cameras, hoping there would be some "demonstrations" that would then allow him to claim insurance money? Does the policy cover "domestic terrorism"?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Considering the fear people have because EV's could burn all the time, this is a massive threat to environment and should be fixed (or towed & billed).

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Did you know the Cybertruck was designed to mimic a Porsche? Specifically, this one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
866 points (99.2% liked)

News

29616 readers
2970 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS