869
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
  • Farmington Hills officials are fuming over a glut of unsold Cybertrucks being stored in the city.
  • Tesla has been parking the EVs at a shopping center earmarked for major redevelopment.
  • Officials say the electric vehicles violate zoning codes and are warning the property owner.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 56 points 3 days ago

God the environmental damage caused by making all these batteries, only to be used in a cyber truck and dumped in a car park.

Remember when Elon was pretending to be saving the environment, well now he isn't.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago

Batteries can be recycled, reused or repurposed. It’s nowhere near as damaging as drilling for/refining/shipping/burning oil and we decided we are perfectly okay with that.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Batteries can be recycled, reused or repurposed. It’s nowhere near as damaging as drilling for/refining/shipping/burning oil

Why is the alternative to an EV SUV a combustion engine SUV? Why isn't cycling and public transport?

I'm not saving ICEs are good and EV are bad but that maybe... both aren't great anyway, especially when actual alternatives that make people healthier do exist.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Biking doesn’t always work well in the us because shit is spread out further.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Anything else but driving doesn't work well in the US because the "way of life" is indeed car centric. It will never change without infrastructure, including but not limited to bike lanes. Large distances are possible with (electric) bike but this at least needs to be safe.

So... yes I'm not advocating for somebody leaving the middle of absolute nowhere to give up on their cars. This is not even about cities (as the article mentions a parking lot I assume it's next or even inside a city).

No, my point instead is to question the false dichotomy.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I agree we shouldn’t have set things up as we did but it’s done and there is no way I’m biking what would be a 40 minute drive to microcenter.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I did spend last week biking 45min somewhere and back (so 1h30) for 4 days in a row. It's not for everyone ... but not only it's feasible but (and I know it will sound crazy to some) I actually did enjoy it. On the last day I even did the last trip with a new friend, chatting the entire ride.

Again, I'm not arguing that anybody should do that, or have fun doing, only that's it not impossible.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The lithium mining process is laborious, dangerous, and releases radioactive elements into groundwater and into the air as mine tailings. Not to mention, most of Earth's lithium reserves are in Chile, Bolivia, and Rwanda. With Western investors backing corrupt national governments, this means that exploitative labor (read: slavery) is the primary means of extraction.

It is, in comparison to other extraction methods, literally just as bad.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Mexico has a giant deposit but they insist on silly things like environmental regulations.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Actually lithium isn’t the long term plan, it’s just the plan for today. Sodium is the long term. But huge lithium deposits exists in the US and China too.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

You can even filter it out of the oceans. It's just not worth the cost right now

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Agreed. The person you're responding to is using the same logic as "wind turbines kill birds", "EVs run on FF electricity", etc. Anyone trying to convince you to let perfection get in the way of progress is almost certainly being disingenuous, or at best has been talked into it by someone who was.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

They absolutely will. Those minerals are valuable.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Wait, where is this parking lot again?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Lithium is pretty stable. Those dumbtrucks will rot there for some time, then got reposessed and eventually moved to a recycling plant, and almost all of the lithium will eventually be used for something useful.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

They probably won't even actually recycle the batteries. The packs and batteries are still gonna be good. They'll just pull the whole battery packs out and use them in other vehicles or stationary storage.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

They literally already are and have been for years.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Lithium mining is horrible for the environment too. I don't think that's a bit improvement over gas\oil

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

It happens once and is reusable forever. It’s a massive improvement.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

Sure, and it's a good interim tech until we get things like hydrogen working better.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Dude hydrogen is a bait and switch. We’ve had hydrogen engine tech forever. As for the source, you CAN get it from water after putting in more energy into it than you get out of it, or you can just refine it from oil. Guess what the plan has always been?

Hydrogen is just a way to greenwash big oil.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

there are modern ways of doing it they're pretty efficient from what I've been reading using natural gas and water or electrolysis but I'm no scientist so I'm not going to try to explain it here I think maybe you should look into some more modern methods than what you're talking about.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Natural gas is not green. Not even close. It’s just more convenient. Electrolysis cannot magically be made more efficient here either. It takes a certain amount of energy to break those chemical bonds and you can’t magically break those bonds using less energy. The amount of energy you get from burning that hydrogen is less than what you put in to break those bonds via electrolysis.

I actually do know what I’m talking about here.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Elon was always about making money. The marketing department was all about saving things.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

The batteries could be salvaged and used for something useful.

load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
869 points (99.2% liked)

News

29646 readers
3991 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS