this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
991 points (94.7% liked)

Political Memes

8074 readers
2974 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Missed a few.

Johnson: use war to win re-election

Nixon: fight hippies and commies

Ford: pardon Nixon

Carter: attain energy independence

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

Now that's an infographic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 hours ago

Oops, all Heritage Foundation.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Rich people are richer than ever though, so at least the red party delivered.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I would point out that, objectively, Clinton did achieve a budget surplus, and Kennedy's program eventually got us to the moon (though he, obviously, didn't live to see it). Say what you will about the ACA. No matter what standard you take, that's at least a 2/3rds success rate for the blue party by your measure.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

ACA was a huge success in the millions of additional people with healthcare. This saved lives. Lots of lives.

The possibility of Universal Healthcare was dropped: this was not a goal of ACA. Most of us expected a follow up to ACA that would do that, but too many people voted for politicians fighting against it. Despite ACA being overwhelmingly popular, it hurt Dems in elections and they really haven’t had an opportunity to do much since

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Which let’s be real - the only reason there was opposition to the ACA was because Obama did it. It was basically RomneyCare. Most people (on the right) opposed to the ACA didn’t actually know why they didn’t like it - it was done by that uppity guy who wore a mustard suit.

My little brother has a genetic disorder - already had multiple, intensive surgeries by his tenth birthday. He would have capped out his lifetime insurance payouts around the time the ACA passed. He would probably not be able to get any form of insurance now because of his preexisting conditions, if not for the ACA.

The ACA’s problem was that it did not have a public option. We aren’t operating under a free market - insurance companies are colluding with each other and hospitals. There is no actual competition. Even if universal healthcare wasn’t a moral imperative (how the fuck do you keep up your insurance when you’re sick? when the company you work for fires you because you miss too much work?), it’s also not even being run by the rules of the “free market.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

If I remember correctly a survey of people was done asking how they felt about "the ACA" and how they felt about "Obamacare." They approved of the ACA and HATED Obamacare...

Fucking propaganda man...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The ACA’s problem was that it did not have a public option.

That's still rationing healthcare by wealth. The problem with the ACA is that it was written by liberals and relies on capitalism. The best healthcare systems use central planning and are free or near free.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I mean, agreed, but at least having the public option would drive down some prices. Our health care system is a failure even by the standards of liberal capitalism.

Rolled my ankle a few weeks ago - probably fractured it, hobbled around and now I can walk on it without hurting. No medical care - I’m saving up $300 for my blood work for my routine check up and figured that even the Urgent Care would do nothing and charge me $100 for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

The ACA gave me affordable healthcare when I was young and poor and had none.

Republicans have never even come close to doing something like that for me. Quite the opposite actually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I would point out that, objectively, Clinton did achieve a budget surplus,

That's not even a worthwhile goal. The state can print money for whatever it wants. Clinton didn't change any of that. The state still wastes endless resources on the MIC, imperialism, etc. while many people lack basic human needs: food, shelter, healthcare, livable environment, etc.

Zero is a meaningless goal that changed absolutely nothing, especially long term.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago

Theodore Roosevelt: Be a badass mother fucker

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah let me ignore all the atrocities that blue presidents committed abroad, those don't count since its brown people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The two party system is cooked.

Nothing will get better till the two party system is a thing of the past.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

Gotta switch to proportional representation if you want to break up the two parties. I suggest Sequential Proportional Approval Voting for multi-winner elections, and pair it with regular Approval Voting for single-winner elections. Both can be implemented at every level in the US, and some places can do so by referendum. Lemme know if you're interested.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Weird cuz a lot of things Clinton did seem to be more money for rich people too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That was always their secondary goal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Reducing the deficit by cutting things that benefit the working class coincides with money for rich people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

It's not about the party or the POTUS, it's all about the oligarchs who are funding the parties and really make things happen. All of them were in debt to oligarchs and had to return the given money for the campaigns somehow. Don't be fooled, as long as the funding of political parties isn't reformed to prevent these oligarchs to grab everything there will not be much for the rest of us. Just enough to avoid revolt and riots as long as sustainable. Democracy in the USA is a mascarade.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

Dems: More money for millionaires. Reps: More money for billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

But but Donny gonna send us $5k by Febru-sprin-summer!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Arguably, all were successful except Obama.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It was too partisan I think. The ideals of universal Healthcare were not fully realized but definitely did expand Healthcare access, which isn't enough.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There were a couple corporate dems that ratfucked progress

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

The dems could have kicked them off all committees, the president appoints the head of the IRS and the Attorney General, either of whom can fuck a politician up, or just removed the filibuster. Pelosi chose to let Liberman be the villain of the week. Same shit we saw under Biden where every week 1 dem or another or the parliamentarian or norms would stop the democrats from doing anything that might improve people's conditions (and get the dems reelected).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

"Successful"

load more comments
view more: next ›