this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
104 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8392 readers
250 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"We need to sex up your wardrobe. What do you mean you're not comfortable wearing that? Oh honey, don't be such a prude, all the girls are doing it and you want to be successful don't you? No one's going to watch someone that dresses like their grandma."

I get sick and tired of so called leftists equating exploitation to sexual liberation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm annoyed that our ace users are being exposed to this discussion. Not every space has to be sexualised. It's not prudish, it's just respecting people's differences.

Please just spoiler tag it. It's not a big deal.

Yes, our site culture is a little different - it's trying something unusual - but for some people having an extremely LGBTQ positive space where sexual content is opt-in is like drinking the most refreshing glass of water you'll ever experience.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

for some people having an extremely LGBTQ positive space where sexual content is opt-in is like drinking the most refreshing glass of water you'll ever experience.

Seconding this, I much prefer this type of stuff being opt in

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Really don't comment on people's appearance unless its positive (and not positive in the sense of "I'm helping them!", like genuine... idk), and even then never with strangers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

Only comments I ever make on people's appearance are if they've clearly put thought and effort into something about their outfit and it may brighten their day to hear those choices validated. And it's gotta be something innocuous that can't come off as sexualizing them like, "love those spider earrings" or "the birds on that dress are great". Basically, validating the choices and efforts someone's made about their outfit, never anything about their actual body because 1. that's very invasive and unwanted and 2. there is only a very small degree to which people have any control over their bodies' appearances.

It's weird but I've gotten compliments from people, mostly women, on my body, out of nowhere, and it's just come across as creepy. It would have been much appreciated if we were together or had some established relationship but these are complete strangers commenting on how nice my eyes or arms or facial structure is and I'm just like "get away get away get away"

But someone commenting that they like my death to fascism shirt, or some band shirt? That's totally fine.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I saw a guy with a cool mohawk the other day and I said "nice hair" and he looked like he thought I was insulting him. kitty-cri

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the ironic compliment has destroyed a generation of people's ability to take any compliments

Which is why i always respond to compliments with "Thanks, it has pockets!"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think when it comes to critical comments the "can it be fixed in 10 seconds" rule is great.

Someone has something on their face? Tell them they can fix it.

They look tired? They can't help that shut up.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

I think a big part is trust of the person saying it. Plenty of people have appreciated it when I've notified them of a make-up gaff (that they were previously unaware of). (also I usually look slightly concerned for them)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

That's not prudish that is reasonable. Prudishness is when people think less of people who enjoy sexualising themselves or demand that perfectly harmless behaviours be 'kept behind closed doors' and so on.

Edit: to be concrete if you find sex as a hobby more controversial than carpentry you might want to examine why. Or if you complain about 'public displays of affection' but think that people whinging about punks playing street music are frustrating boomers maybe you're confusing your own preferences with moral truths.

But sexual liberation is for everyone, including people that want as little sex as possible. It's about a world where we respect each other, and recognise that what people do or don't do doesn't suddenly become a huge fucking deal because it relates to sex and sexuality. Wanting to avoid sexual attention, or not caring one way or the other, is just as valid as wanting to center your whole damn life about it.

We're all just food for worms.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Edit: to be concrete if you find sex as a hobby more controversial than carpentry you might want to examine why.

It's bullshit really. It's perfectly fine and normal for my neighbours to wake me up a 3 in the morning with their hobby, but if I take out my hammer and nails to finish off that chair, suddenly I'm the bad guy!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Noise pollution ordinances are a fascist conspiricy to keep the shift-working chainsaw sculptor down.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't even think the original post you made this post in reference to said anything remotely like that but the title of your post is not wrong.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It gave me that impression though, calling Hexbear prudish and puritan

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It gave me that impression though

oh well shut down the entire fucking site, someone got the wrong impression??

Like if anything I think this post kinda validates their claims of Hexbear being prudish and puritan because here you are going "This might cause a struggle but: Calling people prudes for not wanting to sexualise themselves is bad" when the post you're referencing never did that lol.

Swear half the 'struggle sessions' on this site are someone getting the wrong impression from a post and suddenly going "WOW Hexbear is on some shit, there have been multiple posts calling for Hexbears to sexualize themselves and calling Hexbears who don't want to do this prudes"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I get your point lol

Keep in mind that I am very stupid

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't mean to come off so angry and do not want to imply that I think you are stupid - so apologies if it read like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's really just acephobia.

Leftist and even specifically queer spaces struggle enough with allonormativity as is, but these kinds of takes (calling people prudes for not wanting to sexualize themselves) are just explicitly acephobic, whether they intend to be or not.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

God, thank you for this. My partner and I are both ace and we get called prudes a lot for being repulsed by a sex scene in a movie or a dirty joke or something. "Grow up, you're not 11". BUH.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

The older i get the more i appreciate people checking in before discussing sex, or mybody, or actually just dont talk to me if youre a sexpositive loser enthusiast.

I will be wearing jeans and a tshirt, don't tell me I won't be sexualised for that anyway.

solidarity.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This might cause a struggle

I hope not, it's an entirely reasonable take.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

I made this post because of this recent post https://hexbear.net/post/4904490 which complains about how "prudish" and "puritan" we are.

I usually don't do this but we have been getting an influx of people obsessing over the "loneliness epidemic" stuff and it's starting to bother me.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Folks don't realize how good we have it here. We purposely avoid a lot of sexualized comments and hornyposting. Mods try to be on top of things. And for opsec reasons we avoid posting people's faces. Reddit was so fucking terrible with the comments, the chasers, the "my ladies". Leftist circles already have the terrible reputation of men like Barack Obama using their booklist as a way to pick up girls. People treat the DSA as a dating service. One of the OG admins here had to resign for accusations of dming inappropriately with a person in discord.

That shit causes a lot more trouble online than what it's worth.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I've noticed that a bunch of dudes with "problematic" opinions all joined around a month ago. And all of them seem to be determined to make this "their space" instead of accommodating their attitudes to match the space.

As a cis(?) white dude, it's basically what we've been taught subconsciously by society, that you need to "make your mark" on a space. Thankfully, this is one of the best places on the internet to call out that sort of behaviour.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

first pronouns OP on that thread has is they/them, comrade

don't disagree with your point, and it's annoying when people (deliberately, imo) misunderstand the volcel bit, but we don't have to misgender those doing it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (20 children)

oh god no. that post sucks ass.

rant, CW: talking about porn and kink, specifically chokingi've noticed this rhetoric, that porn addiction isn't a thing, multiple times here lately. i don't quite get it, but it seems like they're trying to excuse porn consumption as, likee something that doesn't impact anything? which seems very incorrect to me. as someone in bdsm spaces (insert joke about ace ppl being rly into kink here), we've noticed an increase in hardcore acts being normalized in vanilla spaces. this coincides with them being normalized more in porn. the most obvious one is choking. breath play is really fucking dangerous and requires clear consent, but since it's normalized in porn (where consent can HOPEFULLY be discussed off camera), it becomes normalized in vanilla, where consent rules are NOT really heavily used.

and you can argue this is an issue with most cishet ppl, "normal sexually liberated people" as said in the post, not understanding consent, but acting like porn had no influence on this trend is craaazy. and acting like people are evangelical freaks for being concerned about the normalization of hardcore sexual acts through porn makes me s upset

also acting like it's not a real addiction people deal with is super invalidating. obviously anything can be addictive.

i really hope this doesn't become a trend, since this is the only like, site i can use that isn't overly horny and exploitative all the fucking time

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

hard agree. i absolutely hate being leered at by men and people act like me dressing to avoid that is me falling to the patriarchy, or something? like no, me needing to wear long skirts instead of short skirts to not be leered at isn't on me.

also i am not a prude for not liking random male-gazey sex scenes

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

As an ace, I would like to add that calling a sex-repulsed ace a prude is aphobic. l'm not sex repulsed myself, but someone asking you to respect their boundaries when it comes to sex-related topics or not being comfortable around sexual media isn't prudish.

load more comments
view more: next ›