this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
473 points (91.9% liked)

Political Memes

5361 readers
3157 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

They are either Russian trolls or children who have a Disney level perspective on politics, I think. They don't want to recognize that they have very limited options or the harsh realities surrounding them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Not sure which depresses me more.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 15 minutes ago

Im a non-US non-Voter. But I feel the whole "every vote not for harris is a vote for trump" is quite frankly bullshit. People raising concern for palestinian are not trolling, or russian bots or selfish. You just disagree with them and are resorting to name calling.

Here are some facts:

A) early polls show that in swing states, votes for jill stein hurt trump more than harris.

B) if a third party gets more than 5%, this unlocks federal funding for the next election.

C) voting third party shows the actual voter sentiment of tiredness with the two main candidates. It incentivises other politicians to either form more parties or for the main parties to have candidates that represent the population better.

If everyone just votes for trump or harris, in 4 years you guys will be standing in the same place as now or 2016. It was the exact same rhetoric in 2016 "lesser of two evils". Obviously something needs to be changed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (8 children)

Let me take a stab at this. As a non American non voter who is interested in the outcome of the election.

There are 3 parties to this discussion: the Harris campaign (Democrats in general), the Gaza issue voter, and the lesser evil voters.

The Gaza issue voters clearly believe a genocide is occuring, sometimes affecting them personally, and funded by their tax dollars. They would like some concessions from the Dems (the only likely party to take any action) and their only bargaining chip is their vote. It is clear to me that, if a large number of Americans felt strongly and this way, action would happen.

The Harris campaign has been non responsive on this issue, trying to tread the thin line, where they not only look powerless politically, but also unwilling to take a moral stand for what is right.

The lesser evil voters are absolutely correct that she is still better than Trump, and in more ways than just Middle east.

What I think all 3 parties need to do:

The lesser evil camp, instead of mocking the hold outs, needs to pressure the Harris campaign to make a change. Maybe even join them! (See the last point)

The Harris campaign, needs to think long and hard about what they stand for, and the implications of the Republican-lite gamble paying off. There needs to be some fear of losing voters who they cannot take for granted as they shift to the right.

Finally the Gaza voters. Its fine to play the game of chicken, keep screaming as loud as you can demanding change, but ultimately (secretly) get to the ballot and vote D.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

This is complete trash. There are not 3 issue voters here. There are two. A non-vote for Harris is a full vote for greater support for genocide. A vote for Harris has a chance to change that. Any other thoughts on it are completely ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

..did..you read what I said?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

How is voting for pro-genocide Harris going to reduce genocide?

If you have to choose between losing a hand and losing a whole arm, the correct choice isn’t choosing the hand, it’s fighting back against the system that forces you to make that choice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 45 minutes ago

This sounds like the meme.

"You might lose your whole arm, instead of an hand, but that is a sacrifice that I am willing to take."

Also false dichotomy. You can vote Harris and protest. You could literally vote for Harris and join a violent militia group to overthrow Harris.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Because genocide support from the US under Trump is likely to be substantially worse than it is under a democrat government.

Your metaphor makes no sense because you can both vote for a lesser evil and take action against genocide in lots of other ways (voting isn't the only thing you can do)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 52 minutes ago

I agree with you completely, the problem is that the majority of people will refuse to acknowledge that there’s even a problem to begin with, or even if they do, they act like it’s some sort of fact of reality that they can do nothing about.

All I want from Democrat voters is to acknowledge, “Yes. I am voting for a genocidal candidate, because unfortunately that is the position that my nation’s electoral system has put me in. And I will do everything in my power to change that by …”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And the solution to the trolley problem is obviously to stop the trolley from running over anyone. Thank you for solving this philosophical problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 57 minutes ago

This isn’t a philosophical thought experiment. If there was a real life trolley problem, the solution is to find a way to stop the fucking train, isn’t it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

but ultimately (secretly) get to the ballot and vote D.

By this point, it's too late. Probably already too late now.

You dumb fucks never realized that your true power is NOT your votes. It's your voice. It's the power to convince people to stay home. And you just... kept doing that. There's no threat to be made; the act of making the threat IS the damage.

I'm so tired dude. At least in a month most of you will forget all about Gaza and I won't have to hear about it anymore.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Im not sure I understand. Are you comfortable with Harris' right shift being uncontested by anyone on the left?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Is it not more like "ALL OF YOU WILL DIE" ?

I mean, Israel seems determined on their genocide.....

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago

It really depends on which state you live in whether or not you have the luxury of a protest vote. If you live in NY state that has a 20% lead for Harris, sure, some people can vote Jill Stein or something. But if you live in a state that actually might be close or not an obvious blowout, you can't vote that way. You actually have to be tactical with your vote, not idealistic or symbolic.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

A large portion of the people you're referring to are Arab Americans. In fact, Trump is now leading with them. I also think Trump would be worse for Palestinians than Harris, but I doubt the best way to convince Arab Americans of that is with condescending memes about how they don't care about the Middle East.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

So pandering to idiots is bad when democrats veer to the center to get centrist votes, but it's good when Harris takes a stand on Gaza?

Hot take: morons are morons. Left and right. Fuck em.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›