[–] -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Your reliance on hostility, bad-faith caricatures, and aggressive profanity to “win” a performance is why I blocked you in the first place. By setting up a false binary where any attempt to discuss specific historical structures is automatically labeled a “noble savage” trope, you created a framework that leaves no room for actual historical specificity or nuance. There was never room for a genuine conversation.

"By setting up a false binary"

Excuse me, but you were the one who fucking opened up with

What ever intertribal conflicts happened, they never reached the level of disease spread, displacement, and systematic violence aimed at cultural erasure

Which is utterly and completely wrong on its face, and doubled down on it by vaguely asserting 'culture' as a reason why it didn't happen, despite the ample evidence of intertribal displacement and systematic violence aimed at cultural erasure.

I'm sorry that you're still clinging to notions of a 'noble savage' that dehumanize Native Americans in the hopes of providing a neat and comfortable foil to colonialist atrocities. I'm also sorry that you don't know a single goddamn thing about Native American cultures beyond this noble savage caricature.

You never attempted to discuss specific historical structures, you dismissed a vast amount of historical evidence that any student of the Americas beyond the high school level would be aware of. And, on top of that, you blithely regarded the position as fundamentally not culturally chauvinist to insist that a particular culture engendered pure and noble virtue, unlike those other, evil, colonialist cultures.

Thinkers who argue that culture is not merely a passive byproduct of an economic base, but an active, creative force that shapes human behavior and historical outcomes on its own terms.

Which does not actually address the issue that your assertions had, nor my objections. Since my objection wasn't "Culture doesn't affect anything" but rather "These are all things that quite verifiably happened, and the core reason for them not happening on a larger scale is material, not moral or cultural," especially as your incredibly unserious assertion was on a vague 'Native American' culture, as if there was such a monolith, even just within the continental US, wherein the only real commonality was a chalcolithic or pre-chalcolithic level of material technology. India and fucking pre-Iron Age Germania had more in common than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    I thought you left this place. Why do you keep coming back to a place you hate?

    Good to see you too, my favorite (or at least most dedicated) stalker/secret sweetheart. But as usual, your literacy is as poor as your ability to stay away from me. You know, along with the ableism, racism, fascist apologia, and general horrific bigotry you regularly regurgitate whenever you find me.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago* (2 children)

    I have a lot of rage, tbf, but it's not why I wound down participation. I wasn't tired of arguing or overwhelmed by shitheads on the Fediverse - I'd mostly kept to places that shitheads didn't congregate at by the time I left Piefed.

    It was basically just a policy disagreement with Rimu over admin/coding stuff that affected my experience as a user. That's all.

    When my user experience got more irritating on a technical level and promised to stay that way, I decided that I didn't want to deal with it and couldn't move all my communities again. It was just exhaustion.

    On the Old Place I was never more than a lurker and occasional commenter. I only ran the comms I did because the Threadiverse lacked alternatives, and I didn't want the only topics I cared to comment on to wither for lack of activity.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Ok, but this is good actually, there’s a lot more accounts voting a dozen times a minute for hours than people actually reading a thousand comments a day and responding accordingly.

    By Rimu's own data, there were about five users who were above the 'cap' of 240 a day. None of which he suspected of being bots.

    Sorry that you can't do basic math, or understand that an upvote is precisely so one doesn't have to type a response.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago* (2 children)

    So is what PugJesus was/is doing to various other users. I gave him a taste of his own medicine.

    How utterly bizarre, considering that even at the time you admitted you barely knew me and had rarely read my posts, interacted with me, or had prior problems with me. Or that I've never been unhinged enough to record several minutes of audio in a desperate plea for validation. You threw a shitfit because you were called out for hypocrisy.

    I still haven't listened to the recording because I have better things to do with my time, lmao.

    Also, love that bigotry to you is calling someone a cunt for defending fucking Stalin murdering millions of people.

    Bootlick more.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    I think pug’s departure was mostly a rage-quit, rather than actual mistreatment. But as a history fan i found almost all their posts annoying so i admit that might skew my view.

    Still not sure what exactly your problem was with my history posts, but I'd agree that me winding down activity had more in common with a rage-quit - it was fundamentally frustration in my personal experience using Piefed which led me to fuck off.

    I didn't feel particularly 'targeted' or like Rimu was being unfair on some personal level. It wasn't 'mistreatment', I agree with you. It was just my experience becoming more frustrating than entertaining. So off I went.

    Pug could’ve just kept posting and trusted in the appeal of their content. They didn’t need the ability to upvote more than 240 times a day to keep posting.

    The appeal of my content wasn't in question, though. Like I said, it was a difference in my user experience becoming shittier, not in 'losing' fans or engagement, though I suspected the policy change would also cause long-term difficulties in retention of users.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I can get along fine with just about anyone, dog, human, etc so long as they’re not demanding I share their exact perspective on every country in the world and denouncing me as a fascist otherwise.

    Cute way of describing Uyghur genocide denial.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18210672

    It's most likely from 1984 because it's an episode mostly about the Olympics. Donkey Kong debuted in 1982 and that would probably have been too early to feature it on the show in time and 1986 would have been a little late for Donkey Kong.

    That said, 1982 is definitely a possibility. Or even a different year if they decided to do an Olympics episode in an off-year. Unfortunately, the website regarding the episode doesn't say.

    https://misterrogers.org/episodes/getting-ready-for-the-olympic-games/

    Edit: Thanks to rrconkle@lemmy.zip for getting the year right!

     

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22852955

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10375269

    Matchlock muskets were first introduced into Tibet during the 16th or 17th century, probably via China and India...

    ...matchlocks continued to be used regularly well into the 20th century...

    ...The third broad category of Tibetan firearms, to which this example belongs, comprises muskets with varying degrees of decoration, but fully functional and intended for secular use.

    Decorated muskets of this type were carried by individuals taking part in festivals, on ceremonial occasions, or by the guards of persons of rank...

    Read more about this piece here:

    https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/755339

     

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10338054

    Flintlock hand mortars were use for signaling, launching fireworks, and hurling grenades.

    They would be operated by two men. One who would insert a lit grenade then duck. The first man ducking would signal to the second man, the shooter, the mortar was ready to fire.

    In the event of the mortar not firing when a lit grenade was inserted the operator would throw the device and reel it in by an attached strap.

    Ian's Video: [5:48] https://youtu.be/kf9URQ7X0YA

    InRangeTV Video: [7:01] https://youtu.be/mAzdYxa6kHA

     

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/9916630

    This Sharps rifle bears no maker’s mark; it was made especially for John Brown. Brown carried this weapon on his Kansas campaign in 1856 and later presented it to Charles Blair of Collinsville, Connecticut. In 1857, Brown contracted Blair to forge pikes for the clandestine slave insurrection he was planning for Harpers Ferry.

     

    Text:

    It’s generally the lack of parallel institutions run by workers which sabotage such attempts. Revolutions are generally not powerful enough to do anything but take out the current power; this pretty invariably means the second-most powerful group takes over the role of the overthrown power, or the near-seconds squabble amongst themselves over it. Since dictatorships and other authoritarian regimes tend to systemically crush every alternate power base they can get away with crushing, that generally leaves only those they cannot crush - most often religion in societies which have not experienced a deep secularization, the military, and economic powers in just about every society (in the SovUnion at the end of its life, for example, this was the bureaucracy; whereas we are more familiar with it being capitalists and other private economic actors). So ‘theocracy’, ‘junta’, or ‘something amenable to the economic elite’ are most often the results.

    A libertarian socialist society will emerge when low-hierarchy institutions have considerable support and deeply established roots during a time of upheaval - such as Rojava taking advantage of pre-existing Kurdish revolutionary institutions which were largely socialist or socialist-sympathetic to lay the foundation of the autonomous administration, once both the Syrian government and Islamist forces had exhausted themselves in the area.

    Building parallel institutions now sets up the stage for tomorrow's victories.

    view more: next ›