Criticizing the current administration in charge of the country that supplies arms to a country committing genocide == pro-Trump.
Nobody is talking about Trump BECAUASE HE'S NOT RUNNING THE USA RIGHT NOW. I don't know how it's so hard for libs to understand thus.
But but but but he COULD BE 
It's so American centric. As thought there aren't other people who have nothing to do with this stupid dog and pony show every 4 years.
The eternal election.
So is what is the point of being critical of the party that is pro human suffering.
Like they use it as a positive for their party, being critical of it won't change the minds of those who think Trump is a good/viable candidate
It's kinda funny how liberals would dunk on MAGA types between 2016-2020 when they would say "but her emails" and the libs would say "she's not president!" but somehow they've memoryholed that line of reasoning
Talking down to victims of genocide for not supporting the candidate actively pursuing genocide hard enough is utterly disgusting behavior.
Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds. 
Posting from my wine cave how a Palestinian literally dodging bombs needs to do better and support Madam President...who's dropping said bombs on him.
But have you considered that wet man will drop 1.35% more bombs? :smuglord:
this sparked genuine nausea
How do you become so detached from humanity that you go into reddit tier clapbacks when met with a genocide survivor?
Imperial mindset.
This person needs to be strapped to a chair and forced to watch Shabat's videos for three days straight.
strapped to a chair and forced to watch Shabat's videos
The liberals should all be Ludovico'd. The second they think of a nuclear take such as the above, they will instantly become sick. And the more the libs think of such takes, they sicker they'll get until they throw themselves out of a window or off of a cliff or high rise.
It's either that or the wall.
This first, then the wall if it doesn't work
Hmm interesting you didn’t say Trump should also be forced to watch Shabat for three days
this one right here
this "person" cares more about a spelling incident from the late 1980s than children dying right now
interesting... noticing...
Is "what about trump" their "but her emails"? You expect someone who is dodging bombs to happily join the coconut guild smiley clown that cosigns the bombing and backs the starvation going on? You absolute wanker people dying. This isn't a fucking game for reddit updoots for fuck sakes
I don't know if they just don't conceptualize the genocide as a real event happening in the real world, or they're scolding the victims because being alive is inconvenient to their political program.
This is why i'm thinking we need a name for what Democrats are right now, as a political program. It's not really 20th century fascism. This is novel in some important ways.
Also, like. Jesus fucking christ.
They're nationalist imperialists. I think that is the term we need. Everything about them makes sense through the lens that they only care about their shitty empire. They'll sacrifice anything, any principles, any people, to preserve their empire. They're not, ideologically, Nazis, but they're American supremacists who aren't that far off.
"natsimps"
Good one
A lot of American libs and even "socialists" are just Nazbols: treats and a high living standard for everyone within the nation's borders, death and colonialism for everyone outside of it.
all palestinian violence against israel is self-defense.
I'm for one state solution, from the river to the sea
Straight to 
for this "person."
No results for from:HossamShabat condemn Hamas
If your empathy ends at the border, you don't deserve empathy from outside the border
What about Trump? He isn't funding a genocide st the moment. Trump isn't really part of this
"do you condemn trump?"
"Oh yeah, what about ebil Drumpf? "
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
