goferking0

Why are they integrating unrwa workers???

Isn't the only real difference between the two Meghan constantly brings up her father?

Or quick sprinkle some crack on them to make it look like we had to do it

Same for protecting speech

Joke has more humanity than Tony

I've gotten the same from dnc, just without the picture of a person on it

Treating others like a child and being a pedantic asshole will usually get you that response.

It's amazing how many words you use to also say nothing

Fuck off back to reddit

A 2018 year-in-review and prospective on fact-checking from the Poynter Institute (which develops PolitiFact[27]) noted a proliferation of credibility score projects, including Media/Bias Fact Check, writing that "While these projects are, in theory, a good addition to the efforts combating misinformation, they have the potential to misfire," and stating that "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[6] Also in 2018, a writer in the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as "an armchair media analysis"[28] and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".[29] A study published in Scientific Reports wrote: "While [Media Bias/Fact Check's] credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems."[19]

I'm trying to summarize the wiki reasoning/what's in the wiki page about mbfc criticisms

They're saying the parts mbfc uses other data from is fine, like the fact checking matching others as they all use the same source. But the rest like bias can't be trusted as it's just their own unscientific methods.

Don't go on world politics comm cause they're so excited to see him saying trump will be worse everywhere