this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
174 points (98.9% liked)

technology

23559 readers
102 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 100 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Firefox Mobile needs Tab Grouping tho.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are some addons that do that. That's the good thing about Firefox. Very customisable.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Really, for mobile? Because containers aren't available for Android.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah yeah not sure if they're available for mobile, I meant desktop

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

rage-cry You got my hopes up!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Until Google pulls the payment they do to have it as default search engine and it goes to hell

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Why the fuck does anyone use Chrome? It's shittier than Firefox in every way and is still a leaky memory hog

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's the only browser installed at my work and they won't give me admin access boohoo

[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago

Me 15 years ago, using Firefox Portable with an Internet Explorer container plugin so I can use trash web apps the organization refuses to update.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

my partner has trouble doing some remote desktop stuff with firefox so they have to use chrome

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Google meet screen share doesn't work for me on Firefox, tragically.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Probably intentionally too

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

Most definitely intentionally. Everytime I use Google meet it reminds me that because I'm using Firefox I can't use all the features.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Have you tried Chrome Mask? It spoofs Firefox as Chrome

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

A concerning number of the websites that don't work in Firefox, do work when you pretend to be Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

Less tragic and more criminal, since Google uses its marketshare to essentially control the development of the web.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 6 months ago (2 children)

uBlock Origin fans can rest at ease since a new and improved version is already available - uBlock Origin Lite

The Lite version's capabilities are relatively limited

so-true it's new and improved if you count regressions in functionality as an improvement

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago

Words don't mean anything and I hate it.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago

When shrinkflation advertising comes for your advertising blocking software.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 months ago

Chrome users

well, there's your problem

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago

We will welcome them to Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

adblocking dns providers are a great no-system-resource, no-battery-usage solution that works in any app/program (not only browsers) and can be added for any system, as well as better online privacy especially using encrypted dns

independent-run with added top-level domain support:

corporate:

FireFox and Chrome both have settings to add encrypted dns for the browser.

Recommend setting adblocking dns as default on router if possible, sort of makes any router a pi-hole and then automatically sets these as default for any connected device so you can set it once and don’t have to do every device. Try to use at least two different providers for setups with primary/secondary/tertiary in case one has a temporary outage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Including to vastly more malware ads..

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

Gonna be really funny if it causes something that makes the whole crowdstrike thing look tame by comparison

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I once stood behind someone and watched them click on a banner ad that says “DOWNLOAD NOW!” while trying to download Notepad++

They didn’t see it on the list of apps, so they refreshed the page and clicked on a different download banner ad and installed a second malware lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago

First off don't use chrome.

If you do use it. I don't know use a dns.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago

eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop eat your ad slop or line go down

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (10 children)

Their endgame is hooking directly into the TPM chip on your phone/computer to ensure you can't bypass ads, just like netflix, hulu, etc have done. Then the only recourse will be ripping all their videos to another hosting platform which they will then try to argue is a form of piracy.

This TPM bypassing will eventually be done by essentially pointing a camera at a screen (modern TVs have encryption baked in so even the video in transit is DRM protected), at which point the video hosting companies will bake in small differences/invisible watermarks that uniquely identify which user's account (which is linked to a real person who can suffer legal consequences) the video came from. Then we will have multiple cameras pointing at like 100 screens with an AI mixing them together to try to remove the differences/watermarks, at which point the hosting companies will create their own AI to counter and mislead the "piracy" AI pepe-silvia

This is also why ISPs took away your ability to run a personal server on your home computer using NATs, firewalls, and dynamic IPs instead of just transitioning to IPv6.

Also websites are going to start blocking firefox citing low user counts but you know what the real reason is nineteeneightyfour

I 100% believe this will happen because making commodities do as many as possible between any given creator and end-user just so they can provide more "Services" no one asked for and thus extract more value for not actually doing anything is like the only trick capitalism has left.

it-is-known

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Also websites are going to start blocking firefox citing low user counts but you know what the real reason is

http://cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/mozilla-exec-says-google-slowed-youtube-down-on-non-chrome-browsers/

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (11 children)

small differences/invisible watermarks that uniquely identify

This has never worked so far lol. Their "invisible watermark" always ruins the media even beyond treathog consumption levels.

Otherwise is there anything the individual user should be doing, short of not buying smart TVs (me) and not buying TPM chipped computers?

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

In related news I recently set up a DNS server in my home network with adware/malware blocking and set my router to use it as static DNS so my whole house has to use it, including my parents. It was shockingly easy to do with NixOS.

I'm going to make a separate post on how I did it using an old Thinkpad x220 in case anyone is interested or I get around to doing it.

Anyway, use Firefox and ffprofile creator, it's not that hard.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Please make this post!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

Damn they're actually going through with it...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (4 children)

uBlock Origin will continue to work as usual across other browsers, including Microsoft Edge, Opera, and more.

badeline-disgust

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wait, there's only 30 mil Chrome users? I thought there were way more than that

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The count is supposedly closer to 3 billion, but the article clarifies only 30 million use ublock origin. Which seems devastatingly low to me. Why risk such a move if it only affects 1% of your userbase?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Because it only affects one percent of the userbase. There's no short term loss. Your clients (ad companies, Big Corp) see that you're Doing Something. And, more importantly, Big Tech is removing the copper wiring out of the walls. They want to monetize ad space as much as humanly possible. YouTube is already showing 4-5 ads to normies as we speak.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

My 13 yo cousin won't install or let me install an adblocker on his phone and it's killing me because he keeps complaining to his mom that he needs YouTube plus or whatever it's called, but then I say "sponsorblock is free" and he says "oh I'm used to the ads" aaaaaaaaaaaaa why is he like this?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

"oh I'm used to the ads"

In bad country, the children have resigned themselves in being the target of relentless predatory advertising through an implanted sense of worship to highly marketable treats.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Honestly, it won't be long before you can't use a blocker for those ads anyway. Most services now inject the ads right into the data stream for the video you're watching dynamically. To try and block those ads is to try and block the same video of the content you want to watch.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

The day that happens is the day I go back to the same full-scale, all-media piracy I was pulling in my teens. Pretty sure the old schooner's still seaworthy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

If that happens and it's truly impossible to work around it will finally be the day I get off my ass and read Das Kapital in its entirity.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I don't think this will be as big an issue as people fear. Sponsorblock already is a crowd-sourced method of blocking the same video of the content you want to watch, and it works borderline perfectly. Just do the same but by still or video-clip instead of timestamp, job done.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

well he was raised by youtube. he's been seeing the ads his whole life, sponsor and otherwise. it's like with older people who don't mind seeing ads on their netflix plan - its just tv for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

And this right here is why I dropped Chrome like a heroin habit the minute that they started talking about Manifest v3.

load more comments
view more: next ›