this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
546 points (94.0% liked)

RPGMemes

10287 readers
387 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 95 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 61 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Ive seen this exact joke with another monster

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

Congrats, you've just discovered internet memes.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But this one make more sense because Tanith keeps her word and goes from "would" to "did"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Does that count if it was before she had a hongri snek boi she was fattening up to have as a pre-made sausage?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Same. Yet another internet comic just blatantly stealing from another one.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

it's a reference to elden ring. That's Tanith and Rickard/the serpent.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And the original comic was about A biblically accurate angel. They just ripped it off. I posted it elsewhere in this thread.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd say it's more of a parody/homage, although since the original isn't well-known it needs to be presented along with this one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the original isn't well known

This comic got called out immediately by multiple people

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But it was called a "rip-off" when it was clearly parodying the original.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

That doesn't mean the original isn't well know, just that people often take the worst possible angle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Idk if either of you are aware of this but sometimes, two different people, who have never interacted in any way, can come up with the same idea.

In a world with 8 billion people it's hard to have an original thought and even harder to put that thought out before someone else does.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

It's word for word the same comic and the same angles and everything. Stop trying to be a smart-ass if you don't know what you're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is this the original? Having the "monster" be an angel and labeling the person "monster fucker" makes it actually make sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yep. This comic even has its own know your meme page

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Harsh to call this a "rip-off", then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

... because it's obviously ripping it off?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (12 children)

A rip-off is something that is copying something else while pretending to be original. This is parodying the original.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I still don't get the ,,would".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

In the OP's comic, it certainly takes longer to figure "would what?"

The original above with the angel has "monster fucker" on the person, so it's a bit easier to deduce, "would fuck"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The dragon (and the angel) doesn't want to be seen as someone that a silly human would want to fuck, so it's "you're supposed to be afraid enough of me that you won't want to have sex with me"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Would have sex

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Kind of a meme to say that when you are looking at someone you would fuck

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

He's setting expectations appropriately with that shirt, what more do you want?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

That's not what happens when people use the same word bubbles or images and change them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Meta is self-reference, not just any reference

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So in this case, is the "Would." Implying "I would fuck that."? Is this another format of "Hear me out..."?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I would
(slang, idiomatic) Used to denote that the speaker finds another person sexually attractive.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

13 downvoters are turned-on and mad about it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

No, they just saw the comic that this is plagiarizing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

the Biblical Angel/I Forgot Who It Was one was better

load more comments
view more: next ›