jounniy

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

I think you answered your rethorical question yourself: If it is not in the official books, it is not an official rule.

And I would not say that they leave it vague. To quote the PHB: "To make an ability check, roll a d20 and add the relevant ability modifier. As with other d20 rolls, apply bonuses and penalties, and compare the total to the De. If the total equals or exceeds the DC, the ability check is a success [...]. Otherwise, it's a failure, which means the character or monster makes no progress toward the objective[...]." That does not leave much room for interpretation. It plainly say that if the exceed, then they succeed and if they don't, than they fail. Yes they don't make an explicit remark about critical results, but they don't need to, because such a rule was never meant to exist in 5e aside attack rolls and death saves.

Not to say that you can't make it a rule at your table (same as with everything else), but there is still not much room for missunderstanding the official print.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Yes he is and no it does (edit: has) not. That is a common house rule Larian implemented into BG3, but it is not part of the original rules of DnD 5e.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

What? Don't you dare insult kneebreaker. He's one of the finest works from the 42th generation of smiths.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I love it. The drawings, but especially the moments of characters looking back at how far they have come and remembering all the happened along the way. There is a certain... bittersweet melancholy to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Poor Sildar...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What!? Who is short here? I'll show you short!!

 
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Objection. This is most likely out of character.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I might inject, that this is a very drastic measure that some groups will find to be annoying. As long as they are actually debating constructively, then the example above isn't even needed. If, as the comment says, the debate is going in circles, some groups can be brought back on track by simply telling them: "So guys... What are you going to do? Because you've been doing the same back and forth for half an hour now?"

Not saying that you should not use the above method. Just saying that some players will find that to be an "extreme" solution. Instead, simply reminding them, that they should probably get to a result within the next five minutes can do.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Please. Its not that bad. Baldurs Gate is a nice place. With a lot of crimes. And horrible Living conditions. There are also a lot of politicians. Did I mention all the noise reporters...? Okay maybe it's that bad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Thanks. He seems like a really cool guy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Who ist this guy?

 
34
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›