this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
122 points (93.0% liked)

News

23287 readers
4978 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

His reputation, future, and even perhaps the White House’s destiny, will on Wednesday be placed in the hands of 12 citizens of his native New York City, proving that not even once-and-possibly future commanders in chief are above the law.

Seven men and five women jurors will retire for deliberations on Trump’s six-week hush money trial after Judge Juan Merchan instructs them on the law and their duties. No jury in American history has faced such a task — deciding whether a former president and presumptive major party nominee will be convicted of a crime. And while the jury, which can deliberate for as long as it needs, is bound to decide its verdict on 34 felony charges on the testimony and evidence in the case alone, its decision will reverberate across the nation and the world at a critical moment of the 2024 presidential election.

The trial slogged toward its end on Tuesday in nearly 10 hours of closing arguments that burst into open hostility between rival lawyers.

“You have to put aside the distractions, the press, the politics, the noise. Focus on the evidence and the logical inference that can be drawn from that evidence,” prosecution lawyer Joshua Steinglass told the jury.

“In the interest of justice and in the name of the people of the state of the New York, I ask you to find the defendant guilty. Thank you.”

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think I'll wait for the verdict and sentencing to see whether he's above the law or not

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I predict a guilty verdict for most/all counts and an especially light sentence.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago (3 children)

That's optimistic.

I am expecting at least 1 Trump loyalist in the jury who will refuse to agree to any guilty verdict, resulting in a hung jury and a mistrial.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Exactly no way he gets a guilty verdict.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A single holdout doesn't necessarily mean a hung jury. If there is evidence of juror misconduct, like a juror making any indication that they never intended to be impartial, despite what they agreed to before the trial started, they can be removed and replaced by a backup.

There are 6 backup jurors for this case.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

That’s too many ifs and whens

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

As a European, I’ll never get why Americans think it’s ok to let the general public who are 85% fucking morons be the deciding factor in complicated legal cases. Why do you even have judges and lawyers when in the end they have nothing to decide?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And some bullshit exception will be made so he can still run for the Presidency because someone will allow him to serve his sentence after his potential term. Either that or he'll be made to have some aide follow him around and pretend to act like an ankle alarm because he has a brand to uphold and a real one would cause harm.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

You can run for president from jail

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably 1 month probation and a $50 fine

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

"Think about what you've done. You may go."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Ding! Ding! Ding!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

The scary thing: There are people out there who will change their vote depending on whether or not he's convicted.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago (3 children)

If he's actually convicted and gets any sort of nontrivial sentence I will buy a tub of Ben and Jerry's Churro ice cream and eat the entire thing

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm confused, yet inspired

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Join me brother, nobody knows the joy of cinnamon ice creams

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

The churro chunks are the worst part, but cinnamon ice cream is best ice cream.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

pops a lactaid you sonofabitch, I'm in

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

I hate the gravitas this article is placing on his role! They are deciding, if a person, is guilty of a crime. It doesn’t matter who they were or what they might be. The preferential treamtment needs to stop.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wow, literally the first sentence and already this article is full of shit.

His reputation is set in stone already. No matter what the jury decides he will appeal, and keep appealing until there's no one left to appeal to. He will not drop out of the race even if he is jailed (spoiler alert, he won't be), but assuming hell freezes over he'll still get at least 40 million votes.

Fuck articles like this. Why even post this click-bait trash!?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He's such a low bottom feeder he'll appeal if they find him not guilty on every charge.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He'll be convicted of at least some of the counts, but will immediately begin appealing the decision and won't face any consequences before the election.

Maybe the fact that he's now a "convicted felon" will sway some people, but my guess is that most will simply move their own internal goalposts "since it's still being decided on appeal"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I've already seen bumper stickers to the effect of "The people decide the president, not the courts." I doubt that a guilty verdict will sway anyone's opinion, sadly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I guess they missed the 2000 election.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fuck that, you pessimistic piece of dust. Just gotta put all your doubts and fears out there. Boo hoo.

He's going down. People are going to notice. It will change people's minds. All of them? Nope, fucking obviously. But it will change plenty of minds. Even if it's from a Republican vote to "I'll vote Republican when they can field a non-felon."

Keep your shitty pessimism to yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

“This time I’m going to catch him”

  • Wile E. Coyote
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

AintNothinGonnaHappen.gif

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

A lot of things have to go right for him to be convicted, just one juror having doubts will let him walk. And because Americans are provably more likely to be narcissists who love to be “the devil’s advocate” to feel important, I can’t see any situation where they all agree and he’s convicted.

Which of course in his braindead supporters minds will mean that he’s also not guilty in all the other cases.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I was wrong! WTF I love the American justice system now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can you imagine trump in a terminator movie?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

If they make Terminator vs. Predator, he’d be a natural fit for the Predator given he likes to rape minors.