this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
131 points (100.0% liked)

hexbear

10255 readers
1 users here now

Now that the old Hexbear fork has been officially abandoned, this community will be used as a space for meta-discussion on the site itself.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

db0 and Unruffled have both been banned for reactionary behavior and, in the case of the former, DM harassment.

Due to these irreconcilable differences we thought it only right to allow the community to weigh in on defederating immediately.

According to this person "tankie" is anyone that criticizes the privilege of white westerners in the imperial core who have been privileged and comfortable their entire lives off of the backs of colonized people.

Further context can be found in this thread

https://hexbear.net/post/2484423

As always, use dean-smile to vote for federation and dean-frown to vote for defederation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

dean-smile

Have seen users from db0 genuinely learn about communism and radicalise because of their exposure to this space. Every single defederation reduces the number of people that get radicalised by our existence.

Flatworm is a dumbass though. Obligatory: https://clips.twitch.tv/SlickBigHorseCharlieBitMe-e2zKKUMBO_pVNOhd

Also recently came across Vijay Prashad talking about the word a while back: https://youtu.be/tsqE9kEsDVY

This is amusing because these people all love Chomsky and Prashad+Chomsky both work together, Prashad is unironically one of the people they would call tankie and the two have an extremely close relationship, literally writing books together. Prashad's institute (tricontinental) published this on China's Socialism 3.0

Just a few things to think about in case any of you db0 anti-tankie folks are lurking.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 6 months ago (1 children)

dean-smile I always feel that we should leave the door open just in case some of their users are based, or can be convinced, just like I was convinced.

I was a Reddit lurker escaping to Lemmy and was already anticapitalist but just had a bunch of brainworms left. I didn't trust the "red fash tankies" based on all the yeonmi-park stuff that's everywhere. But scrolling around lemmygrad and hexbear for a while had me scratching my head and wondering what all the fuss is about. Clearly you guys are NOT some kind of weird crypto fash thing but are actually very educated with sound analysis of history and politics. So if there are more people like me who are curious, then we should leave the door open.

Of course, if it becomes untenable (like how shitjustworks went full nazi bar) then we shouldn't bother exposing our comrades to bigoted harrassment. Yes, it seems like the admin(s) are libs, but a piracy-based instance is always gonna have some anticapitalist lean, so it's less likely for dbzer0 to go full nazi bar.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is where I'm at on paper the piracy sub should not be having the issue of bootlickg for capitalism you'd think that would be an untenable position for the mods of the instance to have. Hopefully some users have a moment of clarity seeing their mods talking shit about "those dirty communists" on an instance about how piracy is necessary to circumvent the effects of capitalism

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago (1 children)

>named unruffled
>is clearly ruffled

dean-frown

there are some good users there that occasionally post here but if db0 has revealed themselves to be a full-on reactionary things from that instance will only get worse

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

dean-smile

I've been quite outspoken about how I think Unruffled and db0 are total clowns, but aside from the mods, I don't have much of a problem with the instance itself. One of their own users even reported db0 for being a bootlicker lmao, so they're alright in my book.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

One of their own users even reported db0 for being a bootlicker

Damn I might change my vote to fed now lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

:gulaggulag

dean-smile

Banning the admins but not the instance is just too good of a bit.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

dean-smile

EDIT: changed my vote to stay, people here are right, banning the admins and then staying federated is a phenomenal bit.

lmao fuck em. Anyways, for anyone who wants context on the dm harassment stuff, here is our lovely convo.

The last post came in right before they were banned. I don't know if any response would go through, and frankly I don't care to continue the conversations.

Also, the operandi thing was very much to tilt them. Anyone who has seen me type here knows I physically cannot type "you", it only comes out as "oyu".

Further also, they edited their second comment:

The link is to here. No idea what doomtown is, but the card art is neat. The pfp still looks like linkara trying to trike a pose. Anyone who wishes to continue mocking that pfp, go here.

I've had runins with unruffled (critical levels of ruffled) before. I find them both distasteful. There are a handful of db0 users I like. They are welcome to migrate here, or to any of the instances still federated with us. The rest of them, mao-wave

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Also unruffled defended a zionist and said "from the river to the sea" is antisemitic

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

If you want to talk politics, you’re gonna have to accept the fact that people will have different opions. This isn’t hexbear where everyone with a different view is instabanned. I get that emotions are running high over the situation in Gaza, but try to respond in good faith instead of leaping to the most uncharitable interpretation possible

It seems to me that you are the only person badjacketing in this post. If you think it’s a good policy to ban fellow anarchists for having a nuanced view on the Gaza situation, then you might want to check out hexbear - intolerant authoritarianism is their whole vibe.

Anarchism is when you have a nuanced view on genocide. Not having a nuanced view on genocide is authoritian and bad. maybe-later-honey

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I get that emotions are running high over the situation in Gaza

stalin-gun-1stalin-gun-2

No words

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

Politics is about being unemotional and never becoming too invested in any given subject, and the more detached and ineffective your engagement in politics is, the more correct you are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

But also how dare you interpret me uncharitably, don't you red fash authoritarian commie fucks understand that respect is a two way street and you OWE me a baseline of charitable interpretation?peppino-angry

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't know what you're talking about. Clearly spamming the mods and calling them scum-fucks will create a situation where you will be unbanned and all of Hexbear will come to your defense!

This is some genuinely unhinged stuff.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago

Don't ask me, I'm a non voting felon

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

dean-smile Is anyone actually bothered by these guys? They do more to show people how liberal foreign policy is just imperialism than I do.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think we should absolutely draw the line at dm harassment after being banned from a single comm on top of all the bullshit from both of those users over the entire time we have been federated.

I think the thread linked is pretty damning on its own along with db0's long habit of getting into arguments like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

Since I'm tankie-adjacent (meaningless term, more lore in the original post) and had to do with the affair I'll just voice my opinion: I've seen many good people coming from that instance, both on hexbear and outside hexbear, some of them even comrades. Punishing them for the actions of their mod team seems a bit too much to me. The offenders have (rightfully) been banned from this instance, and on the rare occasion a wandering lib will post on here we can all PPB them, I'll join too.

Also, semi-related but I love how just by shitposting on a piracy community I caused an inter-instance diplomatic crisis and had 2 (PoS) admins banned, lol wasn't my intention but I'm glad they showed their true self, so to say.

Edit: also remaining federated while having the admins banned is such a power move lol, "hate da gubmyent not da paypoohl" but for real this time

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

dean-smile

it's really funny to be federated with an instance that we've banned the admins of and I want to maintain the bit for as long as possible because they're the only abject toxic actors that there's an actual conundrum dealing with on the site, and they're dealt with, so unless they pull some bullshit with socks/targetted fuckery through some abuse of federation which would get them seen as a bad actor not just on hexbear, it's not a problem. No matter what, the outcome is funny and/or pathetic.

also love that part of the tide shift on this is people realizing how funny the current situation is che-smile

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

dean-smile

This feels like a very sudden gutteral reaction to very recent events. We generally get on well with dbzero as an instance, even if the mods are lib-brained.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

dean-smile

Stay fed'ed. "Posting isn't praxis" yada yada, yeah, but there are plenty of radlibs who call themselves anarchists that are ripe and even open to being properly radicalized. When hexbear gets cut off from other instances, it makes it all the less likely that well-meaning radlibs will have a chance to see good, genuine leftist takes, which does influence them (as many have outright said.) Dbzer0 serves as part of the pipeline from radlib to actual anarchism and/or communism. Defederating effectively caps the pipe at radlib and we shouldn't do that unless absolutely necessary to protect BIPOC/trans/neurodivergent/etc. users here. And I think it's safe to say dbzer0 as an instance is far from being a danger in that way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

dean-smile

Fuck those enlightened centrist "anarchists", let them whine about how authoritarian it is that they can't comment here anymore after acting like assholes and having "nuanced views" on genocide.

Still, I think the instance has some good people that would be a shame to lose if they aren't ready yet to make an account here. Being open to instances that resemble more closely the actual society we're trying to change will always be a great way for people to get radicalised and take their first steps of learning about Marxism and socialism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago

dean-smile

I changed my mind, staying federated but banning the admins is hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

dean-smile

I don't normally vote in these things but I think it would be pretty funny if we were federated with an instance where all the admins have a permanent ban. I don't think the average user is too bad, just keep mr Divided By Zero and Jeff Bridges Avatar lib banned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago

Pls dont I like it here

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago

dean-smile The dbzero0 users have been cool. If the admins are actually a problem, then they'll escalate or defederate themselves eventually, but in the meantime their cooler users will have more time to decide to jump ship to hexbear. If banning their admins while not defederating them is actually enough to stabilize, and everything works out, then that is extremely funny.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

dean-smile It's so much better to remain federated with just their admins banned.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

I was one of the initial advocates for defederation and I have changed my position. This is the funniest option.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago

dean-frown I like their cool users and hope they come to Hexbear but the admin team is unbelievably embarrassing and infantile. DM harassment is completely unacceptable and as admins they should know that acting that way is gonna get their whole instance defederated

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm recusing myself because i never wanted to federate in the first place but why do people think coming here and arguing that we're red fash tankies is a good use of their time?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

dean-smile Banning the admins of an anarchist instance is just common sense. The good dbzer0 users make federating the instance and banning reactionaries on a case-by-case basis worth it, IMO

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

dean-smile As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say we are tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We know that when the people understand, they cannot help but follow us.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

It's gonna be a tentative dean-smile from me. I see the argument for defederation but honestly db0 is like the most harmless kind of shitlib and I find his contributions to the internet slapfight more cute than anything. If it were my choice I'd unban db0 with a stern warning or whatever, keep this unruffled loser banned, and stay federated

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

dean-smile No need if those shitty admins were banned. There are cool people on the instance and we can ban the rest.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

dean-smile I think we should be federating more, not axing the few left

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago

dean-smile

I've seen increasing numbers of dbzero users with decent opinions around here lately, and I mostly like their piracy comm.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

A regrettable, but necessary, dean-frown.

hesitation-1

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

dean-smile

the argument that staying federated with their admins banned is a very good bit won me over

chefs-kiss

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (7 children)

dean-frown

honestly i think the threshold for defederating with other instances should be very low, and harassment from instance admins is certainly above that. If we defed from an instance, the worst thing that happens is... people from one instance can't use the same account on the other. The horror!

I don't care if that makes our community less discoverable, or lessens the flow of dunkable libs. Having a non-shitty place on the internet to enjoy isn't something to take for granted.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

dean-smile

If the offending users are banned, it should be fine. The moderator on DB0 that caused this whole mess was just your classic internet mod taking a meme personally and getting offended. I still don't understand how someone can get offended at first world privelege getting called out, it's the most obvious and visible type of privelege that even libs and chuds recognise. To deny it's existence would be to live in an alternative reality and be even more insulated than your average lib or chud.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

dean-smile I think banning problem users is always better than cutting off entire instances. I do feel guilty for the work it causes mods/admins.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

dean-frown

There’s some good people on there who could be comrades. They’re welcome to make accounts here if they care enough

load more comments
view more: next ›