Look, if you take the total human population and look at how many are British evolutionary biologists, it’s an infinitesimal percentage, practically nothing. So we can discount the existence of Richard Dawkins.

what i'm hearing is that there are greater genders that we have not yet had the bravery to discover

It kinda boggles my mind that an evolutionary biologist and atheist has their knickers in a twist due to intersex, trans, and non-binary gender. Bro, if god isn't real, the world is a fucking chaotic mess that decides what does and doesn't work for weird and abstract reasons, and the social construction of God, and binaries are what stop us from advancing. Can you please move the fuck on from people's genitals? You sound like a fucking deacon at a church, you weirdo.

Biological sex is a fucking mess and the roughly 2% estimate that chuds freak out about is itself a very conservative estimate. The load bearing cope that leads them to denying even this is the belief that conditions like Klinefelter syndrome or Turner syndrome shouldn't be counted as intersex conditions. Diagnosis rates are also incredibly low, largely because of bigotry.

The reality is that not only is the scope of which conditions are considered intersex far too restrictive (even where the 1.7-2% estimate is reached), but these conditions are massively underdiagnosed. A more realistic and all-encompassing view of intersex conditions with an accurate diagnosis count should result an incidence rate of around 5% of the global population, with rates somewhat higher in some communities.

People cannot handle this reality because it destroys their world view.

The problem your point here has is hydrogen can't be helium

That doesn't even have anything to do with the point, the point was that you can't just say something doesn't exist because you arbitrarily decided there's not enough of it. If there was one unicorn in the world, would you say unicorns don't exist?

Always fun when an evolutionary biologist is like "No we actually can fit everything into neat human categories with no outliers or anything. Because statistics."

Elements kinda do look like pronouns 🤔

"Hydrogen can't be helium"

WHERE THE FUCK DO YOU THINK HELIUM CAME FROM, THE DEPTHS OF MY ASSHOLE?

It's cool how checks notes Richard Dawkins singled out intersex as the only legitimate non binary/trans identity in order to minimize the existence of trans people just because it makes it look smaller on the graph.

Wow hes so fuckin objective, I'm sure because he's so rational there's no way there's an ulterior motive for making this point.

Metals are just transhydrogen

Indeed, hydrogen can't be helium (except in the case of bigender comrades): that's why trans women are women, not men; and trans men are men, not women. Glad everything is understood.

Why have so many of these outspoken atheist figures started aligning themselves with some kind of de-facto chud shit?

represent their frequency by NY's twin towers

You mean the things that aren't standing anymore?

Me:

Gender:

Someone did 9/11 on gender (please please let me be the first person in the thread to make this joke)

Hydrogen Atom: Fuck being Hydrogen, Gimme another proton

becomes Helium

Aaaahhhh yeah!

If you think about it the Earth is kinda trans because it has so much of the other elements

I am shocked, SHOCKED to learn that Richard Dawkins is a transphobe. Well, not that shocked.

Mfer doesn't know how helium is made lmfao