[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I agree. Nevertheless, people here prefer arbitrary decisions based on rules that are so broad that they only encourage arbitrary decisions by the moderators. From this, I can only conclude that even the people here would rather be entertained than face the adversities of reality.

For me, that is unacceptable - so I'm moving on.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I've tried so many comms by now that I've lost interest. From now on, I'm just not going to post anything anymore. I've said this to myself many times before for the very same reason, but the downvotes on this post confirm it unequivocally. I obviously have no business being here.

Feel free to take a look at my profile to decide whether I really am such an unpleasant person that I shouldn't be allowed to express my views in any community with some viewability.

This struggle is simply not worth it to me. I've also cancel my financial support - I'm sure you'll manage well without me.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's an example: I posted on /c/unpopularopinion that it can't be right that even a well-known actor like James Van Der Beek is becoming impoverished because he can't afford the cost of his cancer treatment. I posted there because I know from experience that this would not be allowed in other communities because it is supposedly a political post - even at unpopularopinion, the post was removed by the moderators.

Therefore, I believe that this arbitrary rule is completely absurd.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Go back to reddit please.

I've been here for more than two and a half years, trying to contribute something because I thought it was important. I'm starting to think more and more that it was a wasted effort. Thank you for pointing that out so clearly once again.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Why, it's the truth. The US is ruled by a third-rate TV personality who could only become president because his father was a billionaire. That's a fact.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The man was a megastar in the 90s... With a hit TV series that ran for six seasons during the heyday of the medium. He also starred in various Hollywood films. I really don't know what else there is to relativize.

Edit: But hey, maybe you still have to sugarcoat it somehow because the US president is a third-rate television personality, just like most of his cabinet. These people are actually forgettable, but because they have rich parents, they are the government, rape children under state protection, and get away with it completely unpunished because the US population lets it slide.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The "destruction of civilization" is what the US regime is pursuing: Not only is it doing everything in its power to reverse all civilizational progress in its own country, but it is led by an organge-colored rapist whose only ambition is to enrich himself and protect himself and his degenerate co-conspirators from prosecution for the most repulsive crimes imaginable.

A transatlantic alliance with such monsters, who are even openly threatening a war of aggression against Greenland because they can't think of anything better than such an idiotic bluff?

GTFO!

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Cool, it's meant for magical potions, right? The friends you got the bottle from must be powerful wizards or witches...

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

The man owes his entire career to cronyism with the business world, especially his close ties to US corporations. Since he is much more of a US business lobbyist than a politician, his neo-capitalist drivel is self-explanatory.

Friedrich Merz (born November 11, 1955, in Brilon), the tenth Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany since May 6, 2025, has been the federal chairman of the CDU since 2022. A former business lawyer and long-time top lobbyist, he has held leading positions in a number of companies and business-related interest groups and networks. [1] Until the end of 2021, Merz was vice president of the CDU's business lobby group, the Economic Council, and a guest member of the presidium of the Small and Medium-Sized Business and Economic Union (MIT). In 2022, the MIT welcomed Merz's election as CDU chairman and stated that he was the first chairman to be a member of the MIT.[4] Armin Peter, most recently deputy press spokesman for the Economic Council and press spokesman for the then Economic Council Vice President Merz, has been deputy spokesman for the CDU and personal press spokesman for Merz since February 2022.[5] [6] Merz continues to be a member of the following organizations: Founding member of the New York section of the CDU Economic Council,[7] lobby organization Society for the Study of Structural Policy Issues,[8] Ludwig Erhard Foundation network, which brings together lobbyists and top politicians. Merz worked as senior counsel for the law firm Mayer Brown LLP until the end of 2021; prior to that, he was a partner for nine years.[9] During his time at Mayer Brown, he advised clients on corporate law, M&A transactions, compliance, and banking and finance law. According to research by CORRECTIV, he represented BASF as a lawyer on several occasions in 2010 and 2011. [10] He was a member of the board of directors at BASF Antwerp for almost a decade, where he headed the "Paints & Pigments" division of the BASF Group. From 2009 to 2019, Merz was chairman of Atlantik-Brücke [11] and from 2016 to 2020, he was chairman of the supervisory board of the German branch of asset manager BlackRock, for which he mediated relationships with important clients, authorities, and government agencies in Germany. [12] He was active in the Market Economy Foundation as a member of the Political Advisory Board of the Tax Code Commission. [13] In connection with his candidacy for the CDU party chairmanship, Merz ended his role as chairman of the supervisory board of Blackrock at the end of the first quarter of 2020.[14][15] At the 2021 CDU party conference, he lost a digital runoff election to his rival Armin Laschet. At the party conference on January 22, 2022, he was elected chairman of the CDU with 94.62% of the delegates' votes. [16] On September 23, 2024, Merz was officially nominated as the CDU and CSU's candidate for chancellor in the next federal election. [17]

Translated from German | Source with references

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Don't forget Clarence Thomas. He was also heavily involved at the time, in fact he played a decisive role, and he is just as obviously corrupt today as he was then. No consequences, no accountability whatsoever.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's truly open mob rule in the States ... a superpower under the control of serious criminals. What do you call that, actually?

I mean, organized crime probably hasn't existed in at least fifty years with such blatant, unpunished audacity and probably not with such an outrageous level of twisted depravity either. I'm not sure if the monsters of the world have ever been so powerful since the end of World War II.

So what would be a fitting term for today's US?

Super-oligarchy? Orange Mega-MAGA-Mafia-Nation?

594
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
263
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

This is a Nazi's wet dream, because they have always been enemies of thought, and now they have a machine that eloquently sells their animalistic ideas.

46

I don't mean those who are paid to do so -their motivation is obvious. I mean people who are destructive out of their own motivation and represent untenable points of view. Are they really serious about this?What's the point?

I mean, it can't all be the propaganda machine. What would be the point of trying that with Lemmy, who is paid for it? With LLMs, I can still understand that it could be done very economically, but even here there are real people who do it. Why? How did they come up with that? What is the goal? What drives them to do it?

I don't get that at all.

46
38

Should such a clause not be added as standard today, similar to the "salvatory clause," provided that the content is not intended for the widest possible distribution?

59
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Here are just a few examples from Europe:

  • Milka | Mondelez
  • Toblerone | Mondelez
  • Philadelphia | Mondelez
  • LU cookies | Mondelez
  • Pampers | Procter & Gamble
  • Ariel, Tide | Procter & Gamble
  • Oral-B | Procter & Gamble
  • Gillette | Procter & Gamble
  • Head & Shoulders | Procter & Gamble
  • Colgate| Colgate‑Palmolive Company
  • Lay’s | PepsiCo
186
82
73
96
52
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/deutschland@feddit.org

Vielleicht helfen solche Petitionen unseren Politikern ja dabei, ihre verantwortungslose Social-Media-Strategie zu überdenken, wenn das Volk sie explizit darauf hinweist, wie absurd es ist, dass sie Accounts auf einer rechtsextremen Propaganda-Plattform betreiben. 12.000 Bürger sind es immerhin schon.

Vielleicht hilft es ja auch, der Politik in Erinnerung zu rufen, dass sie dieses Elend selbst verursacht haben und es weiter aktiv unterstützen, indem sie Monopole fördern anstatt sie zu bekämpfen.

Vielleicht hilft es ihnen ja dabei, das Fediverse zu entdecken.

Nichts davon ist wahrscheinlich, aber einen Versuch scheint es wert.

21
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

What is sold as culture today is just that: a product; a derivative of humanity, sold by the world's most successful companies as a hollow substitute, but one that sells like hotcakes.

view more: next ›

DandomRude

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago