1
1
submitted 1 minute ago by EatingOnions@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org
2
48
submitted 2 hours ago by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/europe@feddit.org
3
24
submitted 2 hours ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org
4
63
5
28
submitted 4 hours ago by Beep@feddit.online to c/europe@feddit.org
6
46

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/71366855

I won the Pulitzer Prize for History for Lords of Finance, my account of how four central bankers’ decisions triggered the Great Depression. I have just completed 1873, a book on America’s railroad boom of the 1870s — the last time private capital flooded into a transformative new infrastructure technology at a scale comparable to 2%–3% of GDP. That research is why, when I look at the AI buildout today, I am genuinely frightened.

I posted this because I think the AI bubble bursting would significantly affect Europe, too (as well as the current lack of indepence in AI adoption).

7
49
submitted 7 hours ago by excel24@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
8
30
submitted 8 hours ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/europe@feddit.org

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/67007011

9
40
submitted 9 hours ago by Pip@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
10
104
submitted 14 hours ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/europe@feddit.org

cross-posted from : https://sopuli.xyz/post/47902491

Daniel Berntsson, founder of Mullvad, gave a personal donation of 5 million SEK (roughly 450,000€) in 2025 to Örebropartiet. This enormous donation accounted for 72% of the party’s revenue in 2025.

How does this affect Mullvad’s legitimacy as a company advocating for a free and open internet, while also funding a political party whose agenda seem to contradict these values? The official party website (in Swedish) can be found via the link below.

https://orebropartiet.se/om-oss/

11
19
submitted 13 hours ago by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/europe@feddit.org
12
19
submitted 18 hours ago by Pip@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
13
41
submitted 22 hours ago by dumnezero@piefed.social to c/europe@feddit.org

Abstract: Previous attribution studies of heat-related excess mortality have given limited attention to temporal trends in vulnerability and their non-climatic drivers. Here, we address this gap by combining counterfactual temperature data derived from multidecadal reanalysis series with time-varying warm-season temperature-mortality associations for the 15 most populous cities in Germany over 1993-2022. We find that declining vulnerability, associated with improvements in life expectancy, has led to decreasing trends in heat-related excess mortality in most cities despite summer warming. In contrast, if life expectancies had not improved, climate change would have induced increasing trends in the heat-related death burden. The growing anthropogenic fingerprint also emerges in the relative proportion of heat-related excess mortality attributable to climate change, which increased by 5.6% per decade (95% confidence interval: 2.6%, 8.6%), averaging 53.6 % (49.8%, 58.9%) across the study period. Our results underline the importance of accounting for evolving vulnerability when attributing human health outcomes to climate change.


Conclusion paragraph:

our study suggests that declining risks of heat-related mortality in the 15 most populous cities of Germany, associated with improvements in life expectancies, have so far overcompensated the increased heat exposure due to climate change. As a result, temporal trends in heat-related excess mortality were negative from 1993 to 2022. However, given the intense regional warming expected under current greenhouse gas emission trajectories, the trend may flip sign in the coming years. Strong efforts in adaptation, such as through heat-health action plans, urban greening, and the expansion of residential air conditioning, might lower the heat vulnerability of the population to keep up with the pace of increasing temperatures, which ultimately will depend on the stringency of mitigation undertaken.

14
35
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/europe@feddit.org
15
89
submitted 1 day ago by Potato@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
16
43
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by roserose56@lemmy.zip to c/europe@feddit.org
17
19
submitted 21 hours ago by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/europe@feddit.org
18
41
submitted 1 day ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org
19
188
submitted 1 day ago by EngineX@lemmy.zip to c/europe@feddit.org
20
35
submitted 1 day ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org
21
52
submitted 1 day ago by Pip@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
22
31
23
55
submitted 1 day ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org

The only non paywalled link I could find I'm not allowed to post here, but it might be interesting to know that it ends in G7iN5 after the domain name.

24
13

Volkswagen could secure jobs in Germany if it produced auto models there that it currently develops in China, the ​premier of the German state of Lower Saxony, a ‌major shareholder, was quoted as saying.

25
8
submitted 23 hours ago by Pip@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
view more: next ›

Europe

11445 readers
1342 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS