I think the U.S. will decline much more quickly. The Orange Guy has been in office for barely more than a year and a half, again—the damage he’s done this time around is pretty much irreparable.

Does it make a difference?

Injustice remains injustice, even if those in power declare it to be just. However, if they ignore the law and no one holds them accountable, there can be no hope for improvement, because that is only possible in a state where the law no longer matters.

What interests me is when this happened. It was apparently a gradual transition, unlike in Nazi Germany, where the law was explicitly changed to justify inhumanity.

The U.S. Nazis thus seem to be pursuing a different strategy to seize absolute power—a strategy that U.S. citizens are evidently enabling them to carry out because what they do is blatantly illegal, but the law is not enforced.

I can’t understand how you can still believe you’re living in a functioning constitutional state.

Everything you say is completely refuted by the Epstein case alone.

I can’t understand how anyone can be so blind.

As I said, in Germany, massive violence was necessary to bring about Nazi rule.

In the U.S., that doesn’t even seem to be necessary, because its citizens apparently view blatant injustice as the norm.

The point at which the U.S. legal system endorses absolute injustice has long since been reached. Even the Supreme Court agrees.

It was a very specific question. You’re the one turning it into an abstraction.

I can give a very specific answer to that, since I’m from Germany: In Germany in 1933, the Nazis used the legal system to give their inhuman crimes a veneer of legality. The reason for this was their absolute and extremely violent seizure of political power. They even retroactively legalized murders—including those of their own henchmen, such as Ernst Röhm, and many of their own party members.

Millions upon millions were murdered by the Nazis—and all of this was sanctioned by the legal system of that monstrous state.

This did not end until 1945 with the Allies’ victory over Nazi Germany.

However, a victory was evidently not achieved, for today in Israel and the U.S., hundreds of thousands of people are being held in concentration camps that are hardly any different from those of the Nazis.

If you think there’s something cryptic about this, it explains to me how what’s happening in the U.S. is possible.

I’m from Germany, the country where the Nazis ruled from 1933 to 1945. Everything they did was, at least in hindsight, covered by the law.

The difference from the U.S. today, however, is that the Nazis in Germany were only able to put their degenerate ideology into practice after they seized absolute power. They didn’t do that until 1933—and even then, they maintained the appearance of legality and enshrined their inhuman ideology in law.

The U.S., however, claims to be a democracy, a constitutional state, and yet it is detaining tens of thousands of people—just as the Nazis were only able to do once they had murdered hundreds of thousands of their political opponents.

That is what my question refers to.

To put it another way: When will U.S. citizens realize that their legal system primarily serves to oppress them?

The quote you've taken from this article could hardly be more inappropriate, since it bears no resemblance to reality—in either version.

That was a long time ago—here in Germany, it was 1933 when Hitler enacted the so-called Enabling Act.

Nazi Germany was defeated in World War II, but U.S. billionaires made sure that their counterparts were never held accountable for their crimes.

That is why, in light of recent events, I ask

They still aren't doing that, quite the opposite, in fact, which shows who's really running the U.S. and what a farce this so called democracy is—the very democracy they supposedly always defend around the world. For example, in Israel, which also had the very best connections to Epstein, as evidenced even by the little information that the so-called U.S. law enforcement agencies are willing to disclose.

That's absolutely right; the only problem is that those chief-idiot are so rich that they control most of what the Internet means to the vast majority of people.

That's just how people are, unfortunately, as evidenced by the fact that platforms like Twitter or Reddit, for example, are still used by the masses.

You could actually list every billionaire in the world. It’s simply impossible to become that absurdly rich without getting involved in these schemes. They all know each other and would never allow anyone who was even remotely decent to rise to their level.

Absolutely, and they are undoubtedly one of the key players responsible for the global resurgence of fascism—for example, in the form of the current U.S. regime, but at the same time also in other countries, first and foremost Israel, but also in Europe, and in every remaining democracy. Their unlimited resources make this possible, and they want more and more.

As I said: These are humanity’s worst enemies.

The Walton family is certainly one of humanity's greatest enemies.