That is simply wrong. Public pressure can certainly be effective. In any case, it's definitely better than doing nothing at all.
They obviously don't want to say what might be part of such an agreement.
Well, if that were the case, companies wouldn't insist on NDAs, would they?
I also don't quite understand how you came to the conclusion that NDAs have nothing to do with the fact that any kind of legal dispute in the U.S. costs a lot of money.
Just to be clear: I am fully aware that NDAs can certainly serve a legitimate purpose when it comes to protecting trade secrets, which can of course be necessary and sensible. In practice, however, they are unfortunately all too often used to hide illegitimate activities from the public, as this post here demonstrates quite impressively. It is simply absurd that elected officials can sign an NDA and then, citing it, withhold information from the public about an obvious conflict of interest.
Yes, in theory. However, under the U.S. legal system, very few people will risk being sued for an alleged breach of an NDA, since it involves a civil lawsuit that can result in astronomical legal costs—potentially even if you were to win the case.
So, in most cases, the mere threat of financial ruin—which can very easily result from the exorbitant legal fees—is enough.
And so, under the guise of protecting trade secrets, companies conveniently shield themselves from the disclosure of all kinds of misconduct.
I think non-disclosure agreements and the existence of billionaires are mutually dependent.
Wer noch nicht unterschrieben hat, sollte es tun, um unseren lieben Herren Politikern mitzuteilen, dass wir kein Interesse an eine Oligarchie à la Russland oder US haben - Petition: "SPD, stoppt den Frontalangriff auf die Informationsfreiheit!"
I'm curious to see if our esteemed Federal Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, has anything to say about this. Well, actually not, because he's more of a U.S. lobbyist than a representative of the people, and so he certainly won't level any criticism at his employers.
No wonder the U.S., together with the butchers from Israel, is deliberately bombing schools.
What a despicable rogue state, led by the most deranged monsters humanity has to offer—so monstrous that not a trace of humanity remains.
That makes it pretty clear that most executives are the worst possible people to run a company. Well, that’s just how it is when ruthlessness and greed are the only criteria used to select top executives.
But hey, even if they were to lose their jobs because they’re burning through so much money, things will go on as usual: Anyone who’s ever held a top management position will always be hired for the same role somewhere else, because competence is definitely not the deciding factor here. Never was, never will be.
DandomRude
0 post score0 comment score
The comparison is a natural one, because of their overt Nazi ideology. In and of itself, however, ICE is comparable to any secret police force—every autocracy has its own unit that makes dissidents disappear and spreads fear and terror among the population. That's just the way it is.