Artist: John Sharman

Year: ca. 1918

Medium: Oil on canvas

This composition is an intricate network of trellis, railing, and awning. Upon this framework Sharman lavished broad strokes of brilliant color, applied with the sensitivity to light and shade that he acquired from the Impressionist practice of painting outdoors. This technique created a portrait of summer sun that casts deep shadows on the porch and transforms vines into a wave of white blossoms. Although not well known today, Sharman received many excellent reviews in his day, especially in his native Boston. A critic for the Boston Transcript described At the End of the Porch as “a beautiful, luminous and joyous picture of a place where one would like to be.”

Source

Image Source

At the End of the Porch by John Sharman, ca. 1918, an oil painting of a sunlit porch with trellis, railing, awning, deep shadows, and vines covered in white blossoms.
[–] 1 point 2 days ago

What I meant by that was that many tech companies hire people, who frequently perform these tasks on a project basis for only short periods of time, and pay them a pittance for their work. Their numbers are likely to fluctuate greatly.

I was by no means trying to emphasise the fact that these people mostly live in countries where wages are particularly low and where there are virtually no labor protections; I was simply pointing out that they are usually hired on a short-term basis.

This exploitative practice, as well as other "gig-work" arrangements, is unfortunately quite widespread, especially in the tech industry, and serves to increase corporate profitability. Many tech companies use this approach to reduce the number of permanent employees—a practice that, of course, isn’t unique to the tech industry—but using these practices there are many tech companies that generate astronomical revenues with a comparatively small workforce.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

    I don't understand what you're getting at. Of course tech companies have a lot of employees if you count all the "mechanical turks". That's simply misleading.

    None of that has much to do with what my original comment was about.

    You’re saying that it’s impossible for powerful, completely degenerate people to be capable of playing their power games.

    My take on this is that a look at the history books proves you wrong. LinkedIn-style fairy tales about leadership and all that bogus doesn't change much about that.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Because they have the money to do so. Those who have it simply pay good people. You should know this if you’ve ever dealt with large companies. It doesn’t take good management—just the money to pay the people who do the work. You should also know that giant online corporations like Meta have an incredibly small number of employees compared to industrial companies, and labor is the biggest cost factor in any business.

    What do you actually do for a living? You claim to have insights. Where did you get them?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    I’d be an idiot to say here what I do for a living, but yes, I regularly deal with CEOs -and it’s precisely this experience that makes it all the more likely to me that a conspiracy like the one mentioned above is underway. While I’m nowhere near that level, I’m still quite familiar with the politics in companies with 500 or more employees. For me, this is all the more reason to entertain such thoughts, because I know of hardly any company where performance or competence is even remotely appreciated. The people I know as “the decision-makers” should actually be the very last ones to make decisions—they’re self-absorbed, unscrupulous people.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (11 children)

    This is a conspiracy theory, but is it really so far-fetched to assume that the most powerful 1% of the populations are joining forces worldwide to establish something like a global feudal regime?

    It’s entirely feasible, since we’re talking about just a few thousand people here.

    In any case, these people have one thing in common: they view democracy as a problem. This applies to Trump just as much as it does to Putin and Jinping. The same goes for their henchmen, such as Merz in Germany, for example.

    It’s not that unthinkable when you consider the fundamental idea behind fascism, as shaped by Mussolini in his day: a brotherhood of the elites striving for absolute rule.

    It seems to me that this is now the agenda, especially since in the U.S., with the pseudo-intellectual concept of "Dark Enlightenment," there doesn’t even seem to be any attempt to hide it.

    I'm not usually a fan of such ideas, but it does seem very, very suspicious to me, given that the leaders of the world's most powerful countries are apparently doing everything in their power to undo the civilizational progress of the last hundred years—and are clearly doing so in a fairly well-coordinated manner.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago*

    That really sounds like the same owner. I’m always grateful for whatever food she grants me, especially since it’s always excellent, and I wouldn’t dream of not flushing the toilet—that would undoubtedly lead to the consequences stated on the sign; that’s as certain as death and taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 75 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    There's a Laotian restaurant right around the corner from me that serves really delicious food. The owner is an elderly lady who's so amazingly unfriendly that it's actually funny.

    In the men's restroom, there's a sign hanging above the urinals that reads: "Flush, or else ✂️"

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    Is there anything in the UK after Brexit that is similar to the GDPR? While it does little to protect EU citizens from the influence of corrupt politicians, it is at least a law on the books that stands in the way of the neo-fascists’ diabolical schemes. Is there anything comparable in the UK?

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

    Schon bitter, wenn sich der Kanzler direkt nach Landtagswahlen vor die Kamera stellen muss, nur um Rücktrittsforderungen vorzugreifen.

    Glaube kaum, dass diese "Ich-sitze-fest-im-Sattel"-Show auch nur die Leute in den eigenen Reihen irgendwie beeindruckt. Wüsste nicht, wie man hier etwas anderes denken kann als: mal wieder ziemlich peinlich, Fritze!

  • source
  •  

    Artist: Akseli Gallen-Kallela

    Year: 1886

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    Painted in 1886, View from Eläintarha at Sunset by Akseli Gallen-Kallela captures a quiet landscape at the end of the day. The water mirrors the soft pink and orange hues of the sky, while the surrounding trees and land appear in deeper shades of green and brown. Loose, noticeable brushwork gives the scene a textured surface and adds to its calm, reflective mood. The painting is held by the Ateneum art museum in Helsinki, Finland, and measures 31 cm (12.2 in) by 24.5 cm (9.6 in).

    Image Source

    Akseli Gallen-Kallela’s View from Eläintarha at Sunset (1886) shows a calm body of water reflecting a pink and orange evening sky, with dark trees and shoreline in the foreground. Visible brushstrokes create a textured, impressionistic effect.
     

    Artist: Caspar David Friedrich

    Year: 1809–10

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    The Abbey in the Oakwood (German: Abtei im Eichwald) is an oil painting by the German Romantic artist Caspar David Friedrich. It was painted between 1809 and 1810 in Dresden and was first shown together with the painting The Monk by the Sea in the Prussian Academy of Arts exhibition of 1810. On Friedrich's request The Abbey in the Oakwood was hung beneath The Monk by the Sea. This painting is one of over two dozen of Friedrich's works that include cemeteries or graves. After the exhibition both pictures were bought by King Frederick William III for his collection. Today the paintings hang side by side in the Alte Nationalgalerie, Berlin.

    Source

    Image source with high res download

    Artwork by Caspar David Friedrich: Monks carry a coffin toward a ruined Gothic abbey through a forest, with a fresh grave and faint crosses in the dark foreground.
     

    Artist: Gustave Caillebotte

    Year: 1875

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    Les raboteurs de parquet (English title: The Floor Scrapers) is an oil painting by French Impressionist Gustave Caillebotte. The canvas measures 102 by 146.5 centimetres (40.2 in × 57.7 in). It was originally given by Caillebotte's family in 1894 to the Musée du Luxembourg, then transferred to the Musée du Louvre in 1929. In 1947, it was moved to the Galerie nationale du Jeu de Paume, and in 1986, it was transferred again to the Musée d'Orsay in Paris, where it is currently displayed.

    (...) Despite the effort Caillebotte put into the painting, it was rejected by France's most prestigious art exhibition, the Salon, for the Salon of 1875. The depiction of working-class people in their trade, not fully clothed, shocked the jurors and was deemed a "vulgar subject matter". He was hurt by this rejection, and instead showed it at the second exhibition of the Impressionists, with whom he had already associated himself, in 1876. He presented it alongside some of his other works, including a second, different version of Raboteurs from 1876, and his earlier work Jeune homme à sa fenêtre (Young Man at His Window). The images of the floor scrapers came to be associated with Degas's paintings of washerwomen, also presented at the same exhibition and similarly scorned as "vulgar".

    Source

    Image source with high res download

    Gustave Caillebotte, The Floor Scrapers: Three shirtless workers kneel and scrape a wooden floor inside a Parisian apartment, their tools and muscular backs highlighted by light from the windows.
     

    Artist: Umberto Boccioni

    Year: 1902

    Medium: Gouache, charcoal, and pastel on paper

    Created by Umberto Boccioni in 1902 in Rome, Italy, the artwork titled “Young Man on a Riverbank” is an embodiment of the Impressionism and Realism art movements. As a genre painting, it offers a snapshot of everyday life, capturing a moment that conveys a broader cultural or social understanding.

    The artwork presents a contemplative scene featuring a solitary young man standing on a riverbank. He is portrayed in profile, gazing out over the water. His attire, notably a hat and a long coat, harmonizes with the formality of the early 20th century. The background is dominated by a warm, golden palette, suggesting the presence of either a sunrise or sunset sky filled with soft, billowing clouds. Below, the river reflects the luminous sky, with white streaks of light dancing on the water’s surface to create a serene and reflective atmosphere.

    The shore on the opposite side of the riverbank is lined with dense foliage, and a pier or dock structure extends into the water, where a small boat is moored. These elements give the scene a sense of place and tranquility, characteristic of the Impressionist movement’s pursuit to capture the fleeting effects of light and the Realist movement’s focus on the authentic depiction of ordinary life. The brushwork appears loose and expressive, contributing to the overall impressionistic quality of the painting. The composition invites the viewer to join the young man in his introspection, offering a moment of calm and reflection.

    Source

    Image Source

    Umberto Boccioni’s Young Man on a Riverbank, a painting of a solitary young man in profile wearing a hat and long coat as he gazes across the water. A warm golden sky with soft clouds reflects on the river, while dense foliage, a dock, and a small moored boat line the shore. 
    submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by to c/traditional_art@lemmy.world
     

    Artist: Edward Hopper

    Year: 1925

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    The Bootleggers is a 1925 painting by American realist Edward Hopper. The work generally marks the end of his early period before painting the House by the Railroad that same year, the start of his mature or classic period. The painting depicts a nautical scene in a subdued blue and gray palette, showing three men on board a motorboat staring at the shore where another man, standing besides a large house, stares back at them. It has been described and interpreted as Hopper's most overt, political, and even contrarian work.

    Art historians and critics believe that the painting is loosely based on the history of rum-running during Prohibition (1920–1933). The scene is thought to depict the smuggling of alcohol along the coast of Gloucester, Massachusetts, but Hopper's art dealer made it known that the painting was not based on an actual location but on several different scenes blended together. The Bootleggers was first exhibited in November at the Brooklyn Museum, followed by several other showings. Hopper held on to the painting for almost three decades until the Currier Museum of Art acquired it for their collection in 1956.

    Source

    Image Source with highres download

    Edward Hopper’s The Bootleggers depicts a stark coastal scene at dusk, with a white Victorian house standing isolated against a darkening sky. Three figures sit in a small boat in the foreground, suggesting secrecy or illicit activity. Cool colors and faint light from the house create a quiet, tense, somber mood.
     

    Artist: Juan Gris

    Year: 1917

    Medium: Oil on panel

    Like many European artists before them, Cubists often depicted Harlequin, a stock character in the Italian commedia dell’arte, a form of masked theater dating back to the sixteenth century. Easily recognized in his checkered costume, Harlequin is a trickster with a tendency to act on whim and passion. For this reason, several modern artists adopted the character as an alter ego. Gris was particularly fond of the subject; he portrayed Harlequin in approximately forty works made between 1917 and 1925. In this painting, caricature softens the Cubist fracturing of the figure, while bands of light illuminate Harlequin’s costume.

    Source

    Image Source

    Juan Gris’s cubist painting Harlequin with a Guitar, depicting a fragmented harlequin figure beside a guitar in muted brown, gray, and blue tones.
     

    This explains why this promising technology can’t be put to good use, why there can’t be a compensation model similar to YouTube’s, why it’s called artificial intelligence, and all that.

    It’s an ideological issue, and it’s dominated by those who are used to their work being worth an absurd amount of money per hour— it's promoted by the combined power of all those vultures who have never accomplished even the slightest thing in their lives. It’s the wet dream of Wall Street hedge fund managers and CEOs who keep moving on after they’ve ruined yet another company.

    That’s why it’s so incredibly fitting that the U.S. regime is betting so heavily on LLMs—they’re the prime example of the very actors preventing humanity from benefiting from this technological achievement. They epitomize what happens when egregious incompetence, criminal energy, and utter unscrupulousness are given opportunities and power that they should never have.

    view more: next ›