[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I completely agree. I fear that this global trend is linked to the combined power of mentally ill individuals who have amassed so much power that they are now using their pernicious influence to establish a kind of new, transnational monarchy of billionaires.

I can’t think of any other explanation for the resurgence of inhuman fascism in so many countries at the same time.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Thanks for the tip—I'll check it out.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

It's a shame that even here in the Fediverse, people downvote you just for stating the obvious.

The ideological blindness in the U.S. is apparently so strong that many simply fail to realize that they are the bad guys, that their regime is pure evil.

Even under a degenerate monster like the current U.S. president, many Americans simply cannot see through all the lies being drummed into them by those who have been exploiting them for years on end.

It really seems hopeless....

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Unfortunately, one sees such articles far too rarely in Western media.

Usually, all the atrocities are glossed over in order to somehow give the impression that Israel is a civilized state—even though the ICC has had arrest warrants out for Netanyahu and some of his cronies for ages, and UN bodies have determined that Israel is committing genocide long ago.

All this is still possible solely because the U.S. shields Israel from international condemnation, with many other Western countries aiding and abetting this—including Germany, where I’m from; especially given our history, I am ashamed of our unscrupulous politicians.

This also explains why these unspeakable crimes are not being adequately reported, why they are portrayed as a military conflict when they are, in fact, a barbaric slaughter of defenseless people.

The only positive thing I can see in this coverage is that the atrocity is so obvious that this article even made it into the NYT. That is certainly to the author’s credit, and the concessions he had to make in order for it to be published at all are completely understandable.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I’ll do anything for you, Mr. Bigglesworth.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Lately, a cat from the neighborhood has been stopping by my place a lot. The first thing it usually does is jump up on the counter—I don’t mind that the little guy takes his liberties. I’ve already moved everything out of the way that could be dangerous or break, and I just give it a quick wipe down once he’s had his fill. That way, we have a tacit agreement that the counter is fair game....

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Yes, he will probably never be prosecuted for his crimes. Although Germany is, for the most part, a functioning constitutional state, it is unfortunately still very rare for a politician to be prosecuted for embezzling public funds.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That’s exactly what they are—and they’re almost just as corrupt and just as dishonest. Spahn shamelessly enriched himself during his time in office. The fact that he now has to resign because of this "scandal" is, of course, beyond ridiculous, but hey, at least he has to go.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

No official Israeli response yet.

What’s the point of their comment anyway?

It’s all well and good to follow standard journalistic practices and let both sides have their say—but then it would only be appropriate to actually do that as a matter of course, which is unfortunately not the case at all in the NYT’s coverage of Israel’s crimes, because, objectively speaking, there can be no doubt whatsoever that Israel is committing genocide and is guilty of the most egregious crimes against humanity. An article like this is the absolute exception in U.S. reporting.

To believe that Israeli officials would have anything to contribute on this matter other than the usual lies and threats is pure mockery. You could might as well ask Donald Trump about Epstein...

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

I think the best approach is to find reviewers whose tastes largely align with your own. Their reviews can serve as a good reference when you’re looking for a movie you haven’t seen yet.

There are simply too many criteria you could apply. The "Cinesiasts", for example—who like films like Citizen Kane or works by Ingmar Bergman, Aki Kaurismäki, and the like—naturally know a great deal about their field. However, that by no means means their reviews would be a good reference point for the general public, who simply want to be entertained and don’t place too much value on artistic merit or the most elaborate technical skills of filmmakers.

38
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/deutschland@feddit.org

Am 2. Juli haben die Spitzen von CDU, CSU und SPD beschlossen, das Informationsfreiheitsgesetz (IFG) faktisch abzuschaffen – ein Frontalangriff auf unsere Informationsfreiheit und Demokratie. Dabei versprach die Bundesregierung im Koalitionsvertrag noch das Gegenteil: eine Reform des IFG „mit einem Mehrwert für Bürgerinnen und Bürger". Diesen Angriff müssen wir stoppen. (...)

Link zur Petition

41
Lemmy Shitshow (thelemmy.club)
55

Please go easy on the downvotes—the point here is to try to understand a perspective that many of you probably won't share.

104
64
19

I’m talking about derogatory terms like “nerd,” “geek,” “wise-ass,” and so on, as well as sayings like “nobody likes a smart aleck.”

It seems to me that these terms and expressions are used much more frequently in the business world than derogatory terms like “show-off,” “charlatan,” “fraud,” and so on.

I can’t even think of a commonly used saying for the latter. Only: “Fake it till you make it,” which is really more of a reinforcement of the idea that knowledge isn’t very valuable.

Is it just my impression?

79
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

This illusion is what made the current AI hype possible in the first place, and it is now causing humanity to take steps backward rather than moving forward. Yet AI technology could be used fairly and very effectively if it weren’t marketed exactly as it is: as a machine that supposedly enables everyone to do things they don’t have the slightest clue about.

This is what has made social media so profitable, and it’s also the reason why LLMs aren’t being used the way they should be, but are instead being sold as artificial intelligence to idiots who don’t have the slightest clue about the subject -not about what it takes or how long it takes to write a book, paint a picture, write a scientific article, code a secure application, or whatever.

The profit motive has turned the internet into the opposite of what it should have been, and AI technology has consequently ended up as an instrument of power in the hands of a small number of people who are incredibly narrow-minded but, unfortunately, also incredibly powerful due to their boundless greed.

It is the general public that bears the brunt of this boundless greed.

If things continue this way and we look just a few decades into the future, this is exactly what will spell the end of humanity, since profit is always prioritized over the common good.

148

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47219103

This is the introductory text of a petition from Germany calling on the President of the European Commission to enforce existing law rather than granting exemptions to U.S. tech giants on her own initiative, without consulting the public:

Google is violating Europe’s digital rules. The European Commission had therefore already planned to impose a fine of billions of euros. However, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is said to have blocked the decision at the last minute—apparently out of concern over political pressure from the U.S. This sends a dangerous signal: Europe’s laws must apply even when powerful corporations and governments challenge them. We call on Ursula von der Leyen and the European Commission: Enforce the Digital Markets Act consistently against Google. Defend our democratic rules against the power of the big tech companies.

Introduction to a Petition by Campact (German organization) with more than 70,000 signatures after one week

Please post links to similar petitions from other EU countries in the comments. It is unacceptable for our politicians to unilaterally suspend existing laws in order to sell us out to US corporations. Fight back!

116
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org

This is the introductory text of a petition from Germany calling on the President of the European Commission to enforce existing law rather than granting exemptions to U.S. tech giants on her own initiative, without consulting the public:

Google is violating Europe’s digital rules. The European Commission had therefore already planned to impose a fine of billions of euros. However, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is said to have blocked the decision at the last minute—apparently out of concern over political pressure from the U.S. This sends a dangerous signal: Europe’s laws must apply even when powerful corporations and governments challenge them. We call on Ursula von der Leyen and the European Commission: Enforce the Digital Markets Act consistently against Google. Defend our democratic rules against the power of the big tech companies.

Introduction to a Petition by Campact (German organization) with more than 70,000 signatures after one week

Please post links to similar petitions from other EU countries in the comments. It is unacceptable for our politicians to unilaterally suspend existing laws in order to sell us out to US corporations. Fight back!

19
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/deutschland@feddit.org

Google verstößt gegen Europas Digitalregeln. Die EU-Kommission wollte deshalb bereits eine Milliardenstrafe verhängen. Doch Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen soll die Entscheidung auf den letzten Metern gestoppt haben – offenbar aus Sorge vor politischem Druck aus den USA. Das ist ein gefährliches Signal: Europas Gesetze müssen auch gelten, wenn mächtige Konzerne und Regierungen sie infragestellen. Wir fordern Ursula von der Leyen und die EU-Kommission auf: Setzen Sie den Digital Markets Act konsequent gegen Google durch. Verteidigen Sie unsere demokratischen Regeln gegen die Macht der großen Tech-Konzerne...

18
67
view more: next ›

DandomRude

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago