[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

The comparison is a natural one, because of their overt Nazi ideology. In and of itself, however, ICE is comparable to any secret police force—every autocracy has its own unit that makes dissidents disappear and spreads fear and terror among the population. That's just the way it is.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

That is simply wrong. Public pressure can certainly be effective. In any case, it's definitely better than doing nothing at all.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They obviously don't want to say what might be part of such an agreement.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Well, if that were the case, companies wouldn't insist on NDAs, would they?

I also don't quite understand how you came to the conclusion that NDAs have nothing to do with the fact that any kind of legal dispute in the U.S. costs a lot of money.

Just to be clear: I am fully aware that NDAs can certainly serve a legitimate purpose when it comes to protecting trade secrets, which can of course be necessary and sensible. In practice, however, they are unfortunately all too often used to hide illegitimate activities from the public, as this post here demonstrates quite impressively. It is simply absurd that elected officials can sign an NDA and then, citing it, withhold information from the public about an obvious conflict of interest.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, in theory. However, under the U.S. legal system, very few people will risk being sued for an alleged breach of an NDA, since it involves a civil lawsuit that can result in astronomical legal costs—potentially even if you were to win the case.

So, in most cases, the mere threat of financial ruin—which can very easily result from the exorbitant legal fees—is enough.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

And so, under the guise of protecting trade secrets, companies conveniently shield themselves from the disclosure of all kinds of misconduct.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

I think non-disclosure agreements and the existence of billionaires are mutually dependent.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Wer noch nicht unterschrieben hat, sollte es tun, um unseren lieben Herren Politikern mitzuteilen, dass wir kein Interesse an eine Oligarchie à la Russland oder US haben - Petition: "SPD, stoppt den Frontalangriff auf die Informationsfreiheit!"

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm curious to see if our esteemed Federal Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, has anything to say about this. Well, actually not, because he's more of a U.S. lobbyist than a representative of the people, and so he certainly won't level any criticism at his employers.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

No wonder the U.S., together with the butchers from Israel, is deliberately bombing schools.

What a despicable rogue state, led by the most deranged monsters humanity has to offer—so monstrous that not a trace of humanity remains.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That makes it pretty clear that most executives are the worst possible people to run a company. Well, that’s just how it is when ruthlessness and greed are the only criteria used to select top executives.

But hey, even if they were to lose their jobs because they’re burning through so much money, things will go on as usual: Anyone who’s ever held a top management position will always be hired for the same role somewhere else, because competence is definitely not the deciding factor here. Never was, never will be.

36
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/deutschland@feddit.org

Am 2. Juli haben die Spitzen von CDU, CSU und SPD beschlossen, das Informationsfreiheitsgesetz (IFG) faktisch abzuschaffen – ein Frontalangriff auf unsere Informationsfreiheit und Demokratie. Dabei versprach die Bundesregierung im Koalitionsvertrag noch das Gegenteil: eine Reform des IFG „mit einem Mehrwert für Bürgerinnen und Bürger". Diesen Angriff müssen wir stoppen. (...)

Link zur Petition

42
Lemmy Shitshow (thelemmy.club)
55

Please go easy on the downvotes—the point here is to try to understand a perspective that many of you probably won't share.

104
64
19

I’m talking about derogatory terms like “nerd,” “geek,” “wise-ass,” and so on, as well as sayings like “nobody likes a smart aleck.”

It seems to me that these terms and expressions are used much more frequently in the business world than derogatory terms like “show-off,” “charlatan,” “fraud,” and so on.

I can’t even think of a commonly used saying for the latter. Only: “Fake it till you make it,” which is really more of a reinforcement of the idea that knowledge isn’t very valuable.

Is it just my impression?

79
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

This illusion is what made the current AI hype possible in the first place, and it is now causing humanity to take steps backward rather than moving forward. Yet AI technology could be used fairly and very effectively if it weren’t marketed exactly as it is: as a machine that supposedly enables everyone to do things they don’t have the slightest clue about.

This is what has made social media so profitable, and it’s also the reason why LLMs aren’t being used the way they should be, but are instead being sold as artificial intelligence to idiots who don’t have the slightest clue about the subject -not about what it takes or how long it takes to write a book, paint a picture, write a scientific article, code a secure application, or whatever.

The profit motive has turned the internet into the opposite of what it should have been, and AI technology has consequently ended up as an instrument of power in the hands of a small number of people who are incredibly narrow-minded but, unfortunately, also incredibly powerful due to their boundless greed.

It is the general public that bears the brunt of this boundless greed.

If things continue this way and we look just a few decades into the future, this is exactly what will spell the end of humanity, since profit is always prioritized over the common good.

148

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47219103

This is the introductory text of a petition from Germany calling on the President of the European Commission to enforce existing law rather than granting exemptions to U.S. tech giants on her own initiative, without consulting the public:

Google is violating Europe’s digital rules. The European Commission had therefore already planned to impose a fine of billions of euros. However, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is said to have blocked the decision at the last minute—apparently out of concern over political pressure from the U.S. This sends a dangerous signal: Europe’s laws must apply even when powerful corporations and governments challenge them. We call on Ursula von der Leyen and the European Commission: Enforce the Digital Markets Act consistently against Google. Defend our democratic rules against the power of the big tech companies.

Introduction to a Petition by Campact (German organization) with more than 70,000 signatures after one week

Please post links to similar petitions from other EU countries in the comments. It is unacceptable for our politicians to unilaterally suspend existing laws in order to sell us out to US corporations. Fight back!

116
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org

This is the introductory text of a petition from Germany calling on the President of the European Commission to enforce existing law rather than granting exemptions to U.S. tech giants on her own initiative, without consulting the public:

Google is violating Europe’s digital rules. The European Commission had therefore already planned to impose a fine of billions of euros. However, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is said to have blocked the decision at the last minute—apparently out of concern over political pressure from the U.S. This sends a dangerous signal: Europe’s laws must apply even when powerful corporations and governments challenge them. We call on Ursula von der Leyen and the European Commission: Enforce the Digital Markets Act consistently against Google. Defend our democratic rules against the power of the big tech companies.

Introduction to a Petition by Campact (German organization) with more than 70,000 signatures after one week

Please post links to similar petitions from other EU countries in the comments. It is unacceptable for our politicians to unilaterally suspend existing laws in order to sell us out to US corporations. Fight back!

19
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DandomRude@lemmy.world to c/deutschland@feddit.org

Google verstößt gegen Europas Digitalregeln. Die EU-Kommission wollte deshalb bereits eine Milliardenstrafe verhängen. Doch Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen soll die Entscheidung auf den letzten Metern gestoppt haben – offenbar aus Sorge vor politischem Druck aus den USA. Das ist ein gefährliches Signal: Europas Gesetze müssen auch gelten, wenn mächtige Konzerne und Regierungen sie infragestellen. Wir fordern Ursula von der Leyen und die EU-Kommission auf: Setzen Sie den Digital Markets Act konsequent gegen Google durch. Verteidigen Sie unsere demokratischen Regeln gegen die Macht der großen Tech-Konzerne...

18
67
view more: next ›

DandomRude

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago