Artist: Richard Estes

Year: 1971

Medium: Oil on Canvas

Richard Estes describes himself as a realist painter although he is more often described as a Photorealist. In fact, he is regarded as one of the founders of the Photorealist movement which emerged in America in the late 1960s. His paintings, in reproduction at least, may remind us of photography, and Estes has always used the camera to collect and record information from which he can paint, but he has never been concerned with copying the appearance of a photograph. Unlike many Photorealists, Estes is not interested in making paintings which show how the camera records information. He avoids painting areas of photographic focus and blur. Photography enables him to capture a moment in all its complexities and has resulted in a remarkably intricate representation of refracted light. However, because a photograph is limited by mechanics of exposure, focus and a single fixed lens, Estes compensates by painting from an assemblage of many photographs. Taken by himself, on location, what Estes' paintings share with photography is an authenticity. As with photography, we regard Estes' paintings to be a truthful representation of reality. But, on examination, it is clear that the means by which Estes represents the world is very different from photography. Estes, for example, introduces directional mark making to reveal form, in contrast to the homogenous flatness of the photograph, and makes substantial alterations to the construction of illusionistic space. The truth in an Estes painting is very different from that of the truth of a photograph. Ultimately, it is authentic not to the reality of our world, but the world created by the individual painter. As a realist, Estes utilises the particularities of the world around him to extend and develop his own artistic vision, and in so doing, orientates himself within a long tradition of painters such as Vermeer, Bellotto, Eakins, Hopper and Sheeler, all of whom he admires.

People's Flowers is early, pivotal, well known and one of Richard Estes' very best and most important paintings. The clarity, colour, subject matter and composition indicate a totally mature and fully developed Estes, leader of the Photorealist Movement at a point in time when all but a few of the other artists were still struggling to perfect their visions and styles.

First, it is interesting to note that there are only five major Estes paintings with a vertical format (over four feet, or 125 cm, high). This was not a favoured format for the artist. However, the composition is innovative and flawlessly conceived. The concentric rectangles of the buildings and window frame bring the eye to the central focus point, the neon sign People' s Flowers. The line of trucks and the outdoor plants point to the sign as well. The sky in the reflection on the window also does the same thing. The descending width of the mirrored sign and the awning sign also bring the eye to the centre of the painting. The clarity of the reflection and the contrast of the primary-coloured red brick above the secondary-coloured green below are striking visual effects. Artists try forever to create this kind of eye-arresting imagery. It is the domain of the Photorealist, however, to discover and recognise this vision in the world around him, and then to capture it with the camera and recreate it with brush and paint.

You who view this painting can and will begin to realise how to "look" and "see" and will be aware of the world you exist in in a new way.

Louis K. Meisel Source

Image Source

Richard Estes’s 1971 photorealist oil painting People’s Flowers: a storefront window reflects a blue sky and surrounding buildings, while red brick above contrasts with green lower panels. Concentric architectural lines, trucks, potted plants, and repeated signs direct attention to the central neon “People’s Flowers” sign.
[–] [S] 3 points 17 hours ago

I can definitely imagine that. I’m not particularly knowledgeable about the subject, but I think he was probably quite amused by the pseudo-intellectual ramblings the art world came up with when discussing his works in the culture sections or elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 14 points 1 day ago* (6 children)

    Yeah, that was totally Magritte's thing. He painted a lot of clever—and also pretty strange—pictures. A surrealist through and through, and even one of the best-known representatives of the movement. He was particularly recognized for placing familiar objects in unusual and unexpected settings.

    If you like that kind of art and happen to be in the area, I highly recommend the Dalí Theater-Museum in Figueres (Spain)—it's pretty trippy.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Artist: René Magritte

    Year: 1965

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    The Blank Signature (Le blanc-Seing) is a 1965 painting by the Belgian surrealist painter René Magritte. The work is part of the collection of the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. It was one of Magritte’s last works before his death in 1967. The painting depicts a woman on horseback riding through a forest. Due to an optical illusion employed by the artist, the image is partially fragmented, although at first glance the viewer may perceive it as a coherent whole. The woman and the horse are simultaneously in front of, between, and behind the trees. Her right arm is partially hidden behind a tree that, upon closer inspection, is located in the background. One possible interpretation is that the merging of the forest with the horsewoman suggests a unity of humanity and nature. But as is usually the case with Magritte, the work primarily raises questions, a sense further heightened by the enigmatic title. The painter himself believed that his works required no specific interpretation; every viewer can interpret the work in their own way. He also noted that art critics sometimes saw more—or something entirely different—in his works than he himself had consciously intended.

    Source (translated)

    Image Source

    René Magritte’s Le Blanc-Seing (The Blank Signature, 1965): A woman in a mauve-pink dress and matching cap rides a reddish-brown horse through a green forest. Tall, slender tree trunks appear in front of and behind the horse and rider, intermittently obscuring their bodies and creating an illusion of shifting depth. Dappled green foliage fills the background, while short green and brown strokes suggest grass over a golden-tan ground.
    [–] 3 points 4 days ago

    I'm not entirely sure if I'm fully compatible, but hey, I've even got some new features now, even though some of the popular old ones have been partially superseded – so maybe there are still some legitimate use cases for "Legacy Me" after all :)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 31 points 5 days ago* (2 children)

    I had a lot of security flaws and vulnerabilities that were patched over time. I can't understand why people are still running such old versions of me - it's grossly negligent.

  • source
  •  

    Artist: John Sharman

    Year: ca. 1918

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    This composition is an intricate network of trellis, railing, and awning. Upon this framework Sharman lavished broad strokes of brilliant color, applied with the sensitivity to light and shade that he acquired from the Impressionist practice of painting outdoors. This technique created a portrait of summer sun that casts deep shadows on the porch and transforms vines into a wave of white blossoms. Although not well known today, Sharman received many excellent reviews in his day, especially in his native Boston. A critic for the Boston Transcript described At the End of the Porch as “a beautiful, luminous and joyous picture of a place where one would like to be.”

    Source

    Image Source

    At the End of the Porch by John Sharman, ca. 1918, an oil painting of a sunlit porch with trellis, railing, awning, deep shadows, and vines covered in white blossoms.
    [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    What I meant by that was that many tech companies hire people, who frequently perform these tasks on a project basis for only short periods of time, and pay them a pittance for their work. Their numbers are likely to fluctuate greatly.

    I was by no means trying to emphasise the fact that these people mostly live in countries where wages are particularly low and where there are virtually no labor protections; I was simply pointing out that they are usually hired on a short-term basis.

    This exploitative practice, as well as other "gig-work" arrangements, is unfortunately quite widespread, especially in the tech industry, and serves to increase corporate profitability. Many tech companies use this approach to reduce the number of permanent employees—a practice that, of course, isn’t unique to the tech industry—but using these practices there are many tech companies that generate astronomical revenues with a comparatively small workforce.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

    I don't understand what you're getting at. Of course tech companies have a lot of employees if you count all the "mechanical turks". That's simply misleading.

    None of that has much to do with what my original comment was about.

    You’re saying that it’s impossible for powerful, completely degenerate people to be capable of playing their power games.

    My take on this is that a look at the history books proves you wrong. LinkedIn-style fairy tales about leadership and all that bogus doesn't change much about that.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Because they have the money to do so. Those who have it simply pay good people. You should know this if you’ve ever dealt with large companies. It doesn’t take good management—just the money to pay the people who do the work. You should also know that giant online corporations like Meta have an incredibly small number of employees compared to industrial companies, and labor is the biggest cost factor in any business.

    What do you actually do for a living? You claim to have insights. Where did you get them?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    I’d be an idiot to say here what I do for a living, but yes, I regularly deal with CEOs -and it’s precisely this experience that makes it all the more likely to me that a conspiracy like the one mentioned above is underway. While I’m nowhere near that level, I’m still quite familiar with the politics in companies with 500 or more employees. For me, this is all the more reason to entertain such thoughts, because I know of hardly any company where performance or competence is even remotely appreciated. The people I know as “the decision-makers” should actually be the very last ones to make decisions—they’re self-absorbed, unscrupulous people.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Artist: Akseli Gallen-Kallela

    Year: 1886

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    Painted in 1886, View from Eläintarha at Sunset by Akseli Gallen-Kallela captures a quiet landscape at the end of the day. The water mirrors the soft pink and orange hues of the sky, while the surrounding trees and land appear in deeper shades of green and brown. Loose, noticeable brushwork gives the scene a textured surface and adds to its calm, reflective mood. The painting is held by the Ateneum art museum in Helsinki, Finland, and measures 31 cm (12.2 in) by 24.5 cm (9.6 in).

    Image Source

    Akseli Gallen-Kallela’s View from Eläintarha at Sunset (1886) shows a calm body of water reflecting a pink and orange evening sky, with dark trees and shoreline in the foreground. Visible brushstrokes create a textured, impressionistic effect.
     

    Artist: Caspar David Friedrich

    Year: 1809–10

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    The Abbey in the Oakwood (German: Abtei im Eichwald) is an oil painting by the German Romantic artist Caspar David Friedrich. It was painted between 1809 and 1810 in Dresden and was first shown together with the painting The Monk by the Sea in the Prussian Academy of Arts exhibition of 1810. On Friedrich's request The Abbey in the Oakwood was hung beneath The Monk by the Sea. This painting is one of over two dozen of Friedrich's works that include cemeteries or graves. After the exhibition both pictures were bought by King Frederick William III for his collection. Today the paintings hang side by side in the Alte Nationalgalerie, Berlin.

    Source

    Image source with high res download

    Artwork by Caspar David Friedrich: Monks carry a coffin toward a ruined Gothic abbey through a forest, with a fresh grave and faint crosses in the dark foreground.
     

    Artist: Gustave Caillebotte

    Year: 1875

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    Les raboteurs de parquet (English title: The Floor Scrapers) is an oil painting by French Impressionist Gustave Caillebotte. The canvas measures 102 by 146.5 centimetres (40.2 in × 57.7 in). It was originally given by Caillebotte's family in 1894 to the Musée du Luxembourg, then transferred to the Musée du Louvre in 1929. In 1947, it was moved to the Galerie nationale du Jeu de Paume, and in 1986, it was transferred again to the Musée d'Orsay in Paris, where it is currently displayed.

    (...) Despite the effort Caillebotte put into the painting, it was rejected by France's most prestigious art exhibition, the Salon, for the Salon of 1875. The depiction of working-class people in their trade, not fully clothed, shocked the jurors and was deemed a "vulgar subject matter". He was hurt by this rejection, and instead showed it at the second exhibition of the Impressionists, with whom he had already associated himself, in 1876. He presented it alongside some of his other works, including a second, different version of Raboteurs from 1876, and his earlier work Jeune homme à sa fenêtre (Young Man at His Window). The images of the floor scrapers came to be associated with Degas's paintings of washerwomen, also presented at the same exhibition and similarly scorned as "vulgar".

    Source

    Image source with high res download

    Gustave Caillebotte, The Floor Scrapers: Three shirtless workers kneel and scrape a wooden floor inside a Parisian apartment, their tools and muscular backs highlighted by light from the windows.
     

    Artist: Umberto Boccioni

    Year: 1902

    Medium: Gouache, charcoal, and pastel on paper

    Created by Umberto Boccioni in 1902 in Rome, Italy, the artwork titled “Young Man on a Riverbank” is an embodiment of the Impressionism and Realism art movements. As a genre painting, it offers a snapshot of everyday life, capturing a moment that conveys a broader cultural or social understanding.

    The artwork presents a contemplative scene featuring a solitary young man standing on a riverbank. He is portrayed in profile, gazing out over the water. His attire, notably a hat and a long coat, harmonizes with the formality of the early 20th century. The background is dominated by a warm, golden palette, suggesting the presence of either a sunrise or sunset sky filled with soft, billowing clouds. Below, the river reflects the luminous sky, with white streaks of light dancing on the water’s surface to create a serene and reflective atmosphere.

    The shore on the opposite side of the riverbank is lined with dense foliage, and a pier or dock structure extends into the water, where a small boat is moored. These elements give the scene a sense of place and tranquility, characteristic of the Impressionist movement’s pursuit to capture the fleeting effects of light and the Realist movement’s focus on the authentic depiction of ordinary life. The brushwork appears loose and expressive, contributing to the overall impressionistic quality of the painting. The composition invites the viewer to join the young man in his introspection, offering a moment of calm and reflection.

    Source

    Image Source

    Umberto Boccioni’s Young Man on a Riverbank, a painting of a solitary young man in profile wearing a hat and long coat as he gazes across the water. A warm golden sky with soft clouds reflects on the river, while dense foliage, a dock, and a small moored boat line the shore. 
    submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by to c/traditional_art@lemmy.world
     

    Artist: Edward Hopper

    Year: 1925

    Medium: Oil on canvas

    The Bootleggers is a 1925 painting by American realist Edward Hopper. The work generally marks the end of his early period before painting the House by the Railroad that same year, the start of his mature or classic period. The painting depicts a nautical scene in a subdued blue and gray palette, showing three men on board a motorboat staring at the shore where another man, standing besides a large house, stares back at them. It has been described and interpreted as Hopper's most overt, political, and even contrarian work.

    Art historians and critics believe that the painting is loosely based on the history of rum-running during Prohibition (1920–1933). The scene is thought to depict the smuggling of alcohol along the coast of Gloucester, Massachusetts, but Hopper's art dealer made it known that the painting was not based on an actual location but on several different scenes blended together. The Bootleggers was first exhibited in November at the Brooklyn Museum, followed by several other showings. Hopper held on to the painting for almost three decades until the Currier Museum of Art acquired it for their collection in 1956.

    Source

    Image Source with highres download

    Edward Hopper’s The Bootleggers depicts a stark coastal scene at dusk, with a white Victorian house standing isolated against a darkening sky. Three figures sit in a small boat in the foreground, suggesting secrecy or illicit activity. Cool colors and faint light from the house create a quiet, tense, somber mood.
     

    Artist: Juan Gris

    Year: 1917

    Medium: Oil on panel

    Like many European artists before them, Cubists often depicted Harlequin, a stock character in the Italian commedia dell’arte, a form of masked theater dating back to the sixteenth century. Easily recognized in his checkered costume, Harlequin is a trickster with a tendency to act on whim and passion. For this reason, several modern artists adopted the character as an alter ego. Gris was particularly fond of the subject; he portrayed Harlequin in approximately forty works made between 1917 and 1925. In this painting, caricature softens the Cubist fracturing of the figure, while bands of light illuminate Harlequin’s costume.

    Source

    Image Source

    Juan Gris’s cubist painting Harlequin with a Guitar, depicting a fragmented harlequin figure beside a guitar in muted brown, gray, and blue tones.
    view more: next ›