[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 3 points 24 minutes ago

You don't understand, everyone who disagrees with me (a true patriot liberal), is a russian/chinese bot or a paid shill super spy working to destroy my life and the country!!

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 3 points 14 hours ago

Do nothing's, do nothing? Shocking. More at 10.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago

They'll definitely kill Hasan first, it'll be their way of showing the left who's boss, and how "badass" they are. Chuds are perpetually trying to prove themselves to each other.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

Like I mentioned before, this is their new anti-China propaganda push. Just more brazen lies and bullshit

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Chuds will just handwave this away and say "all fires are set by people, nothing to do with climate change. Thinking the air quality is bad is just wokeness gone mad!"

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

First the chuds started their modern version of this with "cultural Marxism" and now it's basically "Cultural (Woke) Jeffery Epsteinism"

This is getting absurd, these freaks deserve the worst kind of pain imaginable for this horseshit

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

Why aren't chuds claiming this is woke because woman?

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

If it's any consolation they've been targeting Gen Z for years for being "lazy" and "know nothings"

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago

Hmm ok so we need to be all tall and shredded and chuds won't know what to do

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago

it collapsed industry.

Forgive me for being ignorant, but, uh, isn't that fucking bad for a country like Argentina? There must be skyrocketing poverty and unemployment.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago

What was the actual game plan? Like, it looks like he just sort of half-assed his libertarianism while making everything worse. And as far as I understand it, everyone loves it? Lmao

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 55 points 4 days ago

Which will then be presented as the radical left taking over society and smashing the free speech of brave patriotic nazis

53

From Al Jazeera:

US leads concern after China fired a long-range missile into Pacific ocean

China has test-fired a missile from a nuclear submarine that landed in “designated waters” in the Pacific Ocean, state news agency Xinhua reports, drawing criticism and concerns from the United States, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.

The Chinese navy test-launched the long-range ballistic missile at 12:01pm (04:01 GMT) on Monday from one of its nuclear-powered submarines in the South Pacific, Xinhua reported.

Xinhua said the test was a “routine arrangement” of China’s annual military training and was not directed at any specific target.

The US State Department urged China to “engage in meaningful arms control discussions and commit to a regularised notification arrangement for all intercontinental-range ballistic missile and space launches”.

Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong confirmed that China had notified the government of plans to conduct a sea-based missile test into the Pacific but said the action was “destabilising” to the region.

“Australia has been clear that this proposed test is in the context of a rapid military build-up by China, which is lacking in the transparency and reassurance as to intent that the region expects,” Wong told reporters at a news conference in the Fijian capital, Suva.

Japan’s government said it was notified of the missile launch and had urged China to reconsider.

“We expressed our grave concern over the Chinese military’s increased activity,” the government said, adding that Japan’s coastguard had been notified on Sunday by ⁠Chinese authorities about falling space debris that could fall within Japan’s exclusive economic zone.

The New Zealand government said it was informed of the planned launch within hours of it taking place.

“New Zealand considers this an unwelcome and concerning development. We, like our neighbours in other ‌Pacific countries, have no interest in China using the South Pacific as a testing site for missile capability,” Foreign Minister Winston Peters said in a statement.

67
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by SkingradGuard@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

From the BBC england-cool :

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky says he has returned Poland's highest honour after his Polish counterpart Karol Nawrocki said he was stripping him of the award. The Polish Order of the White Eagle was bestowed on Zelensky in 2023 by then-President Andrzej Duda. But Kyiv caused outrage last month after renaming a Ukrainian army unit after a group of controversial World War Two fighters called the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA). Three senior Ukrainian officials have also said they are returning awards bestowed by Poland, to show solidarity with their president. Many in Ukraine regard the UPA, which existed in the 1940s and 1950s, as heroes who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Soviet Red Army, Nazi Germany and Polish authorities. The group's red and black flag is often used by Ukrainian troops on the front line today.

Poland, however, accuses the UPA of carrying out a genocide of about 100,000 ethnic Poles in Volhynia (now Volyn in Ukraine) in 1943-45. In a statement on social media, Zelensky said Ukraine would "remain open to all meaningful formats of engagement with Poland in order to try to avoid conflicting interpretations of the difficult and painful chapters of our shared past". He added Ukraine was "grateful to the Polish People for their support and co-operation".

Poland has been one of Ukraine's main allies during the war against Russia, taking in hundreds of thousands of refugees and serving as a logistics hub for aid to Ukraine. Polish President Karol Nawrocki branded Ukraine's decision late last month to name the unit after the UPA "outrageous", "incomprehensible" and "deeply disappointing". "For the overwhelming majority of Polish society, the UPA remains, above all, a formation responsible for the brutal crimes committed against citizens of the Republic of Poland during World War Two," Nawrocki said in a video released on the president's official website. "It hurts not only our historical memory. It also undermines the trust built up over the years and in recent months," he added.

However, Nawrocki stressed the diplomatic row would not impact Poland's support for Ukraine against Russia. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on social media that any feud between the two "delights" Russia's Vladimir Putin and called on Zelensky and Nawrocki to "calm emotions, not to stoke tensions". Ukraine has ambitions to become an EU member state and attended the first phase of membership negotiations this week in Luxembourg.

BBC Archive linky

Poles: "wow, hold on, that effects us this time, go be the other kind of fascist we like!"

54

I swear to god there's now botting of comments where people comment "This is AI" on posts/art that are clearly not "AI" generated. I'm going to put on my conspiracy tinfoil hat on and say that this must be some sort of psyop, there's no way it's organic. It has to be some strategy that the big "AI" companies are doing to discredit anyone critical of "AI" products, to make anyone who dislikes them look crazy.

74

I honestly can't handle being around them, they love pretending to be more reasonable than they are, making me look like an emotional ass (thanks neurodivergence). Seriously, what's up with chuds dancing around the point and never being honest about their intentions? Like they pretend they don't want to exterminate muslims, or people from countries they don't like, why all the dishonesty? I know she believes these things because they like watching Ben Shapiro, Assmongold, Matt Walsh etc. She's joined Orthodox church after finding Catholics too woke for upholding hasic COVID restrictions, and constantly whines about Muslims.

I'm more than happy to admit I want society to be violent towards billionaires, fascists etc. Why can't they be honest about it, why dance around the point?

197
white female Mamdani (thelemmy.club)
submitted 2 months ago by SkingradGuard@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

Even we can't make this slop up LMAO

linky: https://archive.is/eWLB4

P.S. DON'T read the comments

13

Really makes you think :beanis:

If someone (or me) has already posted this, forgive my sins, for I am forgetful and full of beans (yim yum)

Also yeah I had beans for lunch AND dinner. I will probably have it for BREAKFAST too!

46
submitted 4 months ago by SkingradGuard@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Link: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5784951-wright-predicts-iran-war-end/

Archive: https://archive.is/2JiVB

THE HILL -

Energy Secretary Chris Wright said Sunday that he thinks the U.S. conflict in Iran could end in the next few weeks — or even sooner.

“I think that this conflict will certainly come to an end in the next few weeks,” Wright told ABC News’s Martha Raddatz on “This Week.” “Could be sooner than that, but the conflict will come to the end in the next few weeks.”

The war in Iran began late last month when the U.S. and Israel launched joint strikes against the Middle Eastern country, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and setting off a larger regional conflict.

President Trump said Friday the war will come to an end when he “feels it in [his] bones.” He has previously floated various possible timelines for when the military operation could wrap up.

A few days after the U.S. and Israel’s initial attack, Trump said he expected the offensive to take up to “four to five weeks” or longer.

Late last week, Gulf countries, including Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, called for an end to the war. Those three countries, alongside Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Oman, have all come under varying degrees of attack from Iran since the onset of the war.

Back in the U.S., high fuel prices have rattled Americans and markets, as some economists warn that an extended conflict could push the U.S. into a recession.

Wright, responding to Raddatz’s questions about rising gas prices, said Sunday he expects costs to decline when the conflict concludes.

“We’ll see a rebound in supplies and a pushing down of prices after that,” he said, noting that the administration was “very aware” that there would be a “short-term disruption” amid the conflict.

Wright said last week that he didn’t expect price spikes to last for months.

“Look, you never know exactly the time frame of this, but, in the worst case, this is a weeks, this is not a months thing,” he told CNN.

56
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by SkingradGuard@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

I hope y'all like some BBC propaganda slop! It's the same greatest hits they've been playing for years.

Linky: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgj9p15y87o

Archive linky: https://archive.is/1bXdt

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky continues to send out a firm message of defiance.

When we met this weekend in the government headquarters in Kyiv, he said that far from losing, Ukraine would end the war victorious. He was firmly against paying the price for a ceasefire deal demanded by President Vladimir Putin, which is withdrawing from strategic ground that Russia has failed to capture despite sacrificing tens of thousands of soldiers.

Putin, Zelensky told me, has already started World War Three, and the only answer was intense military and economic pressure to force him to step back.

"I believe that Putin has already started it. The question is how much territory he will be able to seize and how to stop him... Russia wants to impose on the world a different way of life and change the lives people have chosen for themselves."

What about Russia's demand for Ukraine to hand over the 20% of the eastern region of Donetsk that it still holds - a line of towns Ukraine calls "fortress cities" - as well as more land in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia? Isn't that, I asked, a reasonable request if it produces a ceasefire?

"I see this differently. I don't look at it simply as land. I see it as abandonment - weakening our positions, abandoning hundreds of thousands of our people who live there. That is how I see it. And I am sure that this 'withdrawal' would divide our society."

But isn't it a good price to pay if that satisfies Putin? Do you think it would satisfy him?

"It would probably satisfy him for a while... he needs a pause... but once he recovers, our European partners say it could take three to five years. In my opinion, he could recover in no more than a couple of years. Where would he go next? We do not know, but that he would want to continue [the war] is a fact."

I met Zelensky in a conference room inside the heavily guarded government enclave in a well-to-do corner of central Kyiv. In the interview he spoke mostly in Ukrainian.

You get a sense of the weight of leadership carried by Zelensky from the diligence of his security guards.

Visiting any head of state requires rigorous checks. But entering the presidential buildings in Kyiv takes the process to a level I have rarely experienced before.

It is not surprising in a country at war, with a president who has already been targeted by Russia.

Despite all that, the man who started as an entertainer, who won the Ukrainian version of Strictly Come Dancing in 2006, and played the role of an unexpected president of Ukraine in a TV comedy, before becoming the real-life president of Ukraine, seems to be remarkably resilient.

US President Donald Trump said on the eve of the most recent ceasefire talks in Geneva that "Ukraine better come to the table fast".

He continues to default to putting more pressure on Ukraine than on Russia.

Western diplomats have indicated since last summer that Trump agrees with Putin that territorial concessions from Ukraine to Russia are the key to the ceasefire Trump wants, ideally before this coming summer.

Plenty of analysts outside the White House also judge that Ukraine cannot win the war and, without making concessions to Moscow, will lose it.

I asked Zelensky whether Trump and the others had a point.

"Where are you now?" Zelensky asked in return. "Today you are in Kyiv, you are in the capital of our homeland, you are in Ukraine. I am very grateful for this. Will we lose? Of course not, because we are fighting for Ukraine's independence."

Zelensky has often said that Ukraine can win, but what would victory look like?

Of course, he said, victory meant restoring normal lives for Ukrainians and ending the killing. But the wider view of victory he presented was all about a global threat that he says comes from Putin.

"I believe that stopping Putin today and preventing him from occupying Ukraine is a victory for the whole world. Because Putin will not stop at Ukraine."

You are not saying that victory is getting all the land back, are you?

"We'll do it. That is absolutely clear. It is only a matter of time. To do it today would mean losing a huge number of people - millions of people - because the [Russian] army is large, and we understand the cost of such steps. You would not have enough people, you would be losing them. And what is land without people? Honestly, nothing."

"And we also don't have enough weapons. That depends not just on us, but on our partners. So as of now that's not possible but returning to the just borders of 1991 [the year Ukraine declared its independence, precipitating the final collapse of the Soviet Union] without a doubt, is not only a victory, it's justice. Ukraine's victory is the preservation of our independence, and a victory of justice for the whole world is the return of all our lands."

A year ago, Zelensky visited the White House and received a reception one senior Western diplomat described to me as a pre-planned public "diplomatic mugging" from Donald Trump and his Vice-President JD Vance.

Their argument, in the presence of the world's media, was watched by millions around the world.

Trump, just inaugurated as president for the second time, was sending the strongest possible signal that the era of support Zelensky and Ukraine had relied on from President Joe Biden was over. Nato members were already on notice from the new administration. Vance had just got back from shattering Western European illusions about the strength of the trans-Atlantic alliance.

Since then, reportedly coached by Britain's National Security Adviser Jonathan Powell among others, Zelensky has avoided public confrontations with Trump.

The US president has stopped almost all shipments of military aid to Ukraine. But the US still provides vital intelligence, and European countries are spending billions buying weapons from the Americans to give to Ukraine

I asked Ukraine's president about Trump's often contradictory statements, recalling that among the untruths he has uttered is the accusation that Zelensky is a dictator who started the war - a precise echo of claims made by Vladimir Putin.

Zelensky laughed.

"I am not a dictator, and I didn't start the war, that's it."

But can you trust Trump? If you extract a security guarantee from him, I asked, would he keep his word? He is after all a man who changes his mind.

"It is not only President Trump, we're talking about America. We are all presidents for the appropriate terms. We want guarantees for 30 years for example. Political elites will change, leaders will change."

He meant that US security guarantees needed approval from Congress in Washington DC to make them watertight.

"They will be voted on in Congress for a reason. It's not just presidents. Congress is needed. Because the presidents change, but institutions stay."

In other words, Donald Trump might be unreliable, but he will not be there for ever.

Zelensky says those security guarantees would have to be in place before he could consider another US demand - for Ukraine to hold a general election by the summer, echoing another Russian talking point that Zelensky is an illegitimate president. Trump has not demanded elections in Russia, where Putin became leader for the first time on the last day of the 20th Century.

Zelensky said he had not decided whether to stand again, whenever an election is held: "I might run and might not."

Elections were due in 2024, but they could not be held under martial law that was introduced after Russia's full-scale invasion.

Holding postponed elections, Zelensky said, was technically possible if they had time to change the law to allow them to happen. But he needed security guarantees for Ukraine first.

He went on to raise so many potential problems about holding an election with millions of Ukrainians abroad as refugees and significant tracts of the country occupied by Russia that I suggested that in reality he was against the idea.

"If this is a condition for ending the war, let's do it. I said, 'honestly, you constantly raise the issue of elections'. I told the partners, 'you need to decide one thing: you want to get rid of me or you want to hold elections? If you want to hold elections, (even if you are not ready to tell me honestly even now), then hold these elections honestly. Hold them in a way that the Ukrainian people will recognise, first of all. And you yourself must recognise that these are legitimate elections'."

9

Hehe

:beanis:

53
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by SkingradGuard@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Link: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5748269-vance-supreme-court-tariff-ruling/

Linky archive: https://archive.is/72517

by Sarah Davis

Vice President Vance condemned the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a majority of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs on Friday.

“Today, the Supreme Court decided that Congress, despite giving the president the ability to ‘regulate imports’, didn’t actually mean it,” Vance posted on the social platform X. “This is lawlessness from the Court, plain and simple. And its only effect will be to make it harder for the president to protect American industries and supply chain resiliency.

The vice president pointed to a “wide range of other tariff powers” still available to the president.

Vance’s statement echoed Trump’s remarks at the White House on Friday afternoon, when he said he was “ashamed of certain members of the court.”

A majority ruled against the Trump administration’s decision to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose steep tariffs on countries across the globe. The emergency measure grants the U.S. president the ability to place regulations on imports in response to “unusual and extraordinary” threats.

Two of the six justices in the majority opinion — Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch — were appointed by Trump.

The president criticized them in his Friday remarks to the press.

“I don’t want to say whether I regret nominating them. I think their decision was terrible,” Trump said. “I think it’s an embarrassment to their families.”

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have expressed discontent with the Trump administration’s use of IEEPA to impose tariffs, pointing to Congress’ constitutional authority over federal taxation. A resolution calling for the cessation of Trump’s tariffs passed in the Senate last fall with bipartisan support.

Recent polling indicated that most Americans felt similarly, with 67 percent of respondents expressing their support for the Supreme Court to overturn these policies in a February survey.

A recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York indicated that U.S. businesses and consumers took on about 90 percent of the costs of these tariffs, despite claims from the White House that foreign countries would shoulder the majority of the financial burden.

Several Republican lawmakers have come out in support of the court’s decision Friday. Kentucky’s GOP Sens. Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell — who both voted in favor of passing the Senate resolution last October — commended the ruling.

Paul, who sponsored the resolution, called the ruling a “defense of our Republic” in a post on X.

McConnell said in a statement that the court’s decision leaves “no room for doubt” on the issue of Congress’s constitutional authority over tariffs.

“Congress’ role in trade policy, as I have warned repeatedly, is not an inconvenience to avoid,” McConnell said. “If the executive would like to enact trade policies that impact American producers and consumers, its path forward is crystal clear: convince their representatives under Article 1.”

Lol, lmao

71
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by SkingradGuard@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Linky: https://archive.is/SlCn6

Other linky: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/13/lindsey-graham-to-allies-get-over-greenland-00780269

Lindsey Graham to allies: Get over Greenland

The South Carolina Republican offered a fairly optimistic take on a NATO alliance that's been battered by the dispute over Greenland.

By Joe Gould

Sen. Lindsey Graham says it’s time for America’s allies to move on from their angst over President Donald Trump’s recent gambit to acquire Greenland — and start doing more work to strengthen the NATO alliance.

“Greenland is behind us,” said the South Carolina Republican Friday at the Munich Security Conference. “I think everybody’s hugging it out and we’ll live to fight another day.”

More broadly, Graham’s message was that Trump’s pressure campaign on Europe has ultimately reinforced NATO — and that allies now need to translate higher defense spending into sharper support for Ukraine. It was an optimistic take after the alliance neared a rupture over Trump’s threats.

“Everybody loves NATO,” Graham said. “Well, I love it because people are doing more.”

Graham, a Trump ally, predicted that talks between the U.S., Greenland and Denmark over the future of the Danish territory will yield an agreement for more U.S. military infrastructure there. Trump recently reversed course after leaving open the option to seize Greenland.

“Who gives a shit who owns Greenland,” Graham said. “The point is Greenland is going to be more fortified because Donald Trump, once he feels like it’s his brand or his buy-in, is going to go big.”

On Ukraine, he said the U.S. needs to put more pressure on Moscow to help peace talks.

Graham said he plans to advocate for Ukraine to receive Tomahawk missiles, more training for Ukrainian forces and longer-range systems capable of striking deeper into Russian territory. He is backing a bipartisan Russia sanctions package that has stalled in Congress, but he insisted Trump would sign it.

“He’s asked me, like, three times, where’s the bill? He went from like, ‘I don’t know about this’ to ‘Yeah, that’s good idea,’” Graham said.

He credited Trump with forcing European governments to boost defense budgets and argued the alliance would not be contributing as much without his prodding. He cast Trump’s mix of tariff threats and unpredictability as an effective approach with allies and adversaries.

“When it’s all said and done, in 2028 or 2032 or 2040 — whenever he leaves — we will have a stronger NATO and a weaker Russia,” he said.

192
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by SkingradGuard@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
view more: next ›

SkingradGuard

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago