605
Anon is 23 (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 158 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Why is learning a trade only considered a last resort?

Because a lot of trades are pretty bad for your health. They require getting in potentially unsafe environments, dealing with substances or byproducts that can lead to cancers or other occupational diseases. They also require a lot more physical work. So of course people would prefer a cushy office job to trawling through crawlspaces lined with asbestos to plug in a light. Not to mention that a lot of trade jobs are not that great paid when starting out, the good pay comes with years of experience and until you get there you have to suffer through all the above. Sure some office jobs don't pay well starting out either but you just sit on your ass in a air conditioned office instead of nailing 2x4s in the hot sun for 8 hours.

People always ask this question but they never consider that there are actual valid considerations that make trade jobs unattractive compared to other jobs.

Edit: Oh also a lot of well paid trade people run their own companies which is an additional stress and a lot of people don't want to deal with that. My father is in trades and he ran his own company and I watched him age 20 years in the span of 5 due to all the stress and physical work he was doing. Running a company, even a small one is no easy job.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 28 points 23 hours ago

The pay part of that equation is dependent on where you are, and what trade you're talking about.

Where I am, trades generally get paid more than any office job you're going to get with just a random bachelors degree. And if you join one of the trade unions, especially one of the higher skilled industrial ones (so like electricians, pipefitters, millwrights, etc, as opposed to general labour or residential construction), your pay will be much higher than entry level office positions, and will likely stay higher than anyone who doesn't get themselves into an upper management type position.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

electricians, pipefitters, millwrights

Electricians, pipefitters, and millwrights have really hazardous jobs. That’s why they get paid so well, directly and indirectly (because it takes a lot of training to do those jobs safely).

I’m not trying to discourage anyone from taking these jobs, but they’re not risk free.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Define "really hazardous".

What are the rates of workplace injury for trades compared to the rates of people getting long term health effects caused by sedentary work conditions?

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

Per 100k full time employees, 1.6, 3.1, and 1.8/year versus 0.8/year for electricians, pipefitters, and millwrights, respectively, vs office workers.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

So based on those statistics, I will say that those trades are definitely not "really dangerous". Tortilla manufacturering is twice as dangerous at 6.2, and hospital workers were up above 10. Going from 0.8 to 1.6 is like going from laying on your couch to walking down the sidewalk.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

When I started in construction 20 years ago minimum wage was $10, but most trades start at $15, this is for a laborer, apprentices got $18

After 4 years I was 33.50 an hour and still had room to move up. My direct supervisor was making $50, but he had a cash bonus to pay for his truck, instead of them giving him one.

Now minimum wage is $15 and most trades start at $21 and hour.

legally the company is supposed to pay apprentices 60% of the lowest paid journeyman, but they can hire people specifically to lower this -.- fourth years get 90%, it goes up each year. It forces a raise after finishing each schooling section.

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 21 hours ago

Trade jobs frequently require buying a lot of the equipment and protective gear. Most of the high pay examples include a lot of overtime, and may be limited when work isn't available. A lot of trades don't have a regular 40 hour work week, if the weather is bad for a week they may not make any money.

It really depends and is a lot more complex of a comparison. Trades are important and I think they should have more stability and require less personal cost, although most of that would be addressed if we had single payer healthcare and UBI.

[-] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 21 hours ago

Sitting on your arse all day, everyday is equally bad for your health. I'd probably argue even worse, you can't get PPE to help protect you from sedentary working conditions.

[-] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

Yeah you can. Adequate breaks for eyes, standing desks, under desk elliptical/treadmill, etc... not that most employers will supply or allow it, but it can be overcome.

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub -2 points 18 hours ago

It's not even close. When I went from 50:50 lab/office to 10:90 lab/office I gained like 12 kg and outgrew all of my pants in a year. Granted a bit of that was stress with my asshole bosses but I believe that just working on my feet a couple of hours versus being sedentary made a massive difference.

[-] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Reread my post. You can do things at a desk, in an office, or at home...

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 4 hours ago

Nah, I got the meaning of your post. Standing at the desk, even with a treadmill, is not the same as natural movement. Taking breaks from a physically passive activity is not tge same as being constantly physically active.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 18 points 21 hours ago

you can't get PPE to help protect you from sedentary working conditions

Wrist braces, chairs that encourage you to sit upright, risers for your monitor, a standing desk, etc...

You can also choose to be active in your time off, or during breaks or while waiting for something to load. If you work a physically demanding trade, no amount of elective sedentary behavior in your free time will compensate for the damage and strain you're putting your body through at work.

Also, this is all without mentioning the fact that some people have disabilities that prevent them from doing many trades.

[-] architect 12 points 21 hours ago

It’s definitely no where close to worse.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago

Depends on which trade and location you're comparing with. Things vary wildly in the trades.

[-] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 20 hours ago

Name one that is better for your health than (checks notes) ... sitting down.

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Locksmithing and similar type trades. Not construction trades. You're on your feet, but you aren't necessarily breaking your body lifting and such.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 8 points 21 hours ago

Yep..... Certain trades are worse for your bones and joints, but not much is going to be worse for your systemic health than sitting for half the day.

As someone who's worked in construction and now works in orthopedics and rehabilitation, I think the biggest issue with a lot of people in trades like residential construction is that they don't really learn how to prioritize their physical health until a lot of the damage is already done. Once you're a bit older you kinda learn that even if carrying that 80lb bag of cement by yourself is faster, it's still better to take the time to grab a dolly or another person. Most of the issues would be solved if we had better regulations.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

The effects of sitting on your arse can be mitigated with 30 to 40 minutes of daily vigorous exercise. There are a bunch of studies showing this. It's not remotely the same thing.

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Standing desks to transition from aitting to standing and exercising on breaks is the PPE for office work.

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It'd be lovely if the US had more requirements for providing better tools for office workers. I've never had a job be willing to fund anything outside of pointing me at a used desk with a 15 year old computer.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I'm not saying that everyone who doesn't get an office job should immediately become a tradie. When you have nothing else to offer, just having some industry certificates is an advantage. Even if the certificate is unrelated to the job. My first job was assembly machine operator in a factory. My boss straight up told me that he hired me because of my Cisco and ECDL certs that I got in high school (for free because Europe).

If you don't get the office job you wanted, you've still opened up some options. Tradie life isn't glamorous, but it pays better than complaining on an internet forum.

And if you do get a job and it doesn't work out, you'll still have something to fall back on.

[-] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 points 23 hours ago

Of all the working class, they are often worked the hardest.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
605 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

8531 readers
1167 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS