A meme counter-arguing the claim "Without a profit motive, no one would be productive!" by showing examples of unpaid productivity: Wikipedia, complex Minecraft builds, open-source code, and volunteer firefighters.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 183 points 6 months ago (115 children)

This is how you tell rich people have some serious mental health issue.

Decent people would rather a world where people worked because they enjoy that type of work rather than being forced to do it because they need money to live.

If you removed money, imagine where we'd all be as a society without the toxicity of money, wars and hate! :(

  • source
  • hideshow 115 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 6 months ago (27 children)

    If you removed money, imagine where we’d all be as a society

    Probably dead or living in the stone age.

    There's so many jobs that people don't enjoy but are necessary. Nobody enjoys working in the middle of an australian desert at 40°C in a lithium mine. Nobody enjoys collecting your stinking trash. Nobody enjoys sitting in a store for 8 hours a day, scanning groceries. Nobody enjoys working in a warehouse for 8 hours.

    However, these jobs and many more are vital for todays society.

    toxicity of money, wars and hate!

    You make it sound like wealth and wars are an invention of capitalism and not something that has existed basically since the dawn of time, even as something you can observe in primates, albeit on a much smaller scale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 6 months ago* (12 children)

    The reasons those jobs are such shit is also money. A lot of people enjoy cleaning, nobody enjoys being overworked. Normal functioning societies don't leave heaps of stinking trash around, they neatly pack it and the work of a janitor of garbage collector becomes actually enjoyable if you're a proper type of personality.
    Hell, my uncle right now works as a part time street sweeper basically for free. He has his basic needs met by other means, and his "job" pays him enough to get a cup of coffee before the shift and a sandwich after. He just enjoys making the world cleaner, chatting with locals, taking care of stray cats, and having a routine. All of that is possible in a world that doesn't revolves around squeesing every bit of labour from people so some pedos can buy themselves another island and fill it with sex slaves

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (5 children)

    And you think your uncle is a scalable solution to a city of millions of people. These positions dont scale. Some quick googling show about a half a millions workers in waste remediation in the us in 2023. Do you honestly think you could find half a million people like your uncle that all live spread out enough to fill all the positions (thats on the low end of need also fyi, not surprisingly they have high turnover and difficulty keeping staff for extended periods) around the entire us and that those people would never lose motivation or get burned out or just tired or stop caring. Because that is what we need and that is a single job for a single industry.

    Its not scalable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I just think it's boring that you think money is the only reasonable motivator for these people. There are other forms of compensation and appreciation. And it's not the only option available to us. It's crazy to me that people understand the idea of countries that have military conscription but can't fathom the idea of a system of workable civil conscription.

    As I see it you successfully identified a problem and a solution, but that does not suggest that that is the sole or even best solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    When you do your scaling you need to scale everything. The adult population of the US is estimated as 266 million people as of now. Half a million is roughly 1 adult in 530 people. Let's quadruple it up so they have nice relaxed works schedule. Let's say now you need 4 people per 530. If you think you can't find 10 out of 1000 people who would do some sanitation work, with no stress and without having to think where their next meal comes from, you just never met people.
    And this is the most important part that you seem to ignore - when people's basic means are met, they want to fulfill higher levels of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. For some that means doing arts or doing some engineering or running a company. For some, and there are s many of those some, that means "it's not much but it's honest work". Doing small visible changes that make the world the better place one picked up piece of rubbish at a time, is exactly, precisely what significant portion of humanity will be doing.
    This also works in another direction: billions of people who would be doing something grand and moving humanity further, are stuck in mundane repetitive broken jobs they hate, because they're stuck in this cycle of needing to grind to survive, without having a moment to breath, which slowly kills every bit of light they once had a potential to have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Like, half of the jobs you listed would be automated out pretty quick in a world without money, out of the other ones, a few would be rendered obsolete without profit motive (pretty sure we can find something better for batteries than lithium, and why would you need someone scanning groceries if there was no money?). What's left can be rotated out or done by lottery, and those doing the undesirable labor get to have more luxury items or whatever. It's not hard to imagine, people have been doing it for centuries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Automated by who?

    We do need incentives to work. As technology and efficiency advances we should be able to work less, but we still need people to do work they/we don't want to do.

    Personally I think people are pretty happy working 24 hours a week even if their job isn't something they love doing. I'm more interested in working towards that, slowly, over time, than just going to "nobody needs to work".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Like, half of the jobs you listed would be automated out pretty quick in a world without money

    If that was even remotely possible, companies would've done that already. Every company tries to cut staff as much as possible.

    pretty sure we can find something better for batteries than lithium

    Which requires research, which requires investment. Much of the research we currently have only exists exactly because of funding, and a lot of funding is done by companies, not by the government.

    What’s left can be rotated out or done by lottery, and those doing the undesirable labor get to have more luxury items or whatever

    I like the "whatever". Let's just introduce a shitty system that also potentially forces people to do work they don't want to do and they get like a bar of soap or "whatever" as reward..

    It’s not hard to imagine, people have been doing it for centuries.

    I don't know where these people lived that you talk about, but it certainly wasn't on this planet. Such a system has never existed.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Nobody enjoys working in the middle of an australian desert at 40°C in a lithium mine.

    Believe it or not I’ve actually met someone who enjoys this line of work. He lives in the middle of nowhere in Paraburdoo Australia and loves the heat. So not exactly nobody..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Capitalism is different from a regular market in that it is not just trying to make a profit in order to have enough money to exchange for useful goods and services.

    Capitalism demands that your profit grows and grows and grows. It's growth for it's own sake. A capitalistic economy like our world economy needs to grow 3% or so every year or it gets into a recession. 3% doesn't sound like much, but it's exponential growth, doubling every 25 years or so. This growth doesn't come out of thin air, but from extracting from value from other people, our world and so on.

    And measuring an economy by GDP is incomplete, because it doesn't take uncompensated labor, human happiness and wellbeing, and public goods (like a healthy nature) into account. When a factory owner pollutes and dries up the river while employees have no choice but to work 16 hour weeks, GDP goes up.

    In nature, things grow until they are mature. That does not mean progress halts. Adults don't grow anymore, but continue to learn.

    My try to explain why money and markets are okay, but growth for it's own sake (growthism you may call it) is destroying our societies, making us unhappy, and is also killing us with the climate and biodiversity crises.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (82 children)

    Society would collapse.
    While working out of enjoyment instead of necessity is a noble and good goal. There are jobs that no one enjoys. Money can be used as an incentive to motivate people to work on jobs that aren't that enjoyable, but still necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 82 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (32 children)

    Which jobs? Most of the time there are people enjoying something you wouldn't expect

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (21 children)

    Some yeah, but undoubtedly not enough to keep it working. For example i doubt that many people enjoy working at garbage disposable or basically any waste disposal. Of course these jobs should be fully operated by machines. Or any assistant jobs in manufacturing or jobs that operate in shifts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    For example i doubt that many people enjoy working at garbage disposable or basically any waste disposal

    Ehhh I bet you'd be wrong. Only anecdotal obviously, but at practice and games for the kids, a lot of dads just chat when there isnt much going on. A couple of them work for the local garbage company. One of them commented that he doesnt know how I stay inside and work all day, he really enjoys being outside with the trucks in the morning, then enjoying the afternoon outside with the kids. Another one is a mechanic for them, he always thought the trucks were cool, and he still enjoys working on them (though he will 100% tell you, in great detail, which manufacturers suck for various parts). Haven't talked much with the last one about work, I think he is the only one just straight up doing it for money though.

    And who knows, maybe the guy who likes being outside says that to be positive about his choices in life, but I see him at the park with the kids a lot, I've run into him heading out to the trails on his mountain bike, etc, so I believe him that he's perfectly happy doing it.

    Automation for unwanted tasks is great though, I agree, and where automation should be focused.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I was also thinking that. As an example, retail work seems to me to be a kind of hell I don't think I'd want to endure. But I know people that really enjoy it. So it's probably true of any job you might think is only done by those that are forced to.

    I think, if AI and robotics replace most jobs. After some years of pain when capitalists enjoy the infinite money glitch they've discovered, there will either be a revolution or a natural coming to understand that things need to work differently.

    Now, understand this would only work if the vast majority of work could be done via automation. In this case the vast majority of people would be able to pursue what they enjoy, a bit like the star trek anti-economy. If all remaining required jobs were no longer filled by those that volunteered to do them, there would be some kind of draft (think like jury duty), where people able to do a job have a chance to be called in to do it for a few months then released back to pursue their own interests.

    I've always seen capitalism as the carrot on a stick we need, when we need human productivity from the vast majority of people. If that's no longer the case, it's not a suitable solution and all the ideas like universal basic income are just stopgap measures to try to eke a bit more time out of the capitalist system that has already run past the point where we can keep enough people usefully employed to make it work. That's almost certainly the reason we're seeing the huge wealth disparity that increases. As the productivity per person goes up, all the increased value only ever rises to the top.

    Bit of a mini rant there, sorry about that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] [S] 16 points 6 months ago* (44 children)

    Living in a nice society is all the motivation people need. I hate doing dishes, but I do them because I hate living without clean dishes even more. Everyone understands sometimes we gotta do stuff we don't like doing for a greater good. Acting like we need a wageslave class to do menial tasks otherwise we'd just let our world collapse is insulting our collective intelligence. We can share the burden.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 44 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (22 children)

    Living in a nice society is all the motivation people need.

    You might want to read up on the bystander effect. You do the dishes because no-one else is going to do it. But as soon as there are others who can do the job people will just stand around and let other die before they put in the effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    That's absolutely not what bystander effect is, not even close. It has also nothing to do with the issue at hand. Bystander effect caused not by not willing to put an effort, it's incredibly complicated, layered, and not exactly explained, but probably the only thing we know about it for sure is that it's not because people are lazy

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I don't think you understand. I want my boat to be bigger than your boat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments